Tuleyome's Science Corner - Paper Wasps and Yellowjackets

Kristie Ehrhardt • September 21, 2023

Paper Wasp and Nest

The Sacramento region is home to at two very common types of social wasps (wasps that live together in a community); paper wasps and yellowjackets. Both yellowjackets and paper wasps belong to the family Vespidae which contains about 1,100 species. Yellowjackets belong to the subfamily Vespinae which contains two genuses (Vespula and Dolichovespala). Paper wasps belong to the subfamily Polistinae which contains approximately 300 species worldwide, 22 of which are in California and belong to the genus Polistes.


Yellowjackets and paper wasps are commonly confused and misidentified because they look quite similar, however there are some notable differences if you don’t mind getting pretty close to them. Yellow jackets are typically black with yellow markings, are slightly less than an inch long and appear chunkier lacking the very tapered “wasp waist” that paper wasps display. Paper wasps are slightly bigger than yellowjackets, dark brown with yellow markings and have orange-tipped antennae and long rear legs that dangle behind them in flight. Both yellowjackets and paper wasps build nests out of paper which consists of chewed plant material, wood and saliva. Both begin nest construction which is made of rows of individual hexagonal cells in the early spring as the weather warms and the queen has emerged from hibernation. Depending on the species, yellowjacket nests can be underground often in abandoned rodent burrows (sometimes this species is called “meat bees”) while other species build a suspended nest from a structure or inside the walls of a building. Generally, yellowjacket nests they are much larger than paper wasp nests as the colonies can host many thousands of individuals and ends of the cells are sealed with a paper envelope so the embryo is not visible. Paper wasp nests are smaller with open hexagonal cells and they are always attached to a structure by a small stalk or pedicel and look like a tiny, hanging umbrella. Some species of paper wasps manufacture a chemical that keeps ants from crossing the pedicel and accessing their larvae. Colonies of paper wasps are much smaller and may only support 100 to 200 individuals. Rather than build a single large nest, paper wasps use several nest sites which may include the eaves of a house or shed, outdoor birdhouses, benches, grills and other outdoor structures and shrubbery.


I recently learned most wasp species, yellowjackets and paper wasps included, play an important role in biological pest control. In the early spring as wasp colonies are growing, they prey on species that impact crops such as caterpillars, aphids, beetle larvae and flies. In late summer and early fall the colonies forage on nectar to feed the queen and workers. As a result, they are also important pollinators. It is also this time when yellowjackets and wasps may come into more frequent contact with humans by swarming around trash cans, barbecues and even open soda cans looking for sweet things.


Generally speaking, paper wasps are shy of humans, far less defensive and much less prone to sting unless their nests are disturbed. Yellowjackets are more irritable and aggressive and seem to almost want to pick fights with humans. Like all wasps, both species can sting multiple times and although not common, anaphylactic reactions can occur. Studies have shown that some species that display brighter colors have larger venom glands and as a result are more venomous. It’s thought that the brighter color is a warning to keep predators away from the nest.


The Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District website states that it is dangerous to confront a yellowjacket nest and they offer free help with nest removal. They can be contacted here for more information.


-Kristie Ehrhardt (kehrhardt@tuleyome.org)

Tuleyome Land Conservation Program Manager


RECENT ARTICLES

June 5, 2025
We extend our thanks and gratitude to Stephen McCord as he ends his tenure on the Tuleyome Board of Directors. Stephen has applied his energy and expertise to fulfilling Tuleyome’s mission for many years. In 2016 he managed the first Tuleyome mercury mine remediation project at the Corona/Twin Peaks Mine. He followed that with work on Tuleyome trail projects in the Knoxville Off-Highway Vehicle Area, riding all the trails on his own adventure motorcycle. As a Tuleyome representative, he’s taken many community members on hikes in Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument and the surrounding areas. Stephen has over 20 years of environmental engineering experience, in California and worldwide. He has overseen extensive projects in water quality field work, management and cleanup, and has applied his knowledge to policy development, analysis and technical support. In short, Stephen is a consummate environmental and water engineer, and he brought his expertise to Tuleyome’s many projects. In 2023 Stephen joined the Board of Directors and agreed to serve as President. He applied his supreme organizational skills to managing board duties and activities. He also brought an optimism to the board about what can be accomplished with foresight, good planning and collaboration. Stephen has been a tireless advocate for Tuleyome, keeping the board on task even while handling numerous other professional responsibilities. Fortunately, although he is stepping down from the board, he will continue to support Tuleyome’s mission in many other ways. -Kim Longworth, Lyndsay Dawkins and Bill Grabert Volunteer Tuleyome Board members 
By Geoff Benn June 5, 2025
A river otter making its way up the slide. Looking to take a break with some cute video content? This month we placed game cameras looking into an otter slide at Conaway Ranch. Otter slides are paths worn into riverbanks by repeated use by otters and other animals. The slides at Conaway are quite active, so we’ve been able to get some great footage, including otters, beavers, racoons, snakes, and more! 
By Bryan Pride June 5, 2025
Since April 2024, America's public lands had something they'd never had before: a rule that treated conservation as equal to all other land uses. The Public Lands Rule , introduced by the Biden Administration, formally recognized conservation as a legitimate practice of multiple use, putting conservation on equal footing with recreation, grazing, and resource extraction. Built on decades of management experience and guided by science, data, and Indigenous knowledge, it gives land managers tools to maintain healthy ecosystems while supporting all the diverse ways we depend on public lands. It acknowledges a simple truth: conservation must be valued equally to all other land uses. Now there is growing pressure to rescind it. Why This Matters The environment around us is free-flowing, it's not confined to state borders or county lines. When mining operations contaminate watersheds in Northern California, it impacts the local businesses who depend on healthy rivers downstream, the agricultural communities that rely on clean water, and the families who've been camping along those waterways for generations. The Public Lands Rule recognized this interconnected reality and gave land managers agency to address problems before they spread across California's diverse landscapes, protecting the long-term viability of grazing allotments, recreation areas, and rural livelihoods that all depend on healthy public lands. This interconnected reality is exactly why the Public Lands Rule matters. The Rule is designed to ensure that the places we depend on, whether for weekend camping trips, or cattle grazing, stay healthy enough to support these uses long-term. When an area becomes overgrazed and doesn't recover, access to those grazing allotments is permanently lost, reducing ranchers' ability to maintain their livelihoods and harming local food production. Poor use or overuse of our public lands creates ripples of negative impact that hurt all communities. The Rule's main objective is simple but revolutionary: make sure our public lands stay productive for everyone who depends on them, rather than degrade them. The Rule created practical tools that built in accountability and prioritized future generations' access to healthy public lands. Restoration Leases : 10-year agreements allowing a variety of entities such as, conservation groups, tribes, and nonprofits to restore damaged landscapes—fires restoration, restoring wildlife habitats and cleaning up abandoned mining sites that currently scar some of our most beautiful public lands. Mitigation Leases : A tool that allows land users or other entities to offset impacts from their activities over specified time periods, creating partnerships between different land users and conservation groups to address environmental impacts on public lands. Strengthened Protection for Critical Areas : Clearer guidelines for protecting Areas of Critical Environmental Concern—the most special and fragile places that often provide the best wildlife viewing, the cleanest water sources, the most pristine camping experiences and the richest biodiversity. The False Dichotomy: Multiple Use vs. Conservation The main argument being used to encourage the rollback of the Public Lands Rule is " multiple use ", the legal principle requiring Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands to serve many different purposes. The current Administration claims the Public Lands Rule hinders multiple uses of public lands. Why? The Rule calls for restoring degraded areas and making science based decisions. Contrary to their actual meaning, the current Administration interprets "restoring" and "science based decisions" as "locking up land". Land locking, where access gets completely cut off, is a real concern in some areas—it prevents both recreation and grazing. However, land locking is not what the Public Lands Rule promotes. In reality, it is promoting land healing. Take grazing for example. The Rule empowers BLM to use restoration leases in conjunction with existing grazing permittees to restore degraded rangeland. Monitoring who is grazing where and the number of permits issued for specific areas is a means to ensure sustainable grazing and prevent overuse. Many ranchers and land managers supported the Rule because they understand that healthy land is productive land. Overgrazing and environmental damage hurt their livelihoods too. The same principle applies to fire recovery. When public lands are damaged by sweeping wildfires, there is a need for active restoration: replanting native vegetation, stabilizing soils, removing hazardous debris. Restoration has to take place before safe recreation, grazing and other uses can resume. At times, restoration requires temporarily limiting access to burned areas as they recover. The goal is to allow for our lands to recover and heal before we start depending on them again with our multiple uses. Land restoration is not just limited to grazing or extraction; it is essential for recovering from wildfires. Whether it's grazing, recreation, or extraction, the Public Lands Rule isn't about stopping these uses, it's about understanding that healthy ecosystems are prerequisites for multiple use, not obstacles to it. You can't have sustainable grazing on degraded rangeland, quality recreation in fire damaged landscapes, or responsible extraction without considering long-term impacts We Are Public Stewards The Public Lands Rule represents a historic shift in how we value conservation, its potential rollback is a setback. But the vision it represents, conservation as a form of legitimate multiple use, remains essential and is not gone. As stewards of these 245 million acres, we have the power to practice conservation in our own actions and advocacy. Every time we practice Leave No Trace, support local businesses that operate responsibly on public lands, and make our voices heard in land management decisions, we're building the foundation for balanced stewardship that benefits everyone. Our public lands belong to all of us, which means we each have the power, and responsibility, to be good stewards of the lands we love. -Bryan Pride ( bpride@tuleyome.org ) Certified California Naturalist Policy Director