Tuleyome's Science Corner: Serpentinite, Biodiversity, and Deep History

Amy Boyer • August 3, 2022

Serpentinite in Cedar Roughs Wilderness by Jim Rose

What does ancient seafloor have to do with plant diversity? Serpentinite, the California state rock, ties the two together.


If you’ve driven along the western shore of Lake Berryessa or along Highway 20 through the Coast Ranges, you’ve seen outcrops of blueish-green serpentinite, named for the scaly look of the rock. You may know it as serpentine. It started out as peridotite, part of the earth’s mantle, forming the basement of the seafloor; at some point water infiltrated it, changing its structure and giving it the sheet-like mineral structure that makes its scales. In the slow tectonic tumult that created California, bands of serpentinite traveled from the very bottom of the seafloor to the surface of the earth, in the Coast Ranges, the Klamath mountains, and the Sierra foothills.


Serpentinite is considered an “ultramafic” rock, very high in magnesium and iron. It fractures easily and weathers to a soil that, like its parent rock, is low in calcium and potassium, two important plant nutrients. The soil may also contain high amounts of chromium, cobalt, and nickel, which are toxic to plants in quantity. In summer the soil is hot and dry and inhospitable.


Yet plants grow in it, adapted not only to the drought and the lack of nutrients but also to the toxic metals. Serpentinite gives rise to over 10% of the endemic flora that make California a biological hotspot. Because few plants can tolerate serpentine soils, the plants that do are somewhat protected from competition and from invasive weeds (with barbed goatgrass, Aegilops triuncialis, being a notable, noxious exception). Over 200 California species are serpentine specialists that grow nowhere else, unable to compete on more fertile soils. Serpentine soils only cover about 1% of California’s area, so it is no surprise that some of these plants are rare, sensitive, or threatened.


California’s serpentinite and serpentine soils are important for science as well. Because serpentine areas are in a sense islands within other soils, they provide natural laboratories for studying evolution and the genetic drift that creates new species. An entire book edited by local professor Susan Harrison, one of the leading researchers on serpentine ecology, has been written on the fundamental insights that scientists have gained from serpentine areas, on topics that include microbial adaptation to harsh environments, plant-animal interactions, and ecosystem responses to climate change—among others.


Serpentinite forms the base of an ophiolite, a sequence of former seafloor rocks such as basaltic pillow lavas and chert that often occur together and reveal how the seafloor was formed. Ophiolites have been tremendously important in understanding plate tectonics and how the continents have moved. In “A Personal History of the Ophiolite Concept,” Eldridge Moores, renowned geologist and friend of Tuleyome, has written “Ophiolites were a major topic of discussion at the Penrose conference” he attended in 1969, where “geology was transformed” and plate tectonics became the leading theory for how continents form and move. Ophiolites also gave him the insight that the confusing geology of California could be explained by islands accreting against the North American continental plate.


The Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument is rich in serpentinite and ophiolitic outcrops. The proposed Molok Luyuk addition contains several areas of serpentine soils that are rich in rare and threatened plants, outcrops of serpentinite boulders, and other members of ophiolites. It is a great place to see and understand not only the uniqueness of California but also the mechanisms of evolution, the complexity of ecosystems, and the grandeur of geology.


-Amy Boyer

RECENT ARTICLES

June 5, 2025
We extend our thanks and gratitude to Stephen McCord as he ends his tenure on the Tuleyome Board of Directors. Stephen has applied his energy and expertise to fulfilling Tuleyome’s mission for many years. In 2016 he managed the first Tuleyome mercury mine remediation project at the Corona/Twin Peaks Mine. He followed that with work on Tuleyome trail projects in the Knoxville Off-Highway Vehicle Area, riding all the trails on his own adventure motorcycle. As a Tuleyome representative, he’s taken many community members on hikes in Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument and the surrounding areas. Stephen has over 20 years of environmental engineering experience, in California and worldwide. He has overseen extensive projects in water quality field work, management and cleanup, and has applied his knowledge to policy development, analysis and technical support. In short, Stephen is a consummate environmental and water engineer, and he brought his expertise to Tuleyome’s many projects. In 2023 Stephen joined the Board of Directors and agreed to serve as President. He applied his supreme organizational skills to managing board duties and activities. He also brought an optimism to the board about what can be accomplished with foresight, good planning and collaboration. Stephen has been a tireless advocate for Tuleyome, keeping the board on task even while handling numerous other professional responsibilities. Fortunately, although he is stepping down from the board, he will continue to support Tuleyome’s mission in many other ways. -Kim Longworth, Lyndsay Dawkins and Bill Grabert Volunteer Tuleyome Board members 
By Geoff Benn June 5, 2025
A river otter making its way up the slide. Looking to take a break with some cute video content? This month we placed game cameras looking into an otter slide at Conaway Ranch. Otter slides are paths worn into riverbanks by repeated use by otters and other animals. The slides at Conaway are quite active, so we’ve been able to get some great footage, including otters, beavers, racoons, snakes, and more! 
By Bryan Pride June 5, 2025
Since April 2024, America's public lands had something they'd never had before: a rule that treated conservation as equal to all other land uses. The Public Lands Rule , introduced by the Biden Administration, formally recognized conservation as a legitimate practice of multiple use, putting conservation on equal footing with recreation, grazing, and resource extraction. Built on decades of management experience and guided by science, data, and Indigenous knowledge, it gives land managers tools to maintain healthy ecosystems while supporting all the diverse ways we depend on public lands. It acknowledges a simple truth: conservation must be valued equally to all other land uses. Now there is growing pressure to rescind it. Why This Matters The environment around us is free-flowing, it's not confined to state borders or county lines. When mining operations contaminate watersheds in Northern California, it impacts the local businesses who depend on healthy rivers downstream, the agricultural communities that rely on clean water, and the families who've been camping along those waterways for generations. The Public Lands Rule recognized this interconnected reality and gave land managers agency to address problems before they spread across California's diverse landscapes, protecting the long-term viability of grazing allotments, recreation areas, and rural livelihoods that all depend on healthy public lands. This interconnected reality is exactly why the Public Lands Rule matters. The Rule is designed to ensure that the places we depend on, whether for weekend camping trips, or cattle grazing, stay healthy enough to support these uses long-term. When an area becomes overgrazed and doesn't recover, access to those grazing allotments is permanently lost, reducing ranchers' ability to maintain their livelihoods and harming local food production. Poor use or overuse of our public lands creates ripples of negative impact that hurt all communities. The Rule's main objective is simple but revolutionary: make sure our public lands stay productive for everyone who depends on them, rather than degrade them. The Rule created practical tools that built in accountability and prioritized future generations' access to healthy public lands. Restoration Leases : 10-year agreements allowing a variety of entities such as, conservation groups, tribes, and nonprofits to restore damaged landscapes—fires restoration, restoring wildlife habitats and cleaning up abandoned mining sites that currently scar some of our most beautiful public lands. Mitigation Leases : A tool that allows land users or other entities to offset impacts from their activities over specified time periods, creating partnerships between different land users and conservation groups to address environmental impacts on public lands. Strengthened Protection for Critical Areas : Clearer guidelines for protecting Areas of Critical Environmental Concern—the most special and fragile places that often provide the best wildlife viewing, the cleanest water sources, the most pristine camping experiences and the richest biodiversity. The False Dichotomy: Multiple Use vs. Conservation The main argument being used to encourage the rollback of the Public Lands Rule is " multiple use ", the legal principle requiring Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands to serve many different purposes. The current Administration claims the Public Lands Rule hinders multiple uses of public lands. Why? The Rule calls for restoring degraded areas and making science based decisions. Contrary to their actual meaning, the current Administration interprets "restoring" and "science based decisions" as "locking up land". Land locking, where access gets completely cut off, is a real concern in some areas—it prevents both recreation and grazing. However, land locking is not what the Public Lands Rule promotes. In reality, it is promoting land healing. Take grazing for example. The Rule empowers BLM to use restoration leases in conjunction with existing grazing permittees to restore degraded rangeland. Monitoring who is grazing where and the number of permits issued for specific areas is a means to ensure sustainable grazing and prevent overuse. Many ranchers and land managers supported the Rule because they understand that healthy land is productive land. Overgrazing and environmental damage hurt their livelihoods too. The same principle applies to fire recovery. When public lands are damaged by sweeping wildfires, there is a need for active restoration: replanting native vegetation, stabilizing soils, removing hazardous debris. Restoration has to take place before safe recreation, grazing and other uses can resume. At times, restoration requires temporarily limiting access to burned areas as they recover. The goal is to allow for our lands to recover and heal before we start depending on them again with our multiple uses. Land restoration is not just limited to grazing or extraction; it is essential for recovering from wildfires. Whether it's grazing, recreation, or extraction, the Public Lands Rule isn't about stopping these uses, it's about understanding that healthy ecosystems are prerequisites for multiple use, not obstacles to it. You can't have sustainable grazing on degraded rangeland, quality recreation in fire damaged landscapes, or responsible extraction without considering long-term impacts We Are Public Stewards The Public Lands Rule represents a historic shift in how we value conservation, its potential rollback is a setback. But the vision it represents, conservation as a form of legitimate multiple use, remains essential and is not gone. As stewards of these 245 million acres, we have the power to practice conservation in our own actions and advocacy. Every time we practice Leave No Trace, support local businesses that operate responsibly on public lands, and make our voices heard in land management decisions, we're building the foundation for balanced stewardship that benefits everyone. Our public lands belong to all of us, which means we each have the power, and responsibility, to be good stewards of the lands we love. -Bryan Pride ( bpride@tuleyome.org ) Certified California Naturalist Policy Director