Science Corner: Toxic Algae, aka Cyanobacteria

Kristie Ehrhardt • April 23, 2024
Photo by Centers for Disease Control

It seems to be a fairly familiar summer local news story; beware - toxic algae may be present in neighborhood ponds. Often called toxic algae, in reality, it’s not an algae at all that threatens our summer fun; it is Cyanobacteria.


Blue-green algae is often given credit for changing Earth’s lifeforms by being the first known organism able to photosynthesize and produce oxygen - the basis of life on Earth. They are among the oldest known organisms with fossil records that date back over two billion years ago. However, blue-green algae isn’t an algae at all, it’s actually a specialized bacteria and belongs to one of the most numerous taxon - Cyanobacteria. Named for their color and identified by their pigments and ability to photosynthesize, they are an extremely important component in marine food webs. They naturally occur in fresh, brackish and marine environments and thrive in low oxygen environments. This charismatic bacteria that kick-started life as we know it also contains lethal toxins that can also be deadly to pets, people, livestock and wildlife.


When the weather gets warm, isolated bodies of water such as retention basins, stock ponds and even unmaintained backyard pools and fountains become stagnant. Nutrients from over-fertilizing and then over-watering lawns and gardens run off and can collect in neighborhood retention ponds causing eutrophication - when organisms such as algae and bacteria reproduce explosively in warm, nutrient rich waters depleting the oxygen level and resulting in environmental degradation. The optimal conditions for a cyanobacteria bloom.


Warm, oxygen deprived water brimming with organisms that thrive in these conditions can result in an overabundance or “bloom”. Some cyanobacteria contain lethal toxins and when present in out of control numbers decompose aquatic ecosystems and can cause potentially lethal intoxication of pets, people, livestock and wildlife if they come into contact with it. Cyanobacteria is too small to be seen with the naked eye but when conditions result in a bloom, gobs of bacteria collect on the surface of the water and may look like mats of floating vegetation, foam, pond scum, or even a film of paint or oil floating on the water. Colors range from vibrant greens and blues to yellow, red and brown and sometimes the mats sink which causes the water to smell like rotting vegetation or worse.



Cyanobacteria can produce different types of toxins including liver and neurotoxins which can cause serious illness and sudden death. Dogs are especially at risk because of their infatuation with water, the stinkier the better (according to them). They can ingest cyanobacteria by drinking contaminated water directly or by simply fetching an object that was tossed into the water. They can also get it just from licking the bacteria-laden water off of their wet paws and fur. Depending on which type of toxin they were exposed to, symptoms can arise less than 15 minutes to a couple of days after exposure and may include diarrhea or vomiting, drooling or foaming at the mouth, jaundice and neurologic signs such as weakness, disorientation, seizures and difficulty breathing. If you know your dog was in contact with cyanobacteria, immediately and thoroughly rinse them off with fresh water and urgently get them to the veterinarian. If caught very early, the vet may be able to flush out the toxins.

To help keep you and your dog safe, keeping them leashed around water, especially if it appears dirty, foamy or has mats floating on top is always a good idea and bring plenty of fresh water for them to drink. Although not all cyanobacteria is harmful, there are no clinical tests, designated treatments or antidotes so when in doubt, keep them out.


-Kristie Ehrhardt (kehrhardt@tuleyome.org)

Tuleyome Land Conservation Program Manager

RECENT ARTICLES

June 5, 2025
We extend our thanks and gratitude to Stephen McCord as he ends his tenure on the Tuleyome Board of Directors. Stephen has applied his energy and expertise to fulfilling Tuleyome’s mission for many years. In 2016 he managed the first Tuleyome mercury mine remediation project at the Corona/Twin Peaks Mine. He followed that with work on Tuleyome trail projects in the Knoxville Off-Highway Vehicle Area, riding all the trails on his own adventure motorcycle. As a Tuleyome representative, he’s taken many community members on hikes in Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument and the surrounding areas. Stephen has over 20 years of environmental engineering experience, in California and worldwide. He has overseen extensive projects in water quality field work, management and cleanup, and has applied his knowledge to policy development, analysis and technical support. In short, Stephen is a consummate environmental and water engineer, and he brought his expertise to Tuleyome’s many projects. In 2023 Stephen joined the Board of Directors and agreed to serve as President. He applied his supreme organizational skills to managing board duties and activities. He also brought an optimism to the board about what can be accomplished with foresight, good planning and collaboration. Stephen has been a tireless advocate for Tuleyome, keeping the board on task even while handling numerous other professional responsibilities. Fortunately, although he is stepping down from the board, he will continue to support Tuleyome’s mission in many other ways. -Kim Longworth, Lyndsay Dawkins and Bill Grabert Volunteer Tuleyome Board members 
By Geoff Benn June 5, 2025
A river otter making its way up the slide. Looking to take a break with some cute video content? This month we placed game cameras looking into an otter slide at Conaway Ranch. Otter slides are paths worn into riverbanks by repeated use by otters and other animals. The slides at Conaway are quite active, so we’ve been able to get some great footage, including otters, beavers, racoons, snakes, and more! 
By Bryan Pride June 5, 2025
Since April 2024, America's public lands had something they'd never had before: a rule that treated conservation as equal to all other land uses. The Public Lands Rule , introduced by the Biden Administration, formally recognized conservation as a legitimate practice of multiple use, putting conservation on equal footing with recreation, grazing, and resource extraction. Built on decades of management experience and guided by science, data, and Indigenous knowledge, it gives land managers tools to maintain healthy ecosystems while supporting all the diverse ways we depend on public lands. It acknowledges a simple truth: conservation must be valued equally to all other land uses. Now there is growing pressure to rescind it. Why This Matters The environment around us is free-flowing, it's not confined to state borders or county lines. When mining operations contaminate watersheds in Northern California, it impacts the local businesses who depend on healthy rivers downstream, the agricultural communities that rely on clean water, and the families who've been camping along those waterways for generations. The Public Lands Rule recognized this interconnected reality and gave land managers agency to address problems before they spread across California's diverse landscapes, protecting the long-term viability of grazing allotments, recreation areas, and rural livelihoods that all depend on healthy public lands. This interconnected reality is exactly why the Public Lands Rule matters. The Rule is designed to ensure that the places we depend on, whether for weekend camping trips, or cattle grazing, stay healthy enough to support these uses long-term. When an area becomes overgrazed and doesn't recover, access to those grazing allotments is permanently lost, reducing ranchers' ability to maintain their livelihoods and harming local food production. Poor use or overuse of our public lands creates ripples of negative impact that hurt all communities. The Rule's main objective is simple but revolutionary: make sure our public lands stay productive for everyone who depends on them, rather than degrade them. The Rule created practical tools that built in accountability and prioritized future generations' access to healthy public lands. Restoration Leases : 10-year agreements allowing a variety of entities such as, conservation groups, tribes, and nonprofits to restore damaged landscapes—fires restoration, restoring wildlife habitats and cleaning up abandoned mining sites that currently scar some of our most beautiful public lands. Mitigation Leases : A tool that allows land users or other entities to offset impacts from their activities over specified time periods, creating partnerships between different land users and conservation groups to address environmental impacts on public lands. Strengthened Protection for Critical Areas : Clearer guidelines for protecting Areas of Critical Environmental Concern—the most special and fragile places that often provide the best wildlife viewing, the cleanest water sources, the most pristine camping experiences and the richest biodiversity. The False Dichotomy: Multiple Use vs. Conservation The main argument being used to encourage the rollback of the Public Lands Rule is " multiple use ", the legal principle requiring Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands to serve many different purposes. The current Administration claims the Public Lands Rule hinders multiple uses of public lands. Why? The Rule calls for restoring degraded areas and making science based decisions. Contrary to their actual meaning, the current Administration interprets "restoring" and "science based decisions" as "locking up land". Land locking, where access gets completely cut off, is a real concern in some areas—it prevents both recreation and grazing. However, land locking is not what the Public Lands Rule promotes. In reality, it is promoting land healing. Take grazing for example. The Rule empowers BLM to use restoration leases in conjunction with existing grazing permittees to restore degraded rangeland. Monitoring who is grazing where and the number of permits issued for specific areas is a means to ensure sustainable grazing and prevent overuse. Many ranchers and land managers supported the Rule because they understand that healthy land is productive land. Overgrazing and environmental damage hurt their livelihoods too. The same principle applies to fire recovery. When public lands are damaged by sweeping wildfires, there is a need for active restoration: replanting native vegetation, stabilizing soils, removing hazardous debris. Restoration has to take place before safe recreation, grazing and other uses can resume. At times, restoration requires temporarily limiting access to burned areas as they recover. The goal is to allow for our lands to recover and heal before we start depending on them again with our multiple uses. Land restoration is not just limited to grazing or extraction; it is essential for recovering from wildfires. Whether it's grazing, recreation, or extraction, the Public Lands Rule isn't about stopping these uses, it's about understanding that healthy ecosystems are prerequisites for multiple use, not obstacles to it. You can't have sustainable grazing on degraded rangeland, quality recreation in fire damaged landscapes, or responsible extraction without considering long-term impacts We Are Public Stewards The Public Lands Rule represents a historic shift in how we value conservation, its potential rollback is a setback. But the vision it represents, conservation as a form of legitimate multiple use, remains essential and is not gone. As stewards of these 245 million acres, we have the power to practice conservation in our own actions and advocacy. Every time we practice Leave No Trace, support local businesses that operate responsibly on public lands, and make our voices heard in land management decisions, we're building the foundation for balanced stewardship that benefits everyone. Our public lands belong to all of us, which means we each have the power, and responsibility, to be good stewards of the lands we love. -Bryan Pride ( bpride@tuleyome.org ) Certified California Naturalist Policy Director