Policy Corner: The Public Lands Rule: The Significance of Conservation

Bryan Pride • June 5, 2025

Since April 2024, America's public lands had something they'd never had before: a rule that treated conservation as equal to all other land uses. The Public Lands Rule, introduced by the Biden Administration, formally recognized conservation as a legitimate practice of multiple use, putting conservation on equal footing with recreation, grazing, and resource extraction. Built on decades of management experience and guided by science, data, and Indigenous knowledge, it gives land managers tools to maintain healthy ecosystems while supporting all the diverse ways we depend on public lands. It acknowledges a simple truth: conservation must be valued equally to all other land uses. 


Now there is growing pressure to rescind it.


Why This Matters


The environment around us is free-flowing, it's not confined to state borders or county lines. When mining operations contaminate watersheds in Northern California, it impacts the local businesses who depend on healthy rivers downstream, the agricultural communities that rely on clean water, and the families who've been camping along those waterways for generations. The Public Lands Rule recognized this interconnected reality and gave land managers agency to address problems before they spread across California's diverse landscapes, protecting the long-term viability of grazing allotments, recreation areas, and rural livelihoods that all depend on healthy public lands.


This interconnected reality is exactly why the Public Lands Rule matters. The Rule is designed to ensure that the places we depend on, whether for weekend camping trips, or cattle grazing, stay healthy enough to support these uses long-term. When an area becomes overgrazed and doesn't recover, access to those grazing allotments is permanently lost, reducing ranchers' ability to maintain their livelihoods and harming local food production. Poor use or overuse of our public lands creates ripples of negative impact that hurt all communities. 


The Rule's main objective is simple but revolutionary: make sure our public lands stay productive for everyone who depends on them, rather than degrade them. The Rule created practical tools that built in accountability and prioritized future generations' access to healthy public lands. 


Restoration Leases: 10-year agreements allowing a variety of entities such as, conservation groups, tribes, and nonprofits to restore damaged landscapes—fires restoration, restoring wildlife habitats and cleaning up abandoned mining sites that currently scar some of our most beautiful public lands.


Mitigation Leases: A tool that allows land users or other entities to offset impacts from their activities over specified time periods, creating partnerships between different land users and conservation groups to address environmental impacts on public lands. 


Strengthened Protection for Critical Areas: Clearer guidelines for protecting Areas of Critical Environmental Concern—the most special and fragile places that often provide the best wildlife viewing, the cleanest water sources, the most pristine camping experiences and the richest biodiversity.


The False Dichotomy: Multiple Use vs. Conservation 


The main argument being used to encourage the rollback of the Public Lands Rule is "multiple use", the legal principle requiring Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands to serve many different purposes. The current Administration claims the Public Lands Rule hinders multiple uses of public lands. Why? The Rule calls for restoring degraded areas and making science based decisions. Contrary to their actual meaning, the current Administration interprets "restoring" and "science based decisions" as "locking up land". Land locking, where access gets completely cut off, is a real concern in some areas—it prevents both recreation and grazing. However, land locking is not what the Public Lands Rule promotes. In reality, it is promoting land healing. 


Take grazing for example. The Rule empowers BLM to use restoration leases in conjunction with existing grazing permittees to restore degraded rangeland. Monitoring who is grazing where and the number of permits issued for specific areas is a means to ensure sustainable grazing and prevent overuse. Many ranchers and land managers supported the Rule because they understand that healthy land is productive land. Overgrazing and environmental damage hurt their livelihoods too. 


The same principle applies to fire recovery. When public lands are damaged by sweeping wildfires, there is a need for active restoration: replanting native vegetation, stabilizing soils, removing hazardous debris. Restoration has to take place before safe recreation, grazing and other uses can resume. At times, restoration requires temporarily limiting access to burned areas as they recover. The goal is to allow for our lands to recover and heal before we start depending on them again with our multiple uses. Land restoration is not just limited to grazing or extraction; it is essential for recovering from wildfires. 


Whether it's grazing, recreation, or extraction, the Public Lands Rule isn't about stopping these uses, it's about understanding that healthy ecosystems are prerequisites for multiple use, not obstacles to it. You can't have sustainable grazing on degraded rangeland, quality recreation in fire damaged landscapes, or responsible extraction without considering long-term impacts


We Are Public Stewards


The Public Lands Rule represents a historic shift in how we value conservation, its potential rollback is a setback. But the vision it represents, conservation as a form of legitimate multiple use, remains essential and is not gone. As stewards of these 245 million acres, we have the power to practice conservation in our own actions and advocacy. Every time we practice Leave No Trace, support local businesses that operate responsibly on public lands, and make our voices heard in land management decisions, we're building the foundation for balanced stewardship that benefits everyone. 


Our public lands belong to all of us, which means we each have the power, and responsibility, to be good stewards of the lands we love. 


-Bryan Pride (bpride@tuleyome.org)

Certified California Naturalist

Policy Director

RECENT ARTICLES

June 5, 2025
We extend our thanks and gratitude to Stephen McCord as he ends his tenure on the Tuleyome Board of Directors. Stephen has applied his energy and expertise to fulfilling Tuleyome’s mission for many years. In 2016 he managed the first Tuleyome mercury mine remediation project at the Corona/Twin Peaks Mine. He followed that with work on Tuleyome trail projects in the Knoxville Off-Highway Vehicle Area, riding all the trails on his own adventure motorcycle. As a Tuleyome representative, he’s taken many community members on hikes in Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument and the surrounding areas. Stephen has over 20 years of environmental engineering experience, in California and worldwide. He has overseen extensive projects in water quality field work, management and cleanup, and has applied his knowledge to policy development, analysis and technical support. In short, Stephen is a consummate environmental and water engineer, and he brought his expertise to Tuleyome’s many projects. In 2023 Stephen joined the Board of Directors and agreed to serve as President. He applied his supreme organizational skills to managing board duties and activities. He also brought an optimism to the board about what can be accomplished with foresight, good planning and collaboration. Stephen has been a tireless advocate for Tuleyome, keeping the board on task even while handling numerous other professional responsibilities. Fortunately, although he is stepping down from the board, he will continue to support Tuleyome’s mission in many other ways. -Kim Longworth, Lyndsay Dawkins and Bill Grabert Volunteer Tuleyome Board members 
By Geoff Benn June 5, 2025
A river otter making its way up the slide. Looking to take a break with some cute video content? This month we placed game cameras looking into an otter slide at Conaway Ranch. Otter slides are paths worn into riverbanks by repeated use by otters and other animals. The slides at Conaway are quite active, so we’ve been able to get some great footage, including otters, beavers, racoons, snakes, and more! 
By Kristie Ehrhardt June 5, 2025
You may have heard of Golden Mussels on the news or maybe at your local marina. They are a highly invasive and opportunistic bivalve species that has only recently been documented in North America. Native to China, Thailand, Korea, Laos, Vietnam, Indonesia and Cambodia, Golden Mussels ( Limnoperna fortunei ) have been documented in Hong Kong, Japan, Taiwan, Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Paraguay, Uruguay, and the United States. In fact, as of October 2024, their occurrence in the Sacramento - San Joaquin Delta and O’Neill Forebay in Merced County were the first known discoveries in North America. Golden Mussels are extremely opportunistic and can colonize fresh and brackish waters in bays, creeks, canals, lakes, rivers and other wetland areas with temperatures ranging from 41-95 degrees Fahrenheit. Golden Mussels are tolerant of pollution and can establish and reproduce in waterbodies with much lower calcium than Quagga and Zebra Mussels, making many more waterbodies in the state vulnerable to infestation. The Golden Mussels have extremely high reproduction rates and can reproduce during their first year of growth; each adult mussel can produce tens of thousands of free-floating veligers (larva) that will mature in the water column while flowing downstream until they are ready to settle. Due to their broad environmental tolerance, high reproductive rate, and free-floating life stage that allows for rapid dispersal, this alien species has become a threat to native fisheries and ecosystems. Golden Mussels range in color from light to dark golden to dark brown and can reach nearly two inches long and can live for two years. Adults form byssal threads, also known as mussel beards, which anchor them securely to natural and man-made substrates in varying depths of water. These threads are strong enough to withstand abrasive wave action and high flows. Golden mussels have been found attached to hard surfaces such as the submerged logs, rocks, hulls of boats, buoys, and other equipment as well as soft substrates and aquatic plants. The most common way invasive mussels such as Golden Mussels are transported between bodies of water is by hitchhiking on watercraft and other equipment. Invasive species such as Golden Mussels, can be introduced into formally unoccupied areas through ballast water of ocean-going ships, adults can be relocated by being attached to watercraft being moved from one body to water to another or nearly microscopic veligers can be moved by being in contained water within watercraft or other equipment. In areas where waterways are interconnected, Golden Mussel adults and veligers can move with the flow of water or watercraft going from one body of water to another. It is also possible that they move upstream in the stomach of fish – being undigestible by native fish and eventually passing through the fish. Golden Mussels are ultra-efficient filter feeders. When dense colonies of these organisms form, they consume substantial quantities of microscopic plants and animals that native fish, game fish and other aquatic species depend on to complete their life cycle and flourish. Additionally, Golden Mussels have been demonstrated to cause shifts in algal communities that favor species that produce Harmful Algae Blooms (HABs), resulting in more adverse impacts to the environment. The dense congregations of mussels not only restrains water movement by biofouling (obstructing) pipes, pumps, hydropower and irrigation facilities as well as damaging watercraft motors. Removal is continuous and costly to maintain operational function which results in economic impacts to the community. Community impacts as a result of Golden Mussels infestations include constraints on recreational waterbody usage such as mandatory inspections, boat quarantine periods, lake closures, and increased fees. Economic impacts may be seen as higher charges for water and power utilities to account for increased costs due to increased preventative maintenance frequency, infrastructure protection upgrades such as filters and strainers and other prevention devices such as Ultra Violet lights and repairs to infrastructure and facilities due to biofouling of Golden Mussels. To help curb the spread of Golden Mussels, the California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways asks that you Inspect all watercraft and equipment. Clean any visible mud, plants, fish or animals from watercraft and equipment. Drain all water, including from lower outboard unit, ballast, live-well, buckets, and anything else that contains water. Dry everything for at least five days or with a towel before reuse. Dispose of debris and unwanted bait, worms, and fish parts in the trash. Report any mussels or suspect invasive species you find to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife hotline at (866) 440-9530 or email: Invasives@wildlife.ca.gov and to the local marina manager or harbormaster. So far Golden Mussels have not been documented in any bodies of water within the Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument but just last Friday they were found on a boat attempting to launch in Lake Tahoe. Vessel quarantine periods and decontamination requirements vary throughout the state, so please contact the manager of the water body before you launch. If you observe Golden Mussels in California you are urged to immediately report your findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Invasive Species Program , or by email to Invasives@wildlife.ca.gov , or by telephone to (866) 440-9530. Clear, close-up photographs with an item for scale are encouraged to be submitted with your report. -Kristie Ehrhardt ( kehrhardt@tuleyome.org ) Tuleyome Land Conservation Program Manager