Monumental Questions - Tell me More About Cache Creek

Kristie Ehrhardt • May 11, 2022

Cache Creek flows past Valley Vista Regional Park as it enters Capay Valley

Cache Creek begins at Clear Lake and is the only outlet for the Lake. The Cache Creek watershed flows east through Lake, Colusa and Yolo Counties and eventually into a settling basin near Woodland where the sediments are allowed to settle out and the water is then released into the Yolo Bypass and eventually into the Sacramento River through a series of flood control channels.


Upper Cache Creek courses through a canyon vegetated mainly with chaparral and is generally inaccessible. There are a few tributaries that flow into Cache Creek but the two major tributaries are the North Fork and Bear Creek. The North Fork begins north of Clear Lake on the slopes of Goat Mountain in the Mendocino National Forest, through the Indian Valley Reservoir and into Cache Creek below Highway 20. Bear Creek flows through the wildflower hotspot of Bear Valley and joins Cache Creek in Colusa County, then progresses through Yolo County’s splendid Capay Valley.


The name “Cache Creek” comes from the then Canadian-owned Hudson Bay Company, which began exploring Northern California via the Siskiyou Trail between 1820 and 1830. In 1828 they began trapping along the Sacramento River and caching their furs and pelts along the river’s tributaries, including Cache Creek – and the name stuck.


A landslide that resulted from the 1906 San Francisco earthquake temporarily blocked Cache Creek north of the town of Rumsey. The blockage caused the creek level to drop drastically and, in some places, it went completely dry. Eventually the creek broke through the mud and caused severe flooding in Rumsey. A rock ledge, called the Grigsby Riffle, approximately a mile and a half downstream from Clear Lake restricts water flow and increases the chances of flooding for communities around the lake. In 1914, a dam was constructed on the main fork of Cache Creek a few miles downstream of Clear Lake. The dam, cleverly named Cache Creek Dam, was built to increase the lake’s capacity and to regulate the outflow but the narrow, shallow creek channel does not allow the water to flow as fast as the dam can release it. This causes the water in Clear Lake to rise rapidly after prolonged rain events and to decrease very slowly. If flows were increased by altering the creek channel, communities downstream in Yolo County would be subject to flooding. This has been a long-standing squabble between counties resulting in court decisions and ongoing negotiations. The Capay Diversion Dam was constructed approximately 50 miles downstream from the Cache Creek Dam to distribute water throughout Yolo County using a network of canals and water control structures. 


Beginning in the early 1800’s and for about the next 150 years, mercury (also called quicksilver) mining took place along Cache Creek and other waterways in California. Because there were no environmental regulations then, waste from mining activities made its way uncontrolled into Cache causing an increase in mercury in both the creek and eventually the Sacramento River. In 2004 the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) stated that the mercury level was continuing to rise in Cache Creek and that the source was nearly forty old mines along the drainage. Several partners including the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the Cache Creek Technical Advisory Committee, UC Davis, Tuleyome and others are working to monitor mercury levels and to organize and guide mine-remediation.


Although barriers exclude fall run chinook salmon and steelhead from migrating up Cache Creek, in years with very high flow conditions, some salmon may spawn in the lower regions of the creek. The portion of the creek above the Capay Dam provides one of the best native fisheries for pikeminnow, hitch California roach and Sacramento suckers on the west side of the Valley. Other species include large and smallmouth bass and catfish.


Tuleyome led the effort to have thirty-one miles of Cache Creek designated as a California Wild and Scenic River and the watershed includes the 27,245-acre Cache Creek Wilderness Area which is managed by the BLM. It is home to two herds of Tule Elk, Bald Eagles and many other species of plants and wildlife. Further downstream, the Cache Creek Conservancy has restored a 130-acre site known as the Cache Creek Nature Preserve. Cache Creek offers many recreational opportunities including whitewater rafting (spring and summer when water is released), kayaking, canoeing, tubing, hiking and camping and more.


-Kristie Ehrhardt; kehrhardt@tuleyome.org


Tuleyome Land Conservation Program Manager

RECENT ARTICLES

June 5, 2025
We extend our thanks and gratitude to Stephen McCord as he ends his tenure on the Tuleyome Board of Directors. Stephen has applied his energy and expertise to fulfilling Tuleyome’s mission for many years. In 2016 he managed the first Tuleyome mercury mine remediation project at the Corona/Twin Peaks Mine. He followed that with work on Tuleyome trail projects in the Knoxville Off-Highway Vehicle Area, riding all the trails on his own adventure motorcycle. As a Tuleyome representative, he’s taken many community members on hikes in Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument and the surrounding areas. Stephen has over 20 years of environmental engineering experience, in California and worldwide. He has overseen extensive projects in water quality field work, management and cleanup, and has applied his knowledge to policy development, analysis and technical support. In short, Stephen is a consummate environmental and water engineer, and he brought his expertise to Tuleyome’s many projects. In 2023 Stephen joined the Board of Directors and agreed to serve as President. He applied his supreme organizational skills to managing board duties and activities. He also brought an optimism to the board about what can be accomplished with foresight, good planning and collaboration. Stephen has been a tireless advocate for Tuleyome, keeping the board on task even while handling numerous other professional responsibilities. Fortunately, although he is stepping down from the board, he will continue to support Tuleyome’s mission in many other ways. -Kim Longworth, Lyndsay Dawkins and Bill Grabert Volunteer Tuleyome Board members 
By Geoff Benn June 5, 2025
A river otter making its way up the slide. Looking to take a break with some cute video content? This month we placed game cameras looking into an otter slide at Conaway Ranch. Otter slides are paths worn into riverbanks by repeated use by otters and other animals. The slides at Conaway are quite active, so we’ve been able to get some great footage, including otters, beavers, racoons, snakes, and more! 
By Bryan Pride June 5, 2025
Since April 2024, America's public lands had something they'd never had before: a rule that treated conservation as equal to all other land uses. The Public Lands Rule , introduced by the Biden Administration, formally recognized conservation as a legitimate practice of multiple use, putting conservation on equal footing with recreation, grazing, and resource extraction. Built on decades of management experience and guided by science, data, and Indigenous knowledge, it gives land managers tools to maintain healthy ecosystems while supporting all the diverse ways we depend on public lands. It acknowledges a simple truth: conservation must be valued equally to all other land uses. Now there is growing pressure to rescind it. Why This Matters The environment around us is free-flowing, it's not confined to state borders or county lines. When mining operations contaminate watersheds in Northern California, it impacts the local businesses who depend on healthy rivers downstream, the agricultural communities that rely on clean water, and the families who've been camping along those waterways for generations. The Public Lands Rule recognized this interconnected reality and gave land managers agency to address problems before they spread across California's diverse landscapes, protecting the long-term viability of grazing allotments, recreation areas, and rural livelihoods that all depend on healthy public lands. This interconnected reality is exactly why the Public Lands Rule matters. The Rule is designed to ensure that the places we depend on, whether for weekend camping trips, or cattle grazing, stay healthy enough to support these uses long-term. When an area becomes overgrazed and doesn't recover, access to those grazing allotments is permanently lost, reducing ranchers' ability to maintain their livelihoods and harming local food production. Poor use or overuse of our public lands creates ripples of negative impact that hurt all communities. The Rule's main objective is simple but revolutionary: make sure our public lands stay productive for everyone who depends on them, rather than degrade them. The Rule created practical tools that built in accountability and prioritized future generations' access to healthy public lands. Restoration Leases : 10-year agreements allowing a variety of entities such as, conservation groups, tribes, and nonprofits to restore damaged landscapes—fires restoration, restoring wildlife habitats and cleaning up abandoned mining sites that currently scar some of our most beautiful public lands. Mitigation Leases : A tool that allows land users or other entities to offset impacts from their activities over specified time periods, creating partnerships between different land users and conservation groups to address environmental impacts on public lands. Strengthened Protection for Critical Areas : Clearer guidelines for protecting Areas of Critical Environmental Concern—the most special and fragile places that often provide the best wildlife viewing, the cleanest water sources, the most pristine camping experiences and the richest biodiversity. The False Dichotomy: Multiple Use vs. Conservation The main argument being used to encourage the rollback of the Public Lands Rule is " multiple use ", the legal principle requiring Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands to serve many different purposes. The current Administration claims the Public Lands Rule hinders multiple uses of public lands. Why? The Rule calls for restoring degraded areas and making science based decisions. Contrary to their actual meaning, the current Administration interprets "restoring" and "science based decisions" as "locking up land". Land locking, where access gets completely cut off, is a real concern in some areas—it prevents both recreation and grazing. However, land locking is not what the Public Lands Rule promotes. In reality, it is promoting land healing. Take grazing for example. The Rule empowers BLM to use restoration leases in conjunction with existing grazing permittees to restore degraded rangeland. Monitoring who is grazing where and the number of permits issued for specific areas is a means to ensure sustainable grazing and prevent overuse. Many ranchers and land managers supported the Rule because they understand that healthy land is productive land. Overgrazing and environmental damage hurt their livelihoods too. The same principle applies to fire recovery. When public lands are damaged by sweeping wildfires, there is a need for active restoration: replanting native vegetation, stabilizing soils, removing hazardous debris. Restoration has to take place before safe recreation, grazing and other uses can resume. At times, restoration requires temporarily limiting access to burned areas as they recover. The goal is to allow for our lands to recover and heal before we start depending on them again with our multiple uses. Land restoration is not just limited to grazing or extraction; it is essential for recovering from wildfires. Whether it's grazing, recreation, or extraction, the Public Lands Rule isn't about stopping these uses, it's about understanding that healthy ecosystems are prerequisites for multiple use, not obstacles to it. You can't have sustainable grazing on degraded rangeland, quality recreation in fire damaged landscapes, or responsible extraction without considering long-term impacts We Are Public Stewards The Public Lands Rule represents a historic shift in how we value conservation, its potential rollback is a setback. But the vision it represents, conservation as a form of legitimate multiple use, remains essential and is not gone. As stewards of these 245 million acres, we have the power to practice conservation in our own actions and advocacy. Every time we practice Leave No Trace, support local businesses that operate responsibly on public lands, and make our voices heard in land management decisions, we're building the foundation for balanced stewardship that benefits everyone. Our public lands belong to all of us, which means we each have the power, and responsibility, to be good stewards of the lands we love. -Bryan Pride ( bpride@tuleyome.org ) Certified California Naturalist Policy Director