Science Corner - Pacific Flyway

Kristie Ehrhardt • December 5, 2024

Using data that was collected over a span of many years from hunters returning the leg bands from harvested waterfowl, biologists in the mid-1930’s were able to determine that migrating birds followed four different geographical routes, or flyways, during spring and fall migrations throughout North America. Today, these long-established flyways still accurately represent the major north-south migration passageways used by billions of migrating birds. In 1947 the flyway concept was formally adopted to help manage resources for migratory birds within the United States. Named for their geographic regions, the four flyways are the Pacific Flyway, the Central Flyway, the Mississippi Flyway and the Atlantic Flyway.


Because each of the flyways has unique biological and ecological qualities, state and federal wildlife agencies have adopted the flyway classification to help monitor and protect resources within the United States for migrating birds. California is a vital part of the Pacific Flyway which is approximately 4,000 miles long and 1,000 miles wide. It is utilized by waterbirds, shorebirds and songbirds and extends from the Arctic tundra in Alaska south to Patagonia in South America. In the United States, the Pacific Flyway includes the western states of Alaska, California, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Washington and the portions of Colorado, Montana, New Mexico and Wyoming that occur west of the Rocky Mountains. The Pacific Flyway alone is estimated to host over one billion (!) birds annually.


Each flyway is jointly managed by biologists from state and federal agencies (California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the United States Department of Fish and Wildlife) as well as other land and wildlife management agencies, university faculty and staff and interested non-profit organizations such as Ducks Unlimited and the Audubon Society. Management plans are developed with input from all United States agencies involved as well as Canada and Mexico. Under the authorities of bilateral treaties, the federal governments of the United States, Canada and Mexico are responsible for the conservation and protections of the migratory birds in North America. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) affords protection to listed migratory species and allows individual states to enforce their own conservation rules and regulations, including game regulations, as long as they do not conflict with the federal regulations. Under the MBTA, state protections are allowed to be more stringent than the federal protections but they are not allowed to be more lenient. The MBTA was enacted to help protect all migratory bird species that are native to the US and its territories but does not cover those species that were introduced such as European Starlings or House Sparrows.


California’s wetlands and rice fields are a critically important refueling, resting and nesting spot for birds traveling along the Pacific Flyway. Sadly, California has lost 95% of its historic wetlands yet the Central Valley remains the most important wintering area for waterfowl in the Pacific Flyway. Wetlands and rice fields here support about 60% of the total population of migratory birds by providing open water, food and shelter. Some species such as Snow Geese and Greater White-fronted Geese migrate south to winter in California and other species such as Swainson’s Hawks migrate north from Argentina to summer and breed here in California. Exactly how these birds accomplish such a hulking pilgrimage is not completely understood. Some biologists believe that birds use navigational cues from the sun, moon and stars while others believe that they follow geographic landmarks such as mountain ranges and bodies of water and still others believe that birds use the Earth’s magnetic field to help navigate. Recent studies indicate instinct and learned behavior also may play a role in birds ability to migrate across multiple countries. What we do know is these birds take the same routes year after year and species’ arrival can be predicted fairly accurately.



There are many significant stops for the birds along the Pacific Flyway. Some of them are refueling and resting stopovers while others, like the Central Valley’s rice fields, are the termination of their seasonal journey. One of the closest hotspots to view these miraculous birds that made a miraculous journey is the Vic Fazio Wildlife Area in the Yolo Bypass. If you’d like to go visit check out https://birdinghotspots.org/hotspot/L443535 and don’t forget your camera and binoculars!


-Kristie Ehrhardt (kehrhardt@tuleyome.org)

Tuleyome Land Conservation Program Manager

RECENT ARTICLES

By Nate Lillge August 6, 2025
Bill Grabert is stepping down from his position as treasurer on Tuleyome’s volunteer Board of Directors – we thank him for his many years of service! Bill first joined Tuleyome as a staff member in 2016. His nature-based teaching influenced many youth over the years with school field trips throughout the Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument region, from Redbud Trail to Conaway Ranch. As part of Tuleyome’s team of instructors for the California Certified Naturalist program, Bill inspired adults to care for the region. His love of the area began as soon as he graduated from college and began working as a geologist in Lake County. Bill has devoted his diverse knowledge and skillset to care for, steward, and enjoy California’s northern Inner Coast Range Mountains for many years. He will be missed on the Board but we look forward to seeing him on the trails! -Nate Lillge (Adventures and Engagement Director)  and Lyndsay Dawkins (Volunteer Tuleyome Board President)
By Bryan Pride August 6, 2025
Fifty-eight and a half million acres of America's wildest forests have been protected for nearly 25 years by the Roadless Rule, a conservation cornerstone that could soon disappear. Established in 2001, the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (RACR) , more commonly known as the Roadless Rule, designated "Inventoried Roadless Areas" (IRAs) across our nation's forests, prohibiting new roads from being built. Now, USDA Secretary Rollins wants to rescind it . From Alaska to California, the losses from this rollback would be massive. In Alaska, 92% of the Tongass National Forest could lose protection, threatening one of the world's most pristine ecosystems and the indigenous communities who call it home. California would lose protections across 4.4 million acres spanning 21 national forests , which has the potential to impact treasured places like Inyo, Shasta-Trinity, and the Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument. Rule Born from Necessity, Not Ideology The Roadless Rule traces back to 1998, when U.S. Forest Service Chief Mike Dombeck saw the agency's vast road system as a major environmental and fiscal problem . To put this in perspective: the Forest Service maintains eight times more miles of road than the Interstate Highway System. The agency had too many roads to properly maintain for safety and environmental purposes, with poorly maintained roads contributing to erosion and other harms across national forests. The road maintenance backlog had ballooned to $8.4 billion while the agency received only 20% of the funding needed to maintain roads to environmental and safety standards. Dombeck proposed a moratorium on road construction in undeveloped forest areas across most of the National Forest System. The agency adopted an 18-month moratorium in February 1999 pending completion of an overall road management plan. Later that year, the agency undertook a rule making process to provide long-term administrative protection for roadless areas. The Forest Service conducted an extensive public involvement process that produced 1.7 million comments , with the majority favoring a strong national policy protecting roadless areas. The resulting Roadless Rule was not and is still not a blanket ban: it makes exceptions to allow access to non-federal land inholdings and pre-existing mineral leases, and allows logging to reduce fire risk, improve habitat or aid in the recovery of endangered species. What began as a fiscally prudent solution to an unwieldy road network became a cornerstone of forest conservation, one that Americans overwhelmingly supported then and continue to support today. The Administration's Claims vs. Reality According to USDA Secretary Rollins , the rule is “overly restrictive”, hinders fire prevention and responsible timber production, therefore the Rule poses “real harm to millions of acres of our national forests.” Rollins linked rescinding the Rule with Presidential Executive Order 14192, "Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation .” The reality is different. Rollins' claim ignores what's actually at stake. Roadless areas are essential ecosystems that provide clean air and water while keeping wilderness intact. They also serve as critical refuges for wildlife; 57% of America's most vulnerable species depend on roadless areas for habitat. For the 156 million Americans who visit national forests annually, these areas offer irreplaceable backcountry recreation experiences. Most strikingly, the administration's fire prevention argument is backwards. Scientific research reveals that 88% of wildfires are human-caused , and 95% of these fires start within half a mile of a road. Areas closest to roads experience 53% more fires than would occur by random chance. Less than 3% of wildfires start in wilderness areas more than a mile from roads. This research indicates that more roads through our forests are more likely to increase fires and would outweigh the effects of improving fire containment. While the administration claims roads improve fire response, fire management teams consistently identify inadequate resources and personnel shortages, not roads , as the primary barriers to effective wildfire management . Rather than building roads that increase fire risk, fire management experts advocate for investing in cultural and prescribed burns, fire mitigation and forest restoration, proven approaches that are underfunded but key to preventing future fires and reducing fire magnitude. What's Next? Rescinding the Roadless Rule will require a public comment period that has yet to be announced. This is when we can all share our views. Tuleyome will be following this issue closely and will be commenting. For more information on the Roadless Rule and how to participate in the public comment process or other advocacy opportunities, contact B ryan Pr ide .
By Kristie Ehrhardt August 6, 2025
The short answer is honestly, pretty much anywhere! Because the 344,476 acre Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument (the Monument) is located in the rural areas of Colusa, Glenn, Lake, Mendocino, Napa, Solano and Yolo counties you will have a great view of the dark night sky, free from urban light pollution from virtually anywhere within its boundaries! The Monument is an easy drive from not only the metropolitan Sacramento area but also from the San Francisco Bay Area as well as the North Bay communities making it an easy day trip. If you’re here especially for the Perseid meteor shower though it might be a very long day since best viewing happens between the hours of midnight and early morning. If you’re adventurous and up for an all-nighter, be certain to pack plenty of water and snacks and be sure to pull over only where it is safe and you’re not blocking a road, especially when it’s dark. Also always keep safety in mind and look out for wildlife as the Monument is home to black bears, mountain lions, coyotes, tule elk and bobcats that may be traveling through the area as well. If you’d like to stay a night (or several), there are multiple developed campgrounds to choose from inside the Monument boundaries. If you’re up camping, check out The Blue Oaks Campground, Indian Valley Campground, Hunting Creek Campground, Deer Valley Campground, Lower Nye Campground, West Crocket Campground or Kowalski Camping area just to name a few of the sites available for overnight stays. Before you go though, please do check with the United States Forest Service or the Bureau of Land Management websites for details on the particular camping area you’re interested in as well as current conditions, requirements and fire restrictions. The Monument also offers primitive camping in the three wilderness areas located within the Monument boundaries. Cache Creek Wilderness, Cedar Roughs Wilderness and Snow Mountain Wilderness present nearly unlimited opportunities for dispersed camping or backcountry camping (areas located outside of designated campgrounds). Although camping is allowed and encouraged, these areas have no amenities such as tables, toilets, available water or waste removal and require you to pack out all trash and waste. There are no motorized vehicles allowed within Wilderness areas and they provide places for deep solitude with nature. Camping in Wilderness areas or other dispersed camping areas require visitors to understand and follow the Leave No Trace principles of outdoor recreating as well as planning ahead and knowing the area and what to pack. That said, other than the trees potentially blocking some of the night sky, you’re sure to avoid urban light pollution and have an unobstructed view of the night sky from practically anywhere within the Monument! -Kristie Ehrhardt ( kehrhardt@tuleyome.org ) Tuleyome Land Conservation Program Manager