Enjoying Outside - How Sunscreen Works

Kristie Erhardt • August 9, 2024

Photo: Holtenwellness.com

 

Ultraviolet (UV) light or radiation is a form of energy from the sun. On the electromagnetic scale, UV light has shorter wavelengths than visible light, which is why humans can’t see it, but longer wavelengths than X-rays. However, we can most definitely feel it; UV light is what causes sunburns, suntans and freckles, as well as more serious skin and eye diseases. Thankfully our atmosphere, primarily our ozone layer, filters out a lot of this radiation which is why reducing and minimizing impacts to air quality is so important. There are many types of ultraviolet light but the four most commonly known are: UVA, UVB, UBC and Near-ultraviolet. UVA has the longest wavelengths of the UV lights and is primarily associated with skin aging. It is not absorbed by the atmosphere at all and can penetrate deep into the middle layer (dermis) of the skin. UVB has shorter wavelengths than UVA and is associated with skin burning and affects mainly the outer layer (epidermis) of the skin. Much of the sun’s UVB is absorbed by the atmosphere. UVC has the shortest wavelength and is useful as a germicide. In nature it is completely absorbed by the atmosphere. Near-ultraviolet light is visible to insects, fish, some birds and some mammals. UVA and UVB have been proven to harm the DNA in skin cells leading to an increased risk of damage, premature aging and possibly even skin cancer. Exposure to UVA and UVB light can also cause eye damage such as cataracts and some cancers. However, some UV light is beneficial. Exposure to UVB is responsible for the formation of vitamin D and in some climates or locations that don’t have abundant sunlight, vitamin D may need to be supplemented. UVC is known to kill active microbes such as viruses and bacteria. Recent work has indicated that use as a germicide may make indoor air as pure as outdoor air which could greatly lessen the transmission of viruses in indoor settings such as schools and hospitals.     

 

Thankfully for those of us that like to spend extended time outdoors, modern science has gifted us with sunscreen that can help prevent sun damage while we play or work outside. Although there are different types of sunscreens and they work in different ways, their main objective is to prevent UVA and UVB radiation from reaching the surface of your skin. 

 

Physical sunscreens contain very finely ground minerals such as zinc oxide or titanium dioxide that physically sit on the surface of the skin and act as a shield to reflect the sun’s rays away from our skin. The minerals are what causes most mineral sunscreen, sometimes called sunblock, to be a dense consistency and look white on the skin. Physical sunblocks work extremely well and rarely cause irritation or allergic reactions (both zinc oxide and titanium dioxide are main ingredients in diaper rash creams) and it's these types of sunscreens that are considered reef safe or reef friendly because they aren’t leaving added chemicals in the ocean.

 

The ingredients in chemical sunscreens create a thin film on the skin that absorbs the ultraviolet radiation before it reaches the surface skin. These sunscreens are usually clear or rub in to be invisible which is more appealing to a lot of people but can cause stinging or irritation to the skin. These types of sunscreens usually contain about 20% of the active ingredient and the rest is emollients, stabilizers and fragrances which are responsible for the irritation for some people. Chemical sunscreens come in a variety of formulas from gels, creams, lotions and sprays.

 

Sun Protection Factor (SPF) is a way to measure how effective that sunscreen or block is. It is a measure of how much UV light gets to the surface of your skin. As it would seem, the higher the SPF number, the higher the protection factor. That doesn’t mean that you can stay out in the sun longer without reapplying though, it simply means that it’s filtering out more or less of the UV rays. An SPF of 30 allows about one-thirtieth (or 3.3%) of the UV to reach the surface of your skin which means that it filters about 96.7% of the UV light. Doctors and those in the skin care industry recommend a sunscreen with at least an SPF of 50 or greater.

 

Broad spectrum sunscreens provide protection from both UVA and UVB light. Many broad spectrum sunscreens are a combination of both physical and chemical blockers and are the most effective sunscreens. Sunscreen should be applied 15-30 minutes before going out in the sun and reapplied at least every two hours or more frequently after swimming, sweating or towel drying. Sport and water-resistant sunscreens should stay on wet skin and be effective for 40-80 minutes. All sunscreen should also be applied liberally; at least a teaspoon for the face and neck, another teaspoon for each arm and leg, another for the front and another for the back of the body. A good estimate is about a shot glass worth of sunscreen for your entire body. And don’t forget to do your ears, they take a beating sitting out there on their own. There are even specific sunscreens available for your hair and scalp.

 

In general, sunscreens are considered safe as long as you’re not allergic to any ingredients and it’s best to use sun protection daily, even on cloudy days. Water, sand and snow reflect sunlight and can result in a nasty and unexpected burn. For babies under six months of age, doctors recommend clothing and hats with SPF rather than sunscreens that can irritate their delicate skin.

 

So slather it on, front and back, top to bottom, and go enjoy the outside!

RECENT ARTICLES

By Bryan Pride May 9, 2025
Across the country wildfires are increasingly more catastrophic; growing larger, spreading faster and burning longer than before. Nationwide, the total acres burned rose dramatically from 2.7 million in 2023 to nearly 9 million in 2024 . California is averaging more than 7,500 wildfires annually . Not including the recent Los Angeles fires, six of the top ten most destructive fires, three of the five deadliest fires, and all of the state's nine largest fires have occurred since 2017. It is unsustainable for both California and the country to continue burning at this magnitude. This leaves us with the question: "What can be done to solve the wildfire problem?" In response to this growing crisis, lawmakers are taking action. Congress is advancing different versions of the Fix Our Forests Act ( FOFA ) in the Senate and House of Representatives. How these bills progress and the opportunities to amend, change or improve these bills are constrained by the different processes in the House and the Senate. The House of Representatives The House of Representatives version of FOFA, (H.R. 471) , was introduced by Representative Bruce Westerman (R-AR) in January 2025 with 43 bipartisan cosponsors, including several from California. With a stated goal to expedite forest management activities under NEPA. H.R. 471, it significantly reflects Executive Order 14225, "Immediate Expansion of American Timber Production" (March 1, 2025). While the legislation takes some important steps, there are also significant concerns regarding rollbacks of environmental protections and judicial review. FOFA , H.R. 471, establishes an interagency Fireshed Center overseen by the Department of the Interior and U.S. Forest Service comprised of 15 agencies, administrations, departments and bureaus to gather data, provide guidance and work with states and tribes. It sets up a process to designate “fireshed management areas” and expands projects exempt from full reviews from 3,000 – 10,000 acres. The bill heavily favors logging as a form of fire management, but also embraces prescribed burns and prioritizes reforestation and restoration projects. H.R. 471 grants numerous “categorical exclusions”, exempting areas and projects from review under the National Environmental Policy Act, Endangered Species Act and National Historic Preservation Act. H.R. 471 also fast-tracks environmental review and consultation. At the same time, the Administration is significantly gutting personnel and expertise through DOGE and its budget. H.R. 471 alters the judicial process. H.R. 471 limits when a court can grant injunctive relief. What is injunctive relief? That is the ability of the court to say: “Stop doing what you are doing.” Or slow it down, or change it, while we figure this out. It is common. Removing it is unusual. H.R. 471 limits the court’s ability to order corrective actions, limits plaintiff’s ability to sue, limits the court’s ability to require additional data from an agency and allows the challenged activities to go forward while under review. H.R. 471 also decreases the statute of limitations (the time that someone has to sue) from 6 years to 120 days. Much concern was expressed over the expansion of categorical exclusions, the change in judicial review procedures and timelines and fast-tracking of proposals. However, there was no opportunity to address any of these issues. When a bill is introduced in the House of Representatives, much like in the Senate, it is assigned to a committee with subject matter expertise. Committees study bills, hold hearings and gather testimony from experts. Committees hold mark-up sessions to debate and make changes to the bill through amendments. When a House of Representatives Committee passes a bill, it sends the bill to the House Rules Committee. The House Rules committee determines the form of the bill, which amendments will be allowed, how long folks will have to speak, or not, and when the bill moves. The House Rules Committee is run by the party in power, by the majority party. The Rules Committee is heavily tilted to favor the majority party, giving it full control over the floor of the House or Representatives. The Rules Committee has nine members of the majority party, Republicans, and 4 members of the minority party, Democrats. There is no comparable Committee in the Senate. No committee hearings or mark-ups were held on H.R. 471. Only three amendments and only one hour of debate were allowed. In the House of Representatives, a simple majority vote is necessary for bill passage. In January 2025, the H.R. 471 passed the House of Representatives on a vote of 279-141 without a hearing or mark-up and with scant debate. In the Senate Now, attention has turned to the Senate, where Senators Curtis (R-UT), Hickenlooper (D-CO), Sheehy (R-MT) and Padilla’s (D-CA) version of FOFA , S. 1462 , introduced in April, is making its way through the Senate process. The bill’s stated goal is to improve forest management on BLM and USFS lands. Similar to the House of Representatives, when a bill is introduced in the Senate, it is assigned to a committee for study, hearings, expert testimony, a mark-up session and amendments. In fact, the Senate Agriculture Committee has already begun reviewing the legislation, holding a legislative hearing on S. March 6 . The next step will be a mark-up in committee, where we can expect to see robust debate. If the Committee decides to move forward with the bill, it sends it to the full Senate. If a committee does not send the bill to the Senate, the bill dies in committee. Once a bill is released from committee, the Majority Leader of the Senate is responsible for deciding when to send the legislation for a vote. There is no Rules Committee. At this stage of floor consideration and debate is when there is the most significant difference in the legislative process between the House and the Senate. During floor consideration, a senator or group of senators can exercise their right to unlimited debate through a filibuster, which can keep legislation off the floor indefinitely. Once a debate is closed through cloture, the Senate can move to a final vote on the bill, which requires a simple majority of 51 votes. A bill on the Senate floor requires only 51 votes to pass after a debate has ended, but it takes 60 votes to cut off debate through a process called "cloture." If 60 Senators vote in favor of ending the debate, it will move to a final vote. Because of the razor thin margin in the Senate – 53 Rs, 45 Ds and 2 Independents – Republicans will need Democrats to vote with them to stop debate and advance FOFA to a vote. The requirement for broader consensus often means that legislation passed by the Senate has undergone more compromise. This provides an opportunity for the minority party to shape the bill that is not present in the House of Representatives. Thus, the Senate version of FOFA, S. 1462 , represents a significant improvement over the House version. It too sets up “fireshed management areas” and calls for fireshed assessments, albeit based on different criteria than the House version. A centerpiece of S. 1462 is the establishment of Wildfire Intelligence Center staffed by wildfire experts, technical leads, and indigenous leaders and governed by a Board of 16 agencies, administrations, departments and bureaus. The legislation removes historical barriers that previously prevented foresters, fire teams, and indigenous communities from implementing these preventative practices, allowing for more proactive management across all phases of wildfire prevention, response, and recovery. These centers create opportunities for multifaceted approaches throughout the entire fire management cycle, from prevention to rapid response to restoration. The Senate version also retains more authority for environmental reviews and judicial action. While the S. 1462 retains greater environmental review under NEPA and the National Historic Preservation Act, it also rolls back ESA reviews of land management plans and other environmental reviews depending on acreage. S. 1462 too limits injunctive relief, although not as significantly as the House version. S. 1462 leaves untouched other aspects of judicial review. The Senate version of FOFA has garnered bipartisan support from leaders of the Republican and Democratic parties, as well as from California Governor Gavin Newsom, California Natural Resources Secretary Wade Crowfoot, and CAL Fire Director and Fire Chief Joe Tyler. Next Steps for the Legislation If the Senate passes a version of FOFA that is different from the House version, which is highly likely, a conference committee will be formed with members from both the House and the Senate to reconcile the differences. After the conference committee reaches agreement on a bill, both chambers must vote again to approve the reconciled bill before it can go before the President to be signed into law. Tuleyome will continue to keep you updated on the Fix Our Forests Act s. We hope to see real-time action and solutions to improve the fire resilience of our communities and our forests and improve forest health and wildfire management. Co-Authored by Bryan Pride and Sandra Schubert
May 9, 2025
I first heard about Tuleyome when I saw an ad for its California Certified Naturalist Class. I was recently retired and looking for a way to meet others and learn more about our natural environment. I met so many motivated advocates and eager learners in the class, and some have become good friends. Tuleyome focuses on a part of California I didn't know well. After completing the course I began participating in Naturalist class field trips, K-12 school outings, events, and Silver Spur Ranch camera maintenance trips. I love to help with the Naturalist class because I know the difference it made in my life. I also like turning kids and adults on to our special corner of California and the work Tuleyome is doing to preserve it. I make small regular donations now as an extension of my support for the mission. Tuleyome’s focus on a part of Northern California that is often overlooked resonates with me. It has been championing the inland coastal range and watersheds for protection, education, and wise use for 20+ years. I also appreciate how Tuleyome works with divergent spheres of interest, inspiring collaboration instead of conflict. Those partnerships have paid off locally, with Yolo County park development and Putah and Cache Creek watershed education and volunteer events. That’s an amazing legacy!  I want Tuleyome to succeed in their mission and that means supporting stability in staff and organizational resources. I figure every little bit helps.
By Kristie Ehrhardt May 9, 2025
May 2, 2025 marked one glorious year of Federal protection for the newest addition to the Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument - Molok Luyuk! Just a year ago, President Biden used the Antiquities Act to expand the Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument to include the mountainous ridge that runs along the eastern edge of the monument. Protecting Molok Luyuk, formally known as Walker Ridge, means that crucial wildlife migration corridors are protected and that biodiversity is safeguarded. Preserving Molok Luyuk provides an essential link between the existing monument and other protected areas for Black Bears, Mountain Lions and Tule Elk. The Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation gave the name Molok Luyuk and renaming it means returning an indigenous name to the ridge. Molok Luyuk is Patwin for “Condor Ridge” and it is located in Patwin heartland. Preserving the ridge means preserving significant ceremonial sites for the Miwok, Pomo and Wappo people as well as protecting vital, historic Tribal trading routes. The entire monument and much of the surrounding area is all part of the Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation’s vast ancestral lands. Molok Luyuk is a geologically unique area that presents 60-100 million years of history all within less than 14,00 acres. Plate tectonics has given rise to extraordinary biodiversity and the area has been called “perhaps the most accessible location” to see the unique geology of the entire Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument. “A walk across Molok Luyuk is a walk through 100 million years of history.” Together with our conservation partners, Tuleyome invites you to help us celebrate this Momentous occasion by taking a trip to visit our favorite monument. The wildflowers are amazing! -Kristie Ehrhardt ( kehrhardt@tuleyome.org ) Tuleyome Land Conservation Program Manager