Book Recommendation - Gertrude's Oaks

Nate Lillge • March 7, 2022

David Wilkinson's new book "Gertrude's Oaks: The History & Legacy of Woodland's Urban Forest" now available 


The young pioneer schoolteacher, Gertrude Swain Freeman, gave Woodland its name in 1861 when her husband founded the small town carved out of a valley oak grove. Gertrude loved the trees and rural surroundings, but to her dismay many of the native valley oaks disappeared during her lifetime, a trend that continued in the modern era. Gertrude’s Oaks is David Wilkinson’s new deeply researched book, the latest in a series he has penned about Woodland’s remarkable cultural history. This book traces Woodland’s relationship with its trees spanning three centuries.


The Woodland author brings to life this dynamic and colorful history while introducing readers to several notable historical figures in Woodland’s formative years whose pens forced the community to consider its destructive tendencies towards its oak tree heritage. Using genealogy and other primary research sources, Wilkinson delves into the lives of such notable writers as historians H. Wallace Atwell and Corydon P. Sprague (Western Shore Gazetteer, 1870), Franklin T. Gilbert (Depue’s Yolo County History and Atlas, 1879), and Edward Leake and son Paul Leake who published the Daily Democrat newspaper throughout much of the 20th century. 


Wilkinson explores the lives of other influential leaders involved in the early 20th century women’s club movement, such as Woodland writer Serelda Gilstrap Thomas, who were committed to Woodland’s civic and cultural development. The Women’s Improvement Club created Woodland’s first Arbor Day celebration in 1903 and were responsible for the development of City Park, Woodland’s first municipal park, opening in 1909. 


In addition to being cultural catalysts, women advocated for tree preservation. Over a century ago, Shakespeare Club women joined other groups in protesting the destruction of large Woodland trees located in city parks and advocated for a progressive tree preservation ordinance. Rich in historical context, Wilkinson writes about the progression of Woodland’s public policies to plant and protect its public trees and expand its urban forest and park system, including a watershed tree ordinance approved in 1940 which led to citizen oversight of public trees. Layered with literary history, Gertrude’s Oaks shows how imaginative poets kindled California’s first Arbor Day in 1886 in San Francisco, influencing other cities to do the same. California poets, whose verse deepens our perception about the essential worth of trees, are celebrated throughout the book.


In the modern era, Gertrude’s Oaks sheds light on renewed citizen activism in the 1990s which led to efforts to protect large oaks and other trees threatened by development while informing the public about their value. Wilkinson writes from first-hand experience how local citizens created the nonprofit Woodland Tree Foundation in 2000 in the wake of a lawsuit to save historical trees from a road-widening project. Under the leadership of the Foundation, volunteers have planted over 5,800 trees throughout Woodland and on the Highway 113 corridor.


On the policy side, the author explains the relevance of Woodland’s “Climate Action Plan” to the growth of its urban forest and how Woodland’s “Urban Forest Master Plan” will guide urban forestry in the future. Gertrude’s Oaks delves deeply into the significant environmental and historical value of Woodland’s native oaks and big trees. Valley oak trees, a long-lived keystone species which hosts abundant wildlife, are adaptable to warming climates and can sequester large quantities of CO2, a greenhouse gas. Wilkinson questions whether removing unprotected native oaks and large trees is morally justifiable in the modern era, faced as humanity is with the critical challenges of global warming. On a buoyant note Gertrude’s Oaks reveals how California communities, including Woodland plan to “re-oak” landscapes once rich with valley oaks where open space allows, including new developments.


The impassioned book contains over 200 archival and contemporary photographs spanning Woodland’s history, sourced from the Yolo County Archives and Yolo County History Museum collections and a variety of other sources. Talented Woodland photographers, Susan Bovey, David Rosen and Yvonne Hunter, contributed sparkling photos of the city’s beautiful and inspiring landscape. David Herbst, a local artefact collector, contributed rare historical photos. The Yolo County Historical Society (YCHS) and the Stroll Through History, Inc. underwrote the cost of publishing the book. Net book sale proceeds will benefit YCHS programs.


Gertrude’s Oaks is available at Local Inspirations, Haven Boutique and Remember When Emporium-all in Downtown Woodland- and at the Woodland Nugget Market. It is also available at Amazon.com. 


David will be signing books on Friday March 6 at 6 pm at Local Inspirations, 524 Main Street, Woodland.

RECENT ARTICLES

June 5, 2025
We extend our thanks and gratitude to Stephen McCord as he ends his tenure on the Tuleyome Board of Directors. Stephen has applied his energy and expertise to fulfilling Tuleyome’s mission for many years. In 2016 he managed the first Tuleyome mercury mine remediation project at the Corona/Twin Peaks Mine. He followed that with work on Tuleyome trail projects in the Knoxville Off-Highway Vehicle Area, riding all the trails on his own adventure motorcycle. As a Tuleyome representative, he’s taken many community members on hikes in Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument and the surrounding areas. Stephen has over 20 years of environmental engineering experience, in California and worldwide. He has overseen extensive projects in water quality field work, management and cleanup, and has applied his knowledge to policy development, analysis and technical support. In short, Stephen is a consummate environmental and water engineer, and he brought his expertise to Tuleyome’s many projects. In 2023 Stephen joined the Board of Directors and agreed to serve as President. He applied his supreme organizational skills to managing board duties and activities. He also brought an optimism to the board about what can be accomplished with foresight, good planning and collaboration. Stephen has been a tireless advocate for Tuleyome, keeping the board on task even while handling numerous other professional responsibilities. Fortunately, although he is stepping down from the board, he will continue to support Tuleyome’s mission in many other ways. -Kim Longworth, Lyndsay Dawkins and Bill Grabert Volunteer Tuleyome Board members 
By Geoff Benn June 5, 2025
A river otter making its way up the slide. Looking to take a break with some cute video content? This month we placed game cameras looking into an otter slide at Conaway Ranch. Otter slides are paths worn into riverbanks by repeated use by otters and other animals. The slides at Conaway are quite active, so we’ve been able to get some great footage, including otters, beavers, racoons, snakes, and more! 
By Bryan Pride June 5, 2025
Since April 2024, America's public lands had something they'd never had before: a rule that treated conservation as equal to all other land uses. The Public Lands Rule , introduced by the Biden Administration, formally recognized conservation as a legitimate practice of multiple use, putting conservation on equal footing with recreation, grazing, and resource extraction. Built on decades of management experience and guided by science, data, and Indigenous knowledge, it gives land managers tools to maintain healthy ecosystems while supporting all the diverse ways we depend on public lands. It acknowledges a simple truth: conservation must be valued equally to all other land uses. Now there is growing pressure to rescind it. Why This Matters The environment around us is free-flowing, it's not confined to state borders or county lines. When mining operations contaminate watersheds in Northern California, it impacts the local businesses who depend on healthy rivers downstream, the agricultural communities that rely on clean water, and the families who've been camping along those waterways for generations. The Public Lands Rule recognized this interconnected reality and gave land managers agency to address problems before they spread across California's diverse landscapes, protecting the long-term viability of grazing allotments, recreation areas, and rural livelihoods that all depend on healthy public lands. This interconnected reality is exactly why the Public Lands Rule matters. The Rule is designed to ensure that the places we depend on, whether for weekend camping trips, or cattle grazing, stay healthy enough to support these uses long-term. When an area becomes overgrazed and doesn't recover, access to those grazing allotments is permanently lost, reducing ranchers' ability to maintain their livelihoods and harming local food production. Poor use or overuse of our public lands creates ripples of negative impact that hurt all communities. The Rule's main objective is simple but revolutionary: make sure our public lands stay productive for everyone who depends on them, rather than degrade them. The Rule created practical tools that built in accountability and prioritized future generations' access to healthy public lands. Restoration Leases : 10-year agreements allowing a variety of entities such as, conservation groups, tribes, and nonprofits to restore damaged landscapes—fires restoration, restoring wildlife habitats and cleaning up abandoned mining sites that currently scar some of our most beautiful public lands. Mitigation Leases : A tool that allows land users or other entities to offset impacts from their activities over specified time periods, creating partnerships between different land users and conservation groups to address environmental impacts on public lands. Strengthened Protection for Critical Areas : Clearer guidelines for protecting Areas of Critical Environmental Concern—the most special and fragile places that often provide the best wildlife viewing, the cleanest water sources, the most pristine camping experiences and the richest biodiversity. The False Dichotomy: Multiple Use vs. Conservation The main argument being used to encourage the rollback of the Public Lands Rule is " multiple use ", the legal principle requiring Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands to serve many different purposes. The current Administration claims the Public Lands Rule hinders multiple uses of public lands. Why? The Rule calls for restoring degraded areas and making science based decisions. Contrary to their actual meaning, the current Administration interprets "restoring" and "science based decisions" as "locking up land". Land locking, where access gets completely cut off, is a real concern in some areas—it prevents both recreation and grazing. However, land locking is not what the Public Lands Rule promotes. In reality, it is promoting land healing. Take grazing for example. The Rule empowers BLM to use restoration leases in conjunction with existing grazing permittees to restore degraded rangeland. Monitoring who is grazing where and the number of permits issued for specific areas is a means to ensure sustainable grazing and prevent overuse. Many ranchers and land managers supported the Rule because they understand that healthy land is productive land. Overgrazing and environmental damage hurt their livelihoods too. The same principle applies to fire recovery. When public lands are damaged by sweeping wildfires, there is a need for active restoration: replanting native vegetation, stabilizing soils, removing hazardous debris. Restoration has to take place before safe recreation, grazing and other uses can resume. At times, restoration requires temporarily limiting access to burned areas as they recover. The goal is to allow for our lands to recover and heal before we start depending on them again with our multiple uses. Land restoration is not just limited to grazing or extraction; it is essential for recovering from wildfires. Whether it's grazing, recreation, or extraction, the Public Lands Rule isn't about stopping these uses, it's about understanding that healthy ecosystems are prerequisites for multiple use, not obstacles to it. You can't have sustainable grazing on degraded rangeland, quality recreation in fire damaged landscapes, or responsible extraction without considering long-term impacts We Are Public Stewards The Public Lands Rule represents a historic shift in how we value conservation, its potential rollback is a setback. But the vision it represents, conservation as a form of legitimate multiple use, remains essential and is not gone. As stewards of these 245 million acres, we have the power to practice conservation in our own actions and advocacy. Every time we practice Leave No Trace, support local businesses that operate responsibly on public lands, and make our voices heard in land management decisions, we're building the foundation for balanced stewardship that benefits everyone. Our public lands belong to all of us, which means we each have the power, and responsibility, to be good stewards of the lands we love. -Bryan Pride ( bpride@tuleyome.org ) Certified California Naturalist Policy Director