Policy Corner: USDA Reorganization and What It Means for California

Bryan Pride • September 11, 2025

What is the USDA Reorganization?

On July 24, 2025, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins announced a sweeping reorganization eliminating all nineForestService regional offices nationwide and consolidating USDA operations into five regional hubs in North Carolina, Missouri, Indiana, Colorado, and Utah. For California, the closest hub managing the state's agriculture will be Salt Lake City, Utah and forest resources will be Fort Collins, Colorado, over 500 miles from the California communities that depend on these services.


This reorganization comes at a terrible time. California has already lost substantial expertise and workforce even before this reorganization: Agricultural Research Service sites have lost 10-50% of their scientists, over 4,500 Forest Service firefighting positions remain vacant nationwide and 15,364 USDA employees have already taken voluntary resignation offers.


Rather than addressing these vacancies and strengthening support for California’s communities, this reorganization will exacerbate the loss of expertise and local knowledge that our communities depend on. 


Agricultural Impacts: Abandoning America's Food Producer

Despite producing $59.46 billion in sales annually and growing 70% of the nation's fruits and vegetables, under the reorganizing plan, California will no longer have a regional hub. The reorganization consolidates critical agricultural services away from California, including research, conservation assistance, and extension services. The scale of what's at risk cannot be overstated. California's agricultural sector employs more than 420,000 people and generates more than 400 commodities. Rural farming communities that depend on technical assistance from USDA offices are at risk of losing essential support. Centralizing these services in distant states creates response delays during critical planting, harvest, or emergency situations, which ultimately hurts farmers and weakens California’s food systems. This reorganization is part of a broader pattern of the current Administration’s policies that are harming farmers across the country. 


Research Station Consolidation: Losing Irreplaceable Expertise

The reorganization eliminates California's Region 5 Forest Service research office, a facility studying Mediterranean climate and chaparral ecosystems that oversees 18 national forests covering 20 million acres. This research directly informs wildfire management and climate adaptation strategies for California's unique environment, yet it will be consolidated to Fort Collins, Colorado.


This comes as California has already lost substantial research capacity. When experienced researchers leave, they take irreplaceable knowledge about California's fire behavior, drought adaptation, and ecosystem recovery, expertise that cannot be replaced by Colorado-based staff unfamiliar with Mediterranean climates. Colorado’s cold, dry continental climate with snowy winters holds no resemblance to California’s Mediterranean climate of wet winters and dry summers. The climate differences mean that Colorado-based researchers cannot understand the unique fire patterns, drought cycles and ecosystem management challenges that define California's forests and agriculture systems.


The partnership between California universities and USDA research stations created the innovation pipeline that made California agriculture globally competitive. Graduate students conducted fieldwork at research stations, faculty collaborated on applied research, and findings flowed directly to farmers. Moving research to Colorado breaks this pipeline entirely, just when California faces its most complex agricultural and climate challenges.


The Locality Pay Problem: Devaluing Public Service

USDA justifies hub locations partly on lower federal locality pay rates, prioritizing cost savings over mission effectiveness. However, if this rationale is an influential factor, Fresno, California would be a top contender for an agriculture hub because Fresno’s locality pay is 17.65% which is nearly identical to that of Salt Lake City, which is 17.06% and is a lower locality pay than Fort Collins, Indianapolis and Raleigh. This makes Fresno an obvious choice for a western hub if cost savings truly drove the decision making.


Federal agencies already struggle with recruitment and retention. Using lower locality pay further undermines efforts to attract qualified professionals by reducing compensation competitiveness, damaging employee morale, and creating retention problems.


California's federal employees possess decades of experience managing complex fire seasons, diverse agricultural systems, and unique ecosystems. This expertise requires years to develop and cannot be easily replaced. Effective management requires attracting and retaining qualified professionals who understand local conditions, not relocating operations based solely on salary savings.


What We're Really Losing

California faces unique wildfire and climate challenges that require specialized knowledge. The reorganization dismantles the infrastructure that allows federal expertise to reach the communities who need it.


Secretary Rollins says the reorganization will bring services "closer to its customers," but for California farmers and forest communities, the closest hub will be hundreds of miles away. The promise of improved efficiency rings hollow when similar relocations have consistently resulted in massive knowledge loss and service disruptions.


Rather than building agencies back up, this reorganization dismantles the infrastructure that allows federal expertise to reach the communities who need it. California produces more agricultural revenue than most entire regions of the country, yet this reorganization treats California as an afterthought.


Thank you to everyone who submitted comments during the initial public comment period and exercised your voice about agencies established to serve the California public. We have recently learned that USDA has decided to reopen the comment period through September 30th, you still have time to submit comments. Tuleyome will continue monitoring this issue and providing updates as more information becomes available.

RECENT ARTICLES

Congratulations, Nate!

March 5, 2026
Tuleyome is pleased to announce that Nate Lillge has been promoted to Program Director where he will oversee Tuleyome’s land conservation and stewardship program and our adventures, outreach and education program.  Nate joined Tuleyome ten years ago. A talented manager with a passion for the outdoors and sharing it with others, Nate has been key to Tuleyome’s successes, from the design, building and maintenance of some of our region’s iconic trails to the expansion of Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument with the addition of Molok Luyuk. Nate is a true partner to all, dedicated to this place and its communities, an authority on the region, and a true champion of the land. Nate has spent his career dedicated to the experience and stewardship of place. Fun, knowledgeable, dedicated and brilliant, Tuleyome welcomes our new Program Director, Nate Lillge.

Policy Corner: Congress Is Using a Little-Known Law to Remove Your Voice from Public Land Management

By Bryan Pride • March 5, 2026
Just months after we rejected the notion of selling off our public lands, some in Congress are at it again. This time, the attack is more calculated; bypassing the communities, tribal nations, and local stakeholders who spent years shaping how our public lands are managed. Whether you hunt, fish, farm, hike, or simply love the outdoors, Congress is now overriding your voice and threatening the legal foundation that protects your access to these lands. What is the Congressional Review Act? The Congressional Review Act (CRA) was passed in 1996. It required that all federal agency “rules” be submitted to Congress and gave Congress 60 days to pass legislation to disapprove the rule. If Congress takes no action, the rule goes into effect. For nearly 30 years, the CRA was used sparingly, only used to review federal regulations. But Congress has now started using the CRA in a new and unprecedented way: to overturn Bureau of Land Management Resource Management Plans (RMPs) and National Monument Management Plans ; the blueprints that guide how our public lands are managed and protected. Resource Management Plans (RMPs) and National Monument Management Plans aren’t just paperwork. They are the result of years of public engagement that include tribal consultation, community input and scientific analysis that determine how millions of acres of public land are used and protected. These plans govern everything from recreation use and grazing permits to oil and gas leases, conservation designations, and wildfire management. Why this is everyone’s problem For decades, neither BLM nor Congress considered these plans to be “rules” subject to congressional review. They were understood as long-term planning documents: overarching guidance for how agencies managed land, embracing principles appropriate to the particular lands and their characteristics. Land management plans have never, in the 50 years we’ve been preparing and following them, been considered rules. That is, not until this Congress. Since October 2025, Congress has rescinded five BLM management plans covering tens of millions of acres in Alaska, Montana, and North Dakota and overturned a decision that protected the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge from oil and gas leasing. By treating these plans as “rules” subject to the CRA, Congress has called into question the legal validity of every management plan finalized since 1996. At threat are 123 BLM plans and 176 active Forest Service plans covering over 166 million acres, 14 of them are in California, including those governing Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument and other lands in the region An Attack on One Monument is an Attack on All The CRA threat has now reached our National Monuments. As of February 26, 2026, Senator Mike Lee formally began the process of fast-tracking the destruction of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Management Plan in Utah, the first time the CRA has ever been applied to a National Monument. The Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Management Plan took years to develop. BLM engaged in extensive government-to-government consultation with tribal nations who have lived in and around the monument since time immemorial; nations whose ancestral cultural sites are woven throughout the monument’s 1.9 million acres. Local governments, ranchers, outfitters, scientists, conservationists, and community members all had a seat at the table. The result is a plan that balances wildlife protection, outdoor access, dark night skies, grazing, and cultural preservation, reflecting the full breadth of what makes Grand Staircase-Escalante, known as the “Science Monument”, so remarkable. What makes the decision particularly alarming is the irreversibility. Once Congress rescinds a management plan under the CRA, BLM is barred from issuing another plan that is “substantially the same.” without another act of Congress. Years of tribal consultation, community collaboration, and scientific analysis cannot simply be redone, and the protections that came from that work cannot be easily restored. The monument’s geology, fossils, wildlife habitat, grazing access, and cultural resources would all be left in a management vacuum, vulnerable to illegal vehicle use, landscape-level clearcutting of native pinyon-juniper forests, and unchecked extractive activities. This is the pattern. What happens in Utah, Alaska, Montana, and North Dakota today sets the precedent for what can happen at Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument and every other monument. Once Congress establishes that Monument Management Plans are fair game to be overridden through congressional review, no monument, no matter how beloved, no matter how many years of work went into its protection is truly safe. An attack on one monument is an attack on all of them. What Tuleyome is doing about it We’re working with a nationwide coalition to prevent further misuse of the CRA. We are supporting legislation clarifying that land management plans are not subject to the CRA. We are ensuring that our elected officials know how much the public supports public lands and wants them protected. We are committed to fighting back, working alongside community members, tribal nations, and coalition partners to keep our public lands in public hands. We will continue to monitor developments and keep you informed. What you can do about it. Contact your representatives and let them know that public lands belong to all of us, and decisions about how they are managed should stay rooted in our communities, not decided in Washington D.C. Ask them to vote against resolutions that use the CRA to roll back our resource management or monument management plans. Monitor Tuleyome’s social media to stay up to date on fast moving issues and see how you can help. Connect with efforts to protect the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Management Plan. Stay tuned. We’ll let you know what’s happening and how you can make a difference.

Monumental Questions - Monumental Vegetable?

By Kristie Ehrhardt • March 5, 2026
Yes, indeed! Although I do not advocate for eating things you find in nature, there is one plant in particular that is both lovely to look at and to nosh on. As you may have heard, we here at Tuleyome are beginning to schedule wildflower tours of our very own “deep home place”, the Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument (Monument). One of the plants that is a reliable observation, easily identifiable and flowering right now as we speak is miner’s lettuce! I must first say please do not harvest miner’s lettuce from the Monument as it is not only delightful for us to look at, it is an important food source for caterpillars and butterflies. Miner’s lettuce ( Claytonia perfoliata ) belongs to the Purslane family - Montiaceae. Claytonia is one of 17 genera and 230 known species that range from small, herbaceous plants to woody shrubs. Many of the genera of Montiaceae are edible and that does include miner’s lettuce. Miner’s lettuce is native to western North America from Mexico to as far north as British Columbia. Apparently European explorers liked it so much that they carried it back to Europe with them in the 18th century and cultivated it at the Kew Botanical Gardens in London, It has since naturalized throughout the natural landscape. Utilized by Native Americans for generations, miner’s lettuce is a valuable source of vitamins and minerals. During the gold rush, settlers ate it to prevent scurvy, hence the clever common name. According to a study published in the Journal of the American Dietetic Association, a mere 100 grams of miner’s lettuce, about the size of a dinner plate, contains about 35% of your recommended daily amount of vitamin C, 22% of vitamin A and about ten percent of the iron required daily. It also contains protein and the entire plant, with the exception of the roots, is edible, even the itty bitty flowers. Young stems are tender and sweet while the succulent leaves have a bright, fresh taste and seem to melt in your mouth. Strangely enough, we found out last weekend that domestic goats do not care for it; apparently chewing on the rope holding the fence panels together was more tantalizing. It’s also been noted that deer tend to ignore it as well. Entire pages have been dedicated to the plant lauding it for its yumminess in salads, sandwiches and even sushi. Although it is delicious raw, personal experience speaking here, with a very light salad dressing or even just a splash of lemon juice; it can also be cooked as used as you would spinach. However, like spinach, the plant can contain toxic amounts of sodium oxalate which may potentially promote kidney stones among other terrible things. Miner’s lettuce is common in the spring and can usually be found in a moist, shady environment. After a good rain it may pop up in sunny areas but the best stands are usually in well-shaded, cool areas. As the temperatures rise, the plants in the sunny areas begin to dry up and turn blush pink to a deep red. Plants in dryer locations have a bitter taste. It is easy to identify with its basal rosette, many long petioles and leaves that wrap completely around the stem looking like saucers or little lily pads. In young plants these leaves will be bright green and heart-shaped but as the plants mature, they become more rounded or cup-shaped. Mature plants may also have tiny, dainty white to light pink flowers dangling from the center of the saucer-shaped leaf. The plant usually flowers from February to May or even June if conditions are right. While I most definitely do not promote harvesting plants in native or natural ecosystems, miner’s lettuce can easily be cultivated in your own backyard! The best flavor comes from a cool, shady, damp location so plan for an early crop. But, it can also tolerate full sun if the soil remains good and moist. Miner’s lettuce also seems to favor occasional minor ground disturbance and growing it as a seasonal ground cover can be pleasing to the eye and the tummy! Miner’s lettuce can be planted in late summer to early fall in mild climates and harvested all winter. It can also be sown in the spring and with apple water be harvested until the summer heat arrives. The plants can be cut and allowed to regrow several times a season as long as they are eventually allowed to finally flower and set seed as they are an annual species and reproduce by seed. Miner’s lettuce can be used in any recipe that calls for fresh, steamed or cooked greens. Eat your vegetables! Next time you’re hiking in our favorite Monument (you know which one!) keep an eye out for miner’s lettuce and give it a nod. You might find it in several of the habitat types there including chaparral, oak woodlands, riparian and maybe even a parking lot!