Book Recommendation - Gertrude's Oaks

Nate Lillge • March 7, 2022

David Wilkinson's new book "Gertrude's Oaks: The History & Legacy of Woodland's Urban Forest" now available 


The young pioneer schoolteacher, Gertrude Swain Freeman, gave Woodland its name in 1861 when her husband founded the small town carved out of a valley oak grove. Gertrude loved the trees and rural surroundings, but to her dismay many of the native valley oaks disappeared during her lifetime, a trend that continued in the modern era. Gertrude’s Oaks is David Wilkinson’s new deeply researched book, the latest in a series he has penned about Woodland’s remarkable cultural history. This book traces Woodland’s relationship with its trees spanning three centuries.


The Woodland author brings to life this dynamic and colorful history while introducing readers to several notable historical figures in Woodland’s formative years whose pens forced the community to consider its destructive tendencies towards its oak tree heritage. Using genealogy and other primary research sources, Wilkinson delves into the lives of such notable writers as historians H. Wallace Atwell and Corydon P. Sprague (Western Shore Gazetteer, 1870), Franklin T. Gilbert (Depue’s Yolo County History and Atlas, 1879), and Edward Leake and son Paul Leake who published the Daily Democrat newspaper throughout much of the 20th century. 


Wilkinson explores the lives of other influential leaders involved in the early 20th century women’s club movement, such as Woodland writer Serelda Gilstrap Thomas, who were committed to Woodland’s civic and cultural development. The Women’s Improvement Club created Woodland’s first Arbor Day celebration in 1903 and were responsible for the development of City Park, Woodland’s first municipal park, opening in 1909. 


In addition to being cultural catalysts, women advocated for tree preservation. Over a century ago, Shakespeare Club women joined other groups in protesting the destruction of large Woodland trees located in city parks and advocated for a progressive tree preservation ordinance. Rich in historical context, Wilkinson writes about the progression of Woodland’s public policies to plant and protect its public trees and expand its urban forest and park system, including a watershed tree ordinance approved in 1940 which led to citizen oversight of public trees. Layered with literary history, Gertrude’s Oaks shows how imaginative poets kindled California’s first Arbor Day in 1886 in San Francisco, influencing other cities to do the same. California poets, whose verse deepens our perception about the essential worth of trees, are celebrated throughout the book.


In the modern era, Gertrude’s Oaks sheds light on renewed citizen activism in the 1990s which led to efforts to protect large oaks and other trees threatened by development while informing the public about their value. Wilkinson writes from first-hand experience how local citizens created the nonprofit Woodland Tree Foundation in 2000 in the wake of a lawsuit to save historical trees from a road-widening project. Under the leadership of the Foundation, volunteers have planted over 5,800 trees throughout Woodland and on the Highway 113 corridor.


On the policy side, the author explains the relevance of Woodland’s “Climate Action Plan” to the growth of its urban forest and how Woodland’s “Urban Forest Master Plan” will guide urban forestry in the future. Gertrude’s Oaks delves deeply into the significant environmental and historical value of Woodland’s native oaks and big trees. Valley oak trees, a long-lived keystone species which hosts abundant wildlife, are adaptable to warming climates and can sequester large quantities of CO2, a greenhouse gas. Wilkinson questions whether removing unprotected native oaks and large trees is morally justifiable in the modern era, faced as humanity is with the critical challenges of global warming. On a buoyant note Gertrude’s Oaks reveals how California communities, including Woodland plan to “re-oak” landscapes once rich with valley oaks where open space allows, including new developments.


The impassioned book contains over 200 archival and contemporary photographs spanning Woodland’s history, sourced from the Yolo County Archives and Yolo County History Museum collections and a variety of other sources. Talented Woodland photographers, Susan Bovey, David Rosen and Yvonne Hunter, contributed sparkling photos of the city’s beautiful and inspiring landscape. David Herbst, a local artefact collector, contributed rare historical photos. The Yolo County Historical Society (YCHS) and the Stroll Through History, Inc. underwrote the cost of publishing the book. Net book sale proceeds will benefit YCHS programs.


Gertrude’s Oaks is available at Local Inspirations, Haven Boutique and Remember When Emporium-all in Downtown Woodland- and at the Woodland Nugget Market. It is also available at Amazon.com. 


David will be signing books on Friday March 6 at 6 pm at Local Inspirations, 524 Main Street, Woodland.

RECENT ARTICLES

By Nate Lillge August 6, 2025
Bill Grabert is stepping down from his position as treasurer on Tuleyome’s volunteer Board of Directors – we thank him for his many years of service! Bill first joined Tuleyome as a staff member in 2016. His nature-based teaching influenced many youth over the years with school field trips throughout the Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument region, from Redbud Trail to Conaway Ranch. As part of Tuleyome’s team of instructors for the California Certified Naturalist program, Bill inspired adults to care for the region. His love of the area began as soon as he graduated from college and began working as a geologist in Lake County. Bill has devoted his diverse knowledge and skillset to care for, steward, and enjoy California’s northern Inner Coast Range Mountains for many years. He will be missed on the Board but we look forward to seeing him on the trails! -Nate Lillge (Adventures and Engagement Director)  and Lyndsay Dawkins (Volunteer Tuleyome Board President)
By Bryan Pride August 6, 2025
Fifty-eight and a half million acres of America's wildest forests have been protected for nearly 25 years by the Roadless Rule, a conservation cornerstone that could soon disappear. Established in 2001, the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (RACR) , more commonly known as the Roadless Rule, designated "Inventoried Roadless Areas" (IRAs) across our nation's forests, prohibiting new roads from being built. Now, USDA Secretary Rollins wants to rescind it . From Alaska to California, the losses from this rollback would be massive. In Alaska, 92% of the Tongass National Forest could lose protection, threatening one of the world's most pristine ecosystems and the indigenous communities who call it home. California would lose protections across 4.4 million acres spanning 21 national forests , which has the potential to impact treasured places like Inyo, Shasta-Trinity, and the Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument. Rule Born from Necessity, Not Ideology The Roadless Rule traces back to 1998, when U.S. Forest Service Chief Mike Dombeck saw the agency's vast road system as a major environmental and fiscal problem . To put this in perspective: the Forest Service maintains eight times more miles of road than the Interstate Highway System. The agency had too many roads to properly maintain for safety and environmental purposes, with poorly maintained roads contributing to erosion and other harms across national forests. The road maintenance backlog had ballooned to $8.4 billion while the agency received only 20% of the funding needed to maintain roads to environmental and safety standards. Dombeck proposed a moratorium on road construction in undeveloped forest areas across most of the National Forest System. The agency adopted an 18-month moratorium in February 1999 pending completion of an overall road management plan. Later that year, the agency undertook a rule making process to provide long-term administrative protection for roadless areas. The Forest Service conducted an extensive public involvement process that produced 1.7 million comments , with the majority favoring a strong national policy protecting roadless areas. The resulting Roadless Rule was not and is still not a blanket ban: it makes exceptions to allow access to non-federal land inholdings and pre-existing mineral leases, and allows logging to reduce fire risk, improve habitat or aid in the recovery of endangered species. What began as a fiscally prudent solution to an unwieldy road network became a cornerstone of forest conservation, one that Americans overwhelmingly supported then and continue to support today. The Administration's Claims vs. Reality According to USDA Secretary Rollins , the rule is “overly restrictive”, hinders fire prevention and responsible timber production, therefore the Rule poses “real harm to millions of acres of our national forests.” Rollins linked rescinding the Rule with Presidential Executive Order 14192, "Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation .” The reality is different. Rollins' claim ignores what's actually at stake. Roadless areas are essential ecosystems that provide clean air and water while keeping wilderness intact. They also serve as critical refuges for wildlife; 57% of America's most vulnerable species depend on roadless areas for habitat. For the 156 million Americans who visit national forests annually, these areas offer irreplaceable backcountry recreation experiences. Most strikingly, the administration's fire prevention argument is backwards. Scientific research reveals that 88% of wildfires are human-caused , and 95% of these fires start within half a mile of a road. Areas closest to roads experience 53% more fires than would occur by random chance. Less than 3% of wildfires start in wilderness areas more than a mile from roads. This research indicates that more roads through our forests are more likely to increase fires and would outweigh the effects of improving fire containment. While the administration claims roads improve fire response, fire management teams consistently identify inadequate resources and personnel shortages, not roads , as the primary barriers to effective wildfire management . Rather than building roads that increase fire risk, fire management experts advocate for investing in cultural and prescribed burns, fire mitigation and forest restoration, proven approaches that are underfunded but key to preventing future fires and reducing fire magnitude. What's Next? Rescinding the Roadless Rule will require a public comment period that has yet to be announced. This is when we can all share our views. Tuleyome will be following this issue closely and will be commenting. For more information on the Roadless Rule and how to participate in the public comment process or other advocacy opportunities, contact B ryan Pr ide .
By Kristie Ehrhardt August 6, 2025
The short answer is honestly, pretty much anywhere! Because the 344,476 acre Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument (the Monument) is located in the rural areas of Colusa, Glenn, Lake, Mendocino, Napa, Solano and Yolo counties you will have a great view of the dark night sky, free from urban light pollution from virtually anywhere within its boundaries! The Monument is an easy drive from not only the metropolitan Sacramento area but also from the San Francisco Bay Area as well as the North Bay communities making it an easy day trip. If you’re here especially for the Perseid meteor shower though it might be a very long day since best viewing happens between the hours of midnight and early morning. If you’re adventurous and up for an all-nighter, be certain to pack plenty of water and snacks and be sure to pull over only where it is safe and you’re not blocking a road, especially when it’s dark. Also always keep safety in mind and look out for wildlife as the Monument is home to black bears, mountain lions, coyotes, tule elk and bobcats that may be traveling through the area as well. If you’d like to stay a night (or several), there are multiple developed campgrounds to choose from inside the Monument boundaries. If you’re up camping, check out The Blue Oaks Campground, Indian Valley Campground, Hunting Creek Campground, Deer Valley Campground, Lower Nye Campground, West Crocket Campground or Kowalski Camping area just to name a few of the sites available for overnight stays. Before you go though, please do check with the United States Forest Service or the Bureau of Land Management websites for details on the particular camping area you’re interested in as well as current conditions, requirements and fire restrictions. The Monument also offers primitive camping in the three wilderness areas located within the Monument boundaries. Cache Creek Wilderness, Cedar Roughs Wilderness and Snow Mountain Wilderness present nearly unlimited opportunities for dispersed camping or backcountry camping (areas located outside of designated campgrounds). Although camping is allowed and encouraged, these areas have no amenities such as tables, toilets, available water or waste removal and require you to pack out all trash and waste. There are no motorized vehicles allowed within Wilderness areas and they provide places for deep solitude with nature. Camping in Wilderness areas or other dispersed camping areas require visitors to understand and follow the Leave No Trace principles of outdoor recreating as well as planning ahead and knowing the area and what to pack. That said, other than the trees potentially blocking some of the night sky, you’re sure to avoid urban light pollution and have an unobstructed view of the night sky from practically anywhere within the Monument! -Kristie Ehrhardt ( kehrhardt@tuleyome.org ) Tuleyome Land Conservation Program Manager