Science Corner - Pacific Flyway

Kristie Ehrhardt • December 5, 2024

Using data that was collected over a span of many years from hunters returning the leg bands from harvested waterfowl, biologists in the mid-1930’s were able to determine that migrating birds followed four different geographical routes, or flyways, during spring and fall migrations throughout North America. Today, these long-established flyways still accurately represent the major north-south migration passageways used by billions of migrating birds. In 1947 the flyway concept was formally adopted to help manage resources for migratory birds within the United States. Named for their geographic regions, the four flyways are the Pacific Flyway, the Central Flyway, the Mississippi Flyway and the Atlantic Flyway.


Because each of the flyways has unique biological and ecological qualities, state and federal wildlife agencies have adopted the flyway classification to help monitor and protect resources within the United States for migrating birds. California is a vital part of the Pacific Flyway which is approximately 4,000 miles long and 1,000 miles wide. It is utilized by waterbirds, shorebirds and songbirds and extends from the Arctic tundra in Alaska south to Patagonia in South America. In the United States, the Pacific Flyway includes the western states of Alaska, California, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Washington and the portions of Colorado, Montana, New Mexico and Wyoming that occur west of the Rocky Mountains. The Pacific Flyway alone is estimated to host over one billion (!) birds annually.


Each flyway is jointly managed by biologists from state and federal agencies (California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the United States Department of Fish and Wildlife) as well as other land and wildlife management agencies, university faculty and staff and interested non-profit organizations such as Ducks Unlimited and the Audubon Society. Management plans are developed with input from all United States agencies involved as well as Canada and Mexico. Under the authorities of bilateral treaties, the federal governments of the United States, Canada and Mexico are responsible for the conservation and protections of the migratory birds in North America. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) affords protection to listed migratory species and allows individual states to enforce their own conservation rules and regulations, including game regulations, as long as they do not conflict with the federal regulations. Under the MBTA, state protections are allowed to be more stringent than the federal protections but they are not allowed to be more lenient. The MBTA was enacted to help protect all migratory bird species that are native to the US and its territories but does not cover those species that were introduced such as European Starlings or House Sparrows.


California’s wetlands and rice fields are a critically important refueling, resting and nesting spot for birds traveling along the Pacific Flyway. Sadly, California has lost 95% of its historic wetlands yet the Central Valley remains the most important wintering area for waterfowl in the Pacific Flyway. Wetlands and rice fields here support about 60% of the total population of migratory birds by providing open water, food and shelter. Some species such as Snow Geese and Greater White-fronted Geese migrate south to winter in California and other species such as Swainson’s Hawks migrate north from Argentina to summer and breed here in California. Exactly how these birds accomplish such a hulking pilgrimage is not completely understood. Some biologists believe that birds use navigational cues from the sun, moon and stars while others believe that they follow geographic landmarks such as mountain ranges and bodies of water and still others believe that birds use the Earth’s magnetic field to help navigate. Recent studies indicate instinct and learned behavior also may play a role in birds ability to migrate across multiple countries. What we do know is these birds take the same routes year after year and species’ arrival can be predicted fairly accurately.



There are many significant stops for the birds along the Pacific Flyway. Some of them are refueling and resting stopovers while others, like the Central Valley’s rice fields, are the termination of their seasonal journey. One of the closest hotspots to view these miraculous birds that made a miraculous journey is the Vic Fazio Wildlife Area in the Yolo Bypass. If you’d like to go visit check out https://birdinghotspots.org/hotspot/L443535 and don’t forget your camera and binoculars!


-Kristie Ehrhardt (kehrhardt@tuleyome.org)

Tuleyome Land Conservation Program Manager

RECENT ARTICLES

June 5, 2025
We extend our thanks and gratitude to Stephen McCord as he ends his tenure on the Tuleyome Board of Directors. Stephen has applied his energy and expertise to fulfilling Tuleyome’s mission for many years. In 2016 he managed the first Tuleyome mercury mine remediation project at the Corona/Twin Peaks Mine. He followed that with work on Tuleyome trail projects in the Knoxville Off-Highway Vehicle Area, riding all the trails on his own adventure motorcycle. As a Tuleyome representative, he’s taken many community members on hikes in Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument and the surrounding areas. Stephen has over 20 years of environmental engineering experience, in California and worldwide. He has overseen extensive projects in water quality field work, management and cleanup, and has applied his knowledge to policy development, analysis and technical support. In short, Stephen is a consummate environmental and water engineer, and he brought his expertise to Tuleyome’s many projects. In 2023 Stephen joined the Board of Directors and agreed to serve as President. He applied his supreme organizational skills to managing board duties and activities. He also brought an optimism to the board about what can be accomplished with foresight, good planning and collaboration. Stephen has been a tireless advocate for Tuleyome, keeping the board on task even while handling numerous other professional responsibilities. Fortunately, although he is stepping down from the board, he will continue to support Tuleyome’s mission in many other ways. -Kim Longworth, Lyndsay Dawkins and Bill Grabert Volunteer Tuleyome Board members 
By Geoff Benn June 5, 2025
A river otter making its way up the slide. Looking to take a break with some cute video content? This month we placed game cameras looking into an otter slide at Conaway Ranch. Otter slides are paths worn into riverbanks by repeated use by otters and other animals. The slides at Conaway are quite active, so we’ve been able to get some great footage, including otters, beavers, racoons, snakes, and more! 
By Bryan Pride June 5, 2025
Since April 2024, America's public lands had something they'd never had before: a rule that treated conservation as equal to all other land uses. The Public Lands Rule , introduced by the Biden Administration, formally recognized conservation as a legitimate practice of multiple use, putting conservation on equal footing with recreation, grazing, and resource extraction. Built on decades of management experience and guided by science, data, and Indigenous knowledge, it gives land managers tools to maintain healthy ecosystems while supporting all the diverse ways we depend on public lands. It acknowledges a simple truth: conservation must be valued equally to all other land uses. Now there is growing pressure to rescind it. Why This Matters The environment around us is free-flowing, it's not confined to state borders or county lines. When mining operations contaminate watersheds in Northern California, it impacts the local businesses who depend on healthy rivers downstream, the agricultural communities that rely on clean water, and the families who've been camping along those waterways for generations. The Public Lands Rule recognized this interconnected reality and gave land managers agency to address problems before they spread across California's diverse landscapes, protecting the long-term viability of grazing allotments, recreation areas, and rural livelihoods that all depend on healthy public lands. This interconnected reality is exactly why the Public Lands Rule matters. The Rule is designed to ensure that the places we depend on, whether for weekend camping trips, or cattle grazing, stay healthy enough to support these uses long-term. When an area becomes overgrazed and doesn't recover, access to those grazing allotments is permanently lost, reducing ranchers' ability to maintain their livelihoods and harming local food production. Poor use or overuse of our public lands creates ripples of negative impact that hurt all communities. The Rule's main objective is simple but revolutionary: make sure our public lands stay productive for everyone who depends on them, rather than degrade them. The Rule created practical tools that built in accountability and prioritized future generations' access to healthy public lands. Restoration Leases : 10-year agreements allowing a variety of entities such as, conservation groups, tribes, and nonprofits to restore damaged landscapes—fires restoration, restoring wildlife habitats and cleaning up abandoned mining sites that currently scar some of our most beautiful public lands. Mitigation Leases : A tool that allows land users or other entities to offset impacts from their activities over specified time periods, creating partnerships between different land users and conservation groups to address environmental impacts on public lands. Strengthened Protection for Critical Areas : Clearer guidelines for protecting Areas of Critical Environmental Concern—the most special and fragile places that often provide the best wildlife viewing, the cleanest water sources, the most pristine camping experiences and the richest biodiversity. The False Dichotomy: Multiple Use vs. Conservation The main argument being used to encourage the rollback of the Public Lands Rule is " multiple use ", the legal principle requiring Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands to serve many different purposes. The current Administration claims the Public Lands Rule hinders multiple uses of public lands. Why? The Rule calls for restoring degraded areas and making science based decisions. Contrary to their actual meaning, the current Administration interprets "restoring" and "science based decisions" as "locking up land". Land locking, where access gets completely cut off, is a real concern in some areas—it prevents both recreation and grazing. However, land locking is not what the Public Lands Rule promotes. In reality, it is promoting land healing. Take grazing for example. The Rule empowers BLM to use restoration leases in conjunction with existing grazing permittees to restore degraded rangeland. Monitoring who is grazing where and the number of permits issued for specific areas is a means to ensure sustainable grazing and prevent overuse. Many ranchers and land managers supported the Rule because they understand that healthy land is productive land. Overgrazing and environmental damage hurt their livelihoods too. The same principle applies to fire recovery. When public lands are damaged by sweeping wildfires, there is a need for active restoration: replanting native vegetation, stabilizing soils, removing hazardous debris. Restoration has to take place before safe recreation, grazing and other uses can resume. At times, restoration requires temporarily limiting access to burned areas as they recover. The goal is to allow for our lands to recover and heal before we start depending on them again with our multiple uses. Land restoration is not just limited to grazing or extraction; it is essential for recovering from wildfires. Whether it's grazing, recreation, or extraction, the Public Lands Rule isn't about stopping these uses, it's about understanding that healthy ecosystems are prerequisites for multiple use, not obstacles to it. You can't have sustainable grazing on degraded rangeland, quality recreation in fire damaged landscapes, or responsible extraction without considering long-term impacts We Are Public Stewards The Public Lands Rule represents a historic shift in how we value conservation, its potential rollback is a setback. But the vision it represents, conservation as a form of legitimate multiple use, remains essential and is not gone. As stewards of these 245 million acres, we have the power to practice conservation in our own actions and advocacy. Every time we practice Leave No Trace, support local businesses that operate responsibly on public lands, and make our voices heard in land management decisions, we're building the foundation for balanced stewardship that benefits everyone. Our public lands belong to all of us, which means we each have the power, and responsibility, to be good stewards of the lands we love. -Bryan Pride ( bpride@tuleyome.org ) Certified California Naturalist Policy Director