Monumental Questions - Cache Creek Bridge Brings Opportunity for Recreational Renewal

Andrew Fulks • December 5, 2022

The old bridge over Cache Creek, which only allowed foot traffic, has been replaced!

With news that the Road 40 (aka. Rayhouse Road) bridge over Cache Creek is complete, it is important that people realize both the opportunities as well as the challenges that come with it being almost 14 years since the original bridge was condemned. One of the issues with areas that have reduced public and maintenance access over such a long time is that many if not all of the people in charge of management of the area have moved on or in some cases, have passed away. Their successors won’t necessarily know the backstory of an area and what needs to take place after the access issue has been resolved. They, and even much of the general public, won’t know the historical context of the area and may only be familiar with the current conditions, not how the area was before the bridge was condemned.


Though not yet a National Monument, in 2008 the Fiske Creek canyon area of the Blue Ridge in Yolo County was a hub of recreation opportunity for residents of the region. Yolo County has the Lower Cache Canyon Regional Park day use area next to the creek where the rebuilt bridge crosses. Before 2008, BLM actively managed the canyon lands as well as a number of trails, including the Blue Ridge Trail north and southFiske Creek Trail, and Frog Pond Trail. There was a primitive camp at the south end of the Fiske Creek Trail along Fiske Creek Road, complete with concrete fire pit and picnic table. The Blue Ridge South Trailhead was reachable by 2-wheel drive car back then. Buck Island campground, a remote wilderness camp along Cache Creek at the end of Langs Peak Road was a draw for family camping. BLM invested hundreds of thousands of dollars into the Buck Island campground and it features two precast concrete restrooms. Buck Island was also the put-in for two rafting concessions, allowing them to run two-day wilderness trips that explored different parts of the river between days.


Then, in 2008, Caltrans condemns the low-water bridge over Cache Creek as the footings are undermined. This is also the year of the financial crisis, so Yolo County, no longer able to cross the bridge with a road grader, opts to cease maintenance of Rayhouse Road. BLM, also unable to cross the bridge and with Rayhouse Road now unmaintained, can no longer get a road grader to the upper areas to maintain Fiske Creek Road and Langs Peak Road to Buck Island. BLM can’t get inmate crews up to the Fiske Creek Trail or Blue Ridge Trail South trailhead, as busses can no longer travel over the bridge or the unmaintained Rayhouse Road. Volunteer crews can’t feasibly access the Fiske Creek and Blue Ridge South trailheads to maintain the trails, as they are many miles away and the day would be done by the time one was able to walk the old road to the trailhead.


This inability to cross the bridge, which led to lack of maintenance on the dirt Rayhouse Road, begins the downward spiral of recreation opportunities and management. Rayhouse Road suffers from massive erosion as winter rains and runoff plug the culverts, causing flow across the road and vertical eroded edges where it travels down the bank. The same thing happens on BLM’s Fiske Creek Road and Langs Peak Road, rendering them impassible. Lacking the maintenance from inmate and volunteer crews due to vehicle inaccessibility, Blue Ridge Trail south of Fiske Peak becomes overgrown and almost impassable. Fiske Creek Trail suffers the same, with overgrown brush making it very difficult find and to follow. Buck Island, now only accessible by motorcycle or quad and no longer having active ranger patrols, begins to see vandalism. The rafting concessions lose a quarter of their business, as they can no longer offer the 'wilderness' overnight trip. Marijuana growers move into Fiske Creek Canyon and near New Cacheville, as the Sheriff no longer patrols the area. Several fires, including the 2009 Oasis fire and 2015 Rocky and Jerusalem fires are difficult to access due to the lack of a bridge. A portable pontoon bridge is installed to allow firefighting efforts during the 2015 fires as well as the 2018 County fire. CalFire grades Rayhouse Road, but only for fire suppression efforts during those events, so it washes out immediately after the rains begin as the grading is not performed with longevity in mind.


Yolo County and Tuleyome began pushing for bridge replacement almost immediately after it was condemned in 2008, but it was the subsequent fires that made the bridge a priority. Thanks to our State Representatives, funding was secured for the design and replacement of the bridge. In 2020, construction is began on a replacement and the bridge has just been opened! 


The bridge replacement gives us the opportunity to restore management and recreation opportunities in the Fiske Creek Canyon area of the Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument.


There are opportunities such as:


*Yolo County can now access Rayhouse road and resume maintenance


*BLM can restore maintenance of Fiske Creek Road and Langs Peak Road, now that Rayhouse Road will be again accessible


*Once Fiske Creek Road is restored, Fiske Creek Trail and Blue Ridge Trail south can be brushed, re-opening the trails for the public.


*Frog Pond Trail can be rebuilt after damage from CalFire during the County Fire last summer.


*Fiske Creek Campground can be re-opened.


*Buck Island will again be usable for the general public via access from Highway 16.


However, with an almost entirely new BLM and County staff, there isn’t an internal push to repair and re-open all of the trailheads, campgrounds, and access roads that can be restored after the bridge is replaced. It is up to us to advocate for repair and restoration of this amazing recreational resource, and let our leaders and land managers know we want to regain what we had 14 years ago.


This area is a substantial part of the National Monument, the only part of the monument accessible within Yolo County, and is a beloved public resource. I am hoping the replacement of the bridge spurs both conversation and action between BLM, Yolo County, and non-profit groups like Tuleyome, to prepare for future public use of the area. A plan is needed to deal with the increased public access that will result from the bridge begin restored. Working together, we can make the area like it was prior to 2008, or even better! With restored public recreational access, and with access for ranger and sheriff patrols, the public and natural resources will benefit from completion of the new Road 40 bridge over Cache Creek!


-Andrew Fulks


Tuleyome Advisory Council Member

RECENT ARTICLES

June 5, 2025
We extend our thanks and gratitude to Stephen McCord as he ends his tenure on the Tuleyome Board of Directors. Stephen has applied his energy and expertise to fulfilling Tuleyome’s mission for many years. In 2016 he managed the first Tuleyome mercury mine remediation project at the Corona/Twin Peaks Mine. He followed that with work on Tuleyome trail projects in the Knoxville Off-Highway Vehicle Area, riding all the trails on his own adventure motorcycle. As a Tuleyome representative, he’s taken many community members on hikes in Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument and the surrounding areas. Stephen has over 20 years of environmental engineering experience, in California and worldwide. He has overseen extensive projects in water quality field work, management and cleanup, and has applied his knowledge to policy development, analysis and technical support. In short, Stephen is a consummate environmental and water engineer, and he brought his expertise to Tuleyome’s many projects. In 2023 Stephen joined the Board of Directors and agreed to serve as President. He applied his supreme organizational skills to managing board duties and activities. He also brought an optimism to the board about what can be accomplished with foresight, good planning and collaboration. Stephen has been a tireless advocate for Tuleyome, keeping the board on task even while handling numerous other professional responsibilities. Fortunately, although he is stepping down from the board, he will continue to support Tuleyome’s mission in many other ways. -Kim Longworth, Lyndsay Dawkins and Bill Grabert Volunteer Tuleyome Board members 
By Geoff Benn June 5, 2025
A river otter making its way up the slide. Looking to take a break with some cute video content? This month we placed game cameras looking into an otter slide at Conaway Ranch. Otter slides are paths worn into riverbanks by repeated use by otters and other animals. The slides at Conaway are quite active, so we’ve been able to get some great footage, including otters, beavers, racoons, snakes, and more! 
By Bryan Pride June 5, 2025
Since April 2024, America's public lands had something they'd never had before: a rule that treated conservation as equal to all other land uses. The Public Lands Rule , introduced by the Biden Administration, formally recognized conservation as a legitimate practice of multiple use, putting conservation on equal footing with recreation, grazing, and resource extraction. Built on decades of management experience and guided by science, data, and Indigenous knowledge, it gives land managers tools to maintain healthy ecosystems while supporting all the diverse ways we depend on public lands. It acknowledges a simple truth: conservation must be valued equally to all other land uses. Now there is growing pressure to rescind it. Why This Matters The environment around us is free-flowing, it's not confined to state borders or county lines. When mining operations contaminate watersheds in Northern California, it impacts the local businesses who depend on healthy rivers downstream, the agricultural communities that rely on clean water, and the families who've been camping along those waterways for generations. The Public Lands Rule recognized this interconnected reality and gave land managers agency to address problems before they spread across California's diverse landscapes, protecting the long-term viability of grazing allotments, recreation areas, and rural livelihoods that all depend on healthy public lands. This interconnected reality is exactly why the Public Lands Rule matters. The Rule is designed to ensure that the places we depend on, whether for weekend camping trips, or cattle grazing, stay healthy enough to support these uses long-term. When an area becomes overgrazed and doesn't recover, access to those grazing allotments is permanently lost, reducing ranchers' ability to maintain their livelihoods and harming local food production. Poor use or overuse of our public lands creates ripples of negative impact that hurt all communities. The Rule's main objective is simple but revolutionary: make sure our public lands stay productive for everyone who depends on them, rather than degrade them. The Rule created practical tools that built in accountability and prioritized future generations' access to healthy public lands. Restoration Leases : 10-year agreements allowing a variety of entities such as, conservation groups, tribes, and nonprofits to restore damaged landscapes—fires restoration, restoring wildlife habitats and cleaning up abandoned mining sites that currently scar some of our most beautiful public lands. Mitigation Leases : A tool that allows land users or other entities to offset impacts from their activities over specified time periods, creating partnerships between different land users and conservation groups to address environmental impacts on public lands. Strengthened Protection for Critical Areas : Clearer guidelines for protecting Areas of Critical Environmental Concern—the most special and fragile places that often provide the best wildlife viewing, the cleanest water sources, the most pristine camping experiences and the richest biodiversity. The False Dichotomy: Multiple Use vs. Conservation The main argument being used to encourage the rollback of the Public Lands Rule is " multiple use ", the legal principle requiring Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands to serve many different purposes. The current Administration claims the Public Lands Rule hinders multiple uses of public lands. Why? The Rule calls for restoring degraded areas and making science based decisions. Contrary to their actual meaning, the current Administration interprets "restoring" and "science based decisions" as "locking up land". Land locking, where access gets completely cut off, is a real concern in some areas—it prevents both recreation and grazing. However, land locking is not what the Public Lands Rule promotes. In reality, it is promoting land healing. Take grazing for example. The Rule empowers BLM to use restoration leases in conjunction with existing grazing permittees to restore degraded rangeland. Monitoring who is grazing where and the number of permits issued for specific areas is a means to ensure sustainable grazing and prevent overuse. Many ranchers and land managers supported the Rule because they understand that healthy land is productive land. Overgrazing and environmental damage hurt their livelihoods too. The same principle applies to fire recovery. When public lands are damaged by sweeping wildfires, there is a need for active restoration: replanting native vegetation, stabilizing soils, removing hazardous debris. Restoration has to take place before safe recreation, grazing and other uses can resume. At times, restoration requires temporarily limiting access to burned areas as they recover. The goal is to allow for our lands to recover and heal before we start depending on them again with our multiple uses. Land restoration is not just limited to grazing or extraction; it is essential for recovering from wildfires. Whether it's grazing, recreation, or extraction, the Public Lands Rule isn't about stopping these uses, it's about understanding that healthy ecosystems are prerequisites for multiple use, not obstacles to it. You can't have sustainable grazing on degraded rangeland, quality recreation in fire damaged landscapes, or responsible extraction without considering long-term impacts We Are Public Stewards The Public Lands Rule represents a historic shift in how we value conservation, its potential rollback is a setback. But the vision it represents, conservation as a form of legitimate multiple use, remains essential and is not gone. As stewards of these 245 million acres, we have the power to practice conservation in our own actions and advocacy. Every time we practice Leave No Trace, support local businesses that operate responsibly on public lands, and make our voices heard in land management decisions, we're building the foundation for balanced stewardship that benefits everyone. Our public lands belong to all of us, which means we each have the power, and responsibility, to be good stewards of the lands we love. -Bryan Pride ( bpride@tuleyome.org ) Certified California Naturalist Policy Director