Monumental Questions - What is the Significance of the California Condor to Native Californians

Kristie Ehrhardt • June 14, 2024

Recently Tuleyome shared the Monumental news that Molok Luyuk, or Condor Ridge, was added to the boundaries of the Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument. This culturally and biologically significant addition was historically California Condor habitat.

 

Most of us are probably familiar with the life history of the California Condor (Gymnogyps californianus). Specifically how they once soared over much of North America witnessing the end of the wooly mammoths, mastodons, saber tooth tigers and giant sloths. They coexisted with America’s first people, saw the arrival of the Spanish and the British and later experienced the Gold Rush era and the havoc that came with it. By the 1900’s the population was in drastic decline and by the late 1940’s, California Condors were already rare. In 1982, only 22 California Condors survived worldwide and by 1987, they were extinct in the wild with the carefully deliberated capture of the remaining surviving 22 birds to begin a captive breeding program. By 2004 the total population (captive and free flying) numbered in the 500’s. Today the population remains roughly the same and has not declined. Since the beginning of the captive breeding program, California Condors have been reintroduced into the mountains of Arizona, Utah, Baja California and central and southern California. Part of the reason for the slow population growth is that California Condors do not reach sexual maturity until six years of age but may not breed until they are seven or eight years old and lay only one egg every other year. On top of their perhaps unfortunate biology, the use of dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT) resulted in dramatically thinner egg shells in many species of birds causing them to break while being incubated by the parents and kill the developing baby bird. And in addition to all of these concerns, California Condors were extraneous victims of lead poisoning and trophy hunting. 


Native Californians were enthralled with the California Condor’s impressive size and appearance. California Condors are the largest flying bird in North America with a wing span of nearly ten feet (that’s the distance of the rim of an NBA basketball hoop to the floor). Full grown adults can weigh up to 30 pounds and if not subject to lead poisoning and Avian Flu can live for roughly 50 to 60 years in captivity. 


Throughout California and the Pacific Northwest, researchers have found evidence that the California Condor helped form Native American’s mein of worship, spiritual beliefs, ceremonies, songs, dances and legends. In Oregon, the remains of over 60 birds were found at a site called Fivemile Rapids near what is currently called The Dalles. Some of the birds’ remains were intact while others appeared to have been used for other purposes including feather plucking. In the Bay and Delta regions of California, archeological sites have yielded a substantial amount of California Condor bones. Some of the wing bones were delicately engraved and made into flutes and other remains were found with human burials. Another location near Berkeley revealed what appeared to be a ritual condor burial site and still another site near Sacramento contained the remains of a cape made from California Condor skin and feathers.


There are at least 65 different known tribal names for the California Condor. Cultural significance is found in not only tangible discoveries such as capes and skirts made of skin and feathers, headdresses made of condor and Golden Eagles feathers, bone flutes, and cave art but the California Condor has also been immortalized in oral legends passed down from generation to generation. The condor had many roles including sorcerer, messenger, kidnapper, robber, gambler and killer. The Chumash have a story in which they believed that the condor was an all white bird but when it saw fire for the first time it was curious and flew too close to the flames singing all of its feathers except for the white under its wings where it didn’t touch the fire. Another tribe believed that the condor was an all black bird but their sky god shot light into the condor and it exited through its wings and that’s why part of the underwing remains white. Another tribe believed that condors removed foulness from the Earth which is scientifically true since they are obligate scavengers and help get rid of carrion. The Pima believe that condors created thunder and flashed lightning from their red eyes. 


The California Condor has a cultural celestial presence as well. The constellation we call Cassiopia is called Condor by the Chumash. Many Native Americans believe that Condor held up the upper world with its wing and is responsible for solar and lunar eclipses. 


It was believed that condors could infuse humans with supernatural powers. Central Miwok shaman believed that they could acquire powers that would allow them to become finders of lost objects, read minds, heal the sick and obtain anything they wanted. Money finders of the Yukuts and Western Mono tribes wore full length coats made of condor feathers and could find misplaced valuables. The Condor shaman of the Chumash tribe was believed to be able to locate missing people using the supernatural powers given to him by Condor. There are many other stories about the condor’s ability to heal the sick just by flying over them. They also believed that they could pull sickness from an individual by putting primary and secondary (the big ones) wing feathers down a sick individual’s throat and pulling out the illness with the feather.


The California Condor is the most powerful bird in Native American culture but there are few relics remaining today. This is partly because they believed that when a chief or shaman died, their condor feathers went with them. It’s been said that the Gold Rush was the genesis of the California Condors’ near extinction. They were shot for sport and captured for curiosity. Many died miserable deaths either starving in captivity or becoming a victim of lead poisoning as a result of eating discarded carcasses shot with lead shot. They were harvested and killed for their flight feathers as the quills were used to store gold dust. Sadly, California Condors escaped extinction only to later face man.


The Yurok tribe, the National Park Service and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service have partnered to form the Northern California Condor Restoration Program in a collaborative effort to reintroduce captive-bred condors to Yurok Ancestral Territory and the Pacific Northwest. To date, eight birds have been released and are flourishing in their new home. John W. Foster, a retired senior California archeologist wrote, “It is apparent that California Condors held a special place in the lives and ceremonies of California natives. It was a revered creature, a master of the spirit, who gave power to humans for a variety of world renewal and cosmic purposes. It is associated with death and mourning as well as rebirth and renewal.” Hopefully one day soon we will see California Condors again soaring over Molok Luyuk.


-Kristie Ehrhardt (kehrhardt@tuleyome.org)

Tuleyome Land Conservation Program Manager

RECENT ARTICLES

By Bryan Pride May 9, 2025
Across the country wildfires are increasingly more catastrophic; growing larger, spreading faster and burning longer than before. Nationwide, the total acres burned rose dramatically from 2.7 million in 2023 to nearly 9 million in 2024 . California is averaging more than 7,500 wildfires annually . Not including the recent Los Angeles fires, six of the top ten most destructive fires, three of the five deadliest fires, and all of the state's nine largest fires have occurred since 2017. It is unsustainable for both California and the country to continue burning at this magnitude. This leaves us with the question: "What can be done to solve the wildfire problem?" In response to this growing crisis, lawmakers are taking action. Congress is advancing different versions of the Fix Our Forests Act ( FOFA ) in the Senate and House of Representatives. How these bills progress and the opportunities to amend, change or improve these bills are constrained by the different processes in the House and the Senate. The House of Representatives The House of Representatives version of FOFA, (H.R. 471) , was introduced by Representative Bruce Westerman (R-AR) in January 2025 with 43 bipartisan cosponsors, including several from California. With a stated goal to expedite forest management activities under NEPA. H.R. 471, it significantly reflects Executive Order 14225, "Immediate Expansion of American Timber Production" (March 1, 2025). While the legislation takes some important steps, there are also significant concerns regarding rollbacks of environmental protections and judicial review. FOFA , H.R. 471, establishes an interagency Fireshed Center overseen by the Department of the Interior and U.S. Forest Service comprised of 15 agencies, administrations, departments and bureaus to gather data, provide guidance and work with states and tribes. It sets up a process to designate “fireshed management areas” and expands projects exempt from full reviews from 3,000 – 10,000 acres. The bill heavily favors logging as a form of fire management, but also embraces prescribed burns and prioritizes reforestation and restoration projects. H.R. 471 grants numerous “categorical exclusions”, exempting areas and projects from review under the National Environmental Policy Act, Endangered Species Act and National Historic Preservation Act. H.R. 471 also fast-tracks environmental review and consultation. At the same time, the Administration is significantly gutting personnel and expertise through DOGE and its budget. H.R. 471 alters the judicial process. H.R. 471 limits when a court can grant injunctive relief. What is injunctive relief? That is the ability of the court to say: “Stop doing what you are doing.” Or slow it down, or change it, while we figure this out. It is common. Removing it is unusual. H.R. 471 limits the court’s ability to order corrective actions, limits plaintiff’s ability to sue, limits the court’s ability to require additional data from an agency and allows the challenged activities to go forward while under review. H.R. 471 also decreases the statute of limitations (the time that someone has to sue) from 6 years to 120 days. Much concern was expressed over the expansion of categorical exclusions, the change in judicial review procedures and timelines and fast-tracking of proposals. However, there was no opportunity to address any of these issues. When a bill is introduced in the House of Representatives, much like in the Senate, it is assigned to a committee with subject matter expertise. Committees study bills, hold hearings and gather testimony from experts. Committees hold mark-up sessions to debate and make changes to the bill through amendments. When a House of Representatives Committee passes a bill, it sends the bill to the House Rules Committee. The House Rules committee determines the form of the bill, which amendments will be allowed, how long folks will have to speak, or not, and when the bill moves. The House Rules Committee is run by the party in power, by the majority party. The Rules Committee is heavily tilted to favor the majority party, giving it full control over the floor of the House or Representatives. The Rules Committee has nine members of the majority party, Republicans, and 4 members of the minority party, Democrats. There is no comparable Committee in the Senate. No committee hearings or mark-ups were held on H.R. 471. Only three amendments and only one hour of debate were allowed. In the House of Representatives, a simple majority vote is necessary for bill passage. In January 2025, the H.R. 471 passed the House of Representatives on a vote of 279-141 without a hearing or mark-up and with scant debate. In the Senate Now, attention has turned to the Senate, where Senators Curtis (R-UT), Hickenlooper (D-CO), Sheehy (R-MT) and Padilla’s (D-CA) version of FOFA , S. 1462 , introduced in April, is making its way through the Senate process. The bill’s stated goal is to improve forest management on BLM and USFS lands. Similar to the House of Representatives, when a bill is introduced in the Senate, it is assigned to a committee for study, hearings, expert testimony, a mark-up session and amendments. In fact, the Senate Agriculture Committee has already begun reviewing the legislation, holding a legislative hearing on S. March 6 . The next step will be a mark-up in committee, where we can expect to see robust debate. If the Committee decides to move forward with the bill, it sends it to the full Senate. If a committee does not send the bill to the Senate, the bill dies in committee. Once a bill is released from committee, the Majority Leader of the Senate is responsible for deciding when to send the legislation for a vote. There is no Rules Committee. At this stage of floor consideration and debate is when there is the most significant difference in the legislative process between the House and the Senate. During floor consideration, a senator or group of senators can exercise their right to unlimited debate through a filibuster, which can keep legislation off the floor indefinitely. Once a debate is closed through cloture, the Senate can move to a final vote on the bill, which requires a simple majority of 51 votes. A bill on the Senate floor requires only 51 votes to pass after a debate has ended, but it takes 60 votes to cut off debate through a process called "cloture." If 60 Senators vote in favor of ending the debate, it will move to a final vote. Because of the razor thin margin in the Senate – 53 Rs, 45 Ds and 2 Independents – Republicans will need Democrats to vote with them to stop debate and advance FOFA to a vote. The requirement for broader consensus often means that legislation passed by the Senate has undergone more compromise. This provides an opportunity for the minority party to shape the bill that is not present in the House of Representatives. Thus, the Senate version of FOFA, S. 1462 , represents a significant improvement over the House version. It too sets up “fireshed management areas” and calls for fireshed assessments, albeit based on different criteria than the House version. A centerpiece of S. 1462 is the establishment of Wildfire Intelligence Center staffed by wildfire experts, technical leads, and indigenous leaders and governed by a Board of 16 agencies, administrations, departments and bureaus. The legislation removes historical barriers that previously prevented foresters, fire teams, and indigenous communities from implementing these preventative practices, allowing for more proactive management across all phases of wildfire prevention, response, and recovery. These centers create opportunities for multifaceted approaches throughout the entire fire management cycle, from prevention to rapid response to restoration. The Senate version also retains more authority for environmental reviews and judicial action. While the S. 1462 retains greater environmental review under NEPA and the National Historic Preservation Act, it also rolls back ESA reviews of land management plans and other environmental reviews depending on acreage. S. 1462 too limits injunctive relief, although not as significantly as the House version. S. 1462 leaves untouched other aspects of judicial review. The Senate version of FOFA has garnered bipartisan support from leaders of the Republican and Democratic parties, as well as from California Governor Gavin Newsom, California Natural Resources Secretary Wade Crowfoot, and CAL Fire Director and Fire Chief Joe Tyler. Next Steps for the Legislation If the Senate passes a version of FOFA that is different from the House version, which is highly likely, a conference committee will be formed with members from both the House and the Senate to reconcile the differences. After the conference committee reaches agreement on a bill, both chambers must vote again to approve the reconciled bill before it can go before the President to be signed into law. Tuleyome will continue to keep you updated on the Fix Our Forests Act s. We hope to see real-time action and solutions to improve the fire resilience of our communities and our forests and improve forest health and wildfire management. Co-Authored by Bryan Pride and Sandra Schubert
May 9, 2025
I first heard about Tuleyome when I saw an ad for its California Certified Naturalist Class. I was recently retired and looking for a way to meet others and learn more about our natural environment. I met so many motivated advocates and eager learners in the class, and some have become good friends. Tuleyome focuses on a part of California I didn't know well. After completing the course I began participating in Naturalist class field trips, K-12 school outings, events, and Silver Spur Ranch camera maintenance trips. I love to help with the Naturalist class because I know the difference it made in my life. I also like turning kids and adults on to our special corner of California and the work Tuleyome is doing to preserve it. I make small regular donations now as an extension of my support for the mission. Tuleyome’s focus on a part of Northern California that is often overlooked resonates with me. It has been championing the inland coastal range and watersheds for protection, education, and wise use for 20+ years. I also appreciate how Tuleyome works with divergent spheres of interest, inspiring collaboration instead of conflict. Those partnerships have paid off locally, with Yolo County park development and Putah and Cache Creek watershed education and volunteer events. That’s an amazing legacy!  I want Tuleyome to succeed in their mission and that means supporting stability in staff and organizational resources. I figure every little bit helps.
By Kristie Ehrhardt May 9, 2025
May 2, 2025 marked one glorious year of Federal protection for the newest addition to the Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument - Molok Luyuk! Just a year ago, President Biden used the Antiquities Act to expand the Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument to include the mountainous ridge that runs along the eastern edge of the monument. Protecting Molok Luyuk, formally known as Walker Ridge, means that crucial wildlife migration corridors are protected and that biodiversity is safeguarded. Preserving Molok Luyuk provides an essential link between the existing monument and other protected areas for Black Bears, Mountain Lions and Tule Elk. The Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation gave the name Molok Luyuk and renaming it means returning an indigenous name to the ridge. Molok Luyuk is Patwin for “Condor Ridge” and it is located in Patwin heartland. Preserving the ridge means preserving significant ceremonial sites for the Miwok, Pomo and Wappo people as well as protecting vital, historic Tribal trading routes. The entire monument and much of the surrounding area is all part of the Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation’s vast ancestral lands. Molok Luyuk is a geologically unique area that presents 60-100 million years of history all within less than 14,00 acres. Plate tectonics has given rise to extraordinary biodiversity and the area has been called “perhaps the most accessible location” to see the unique geology of the entire Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument. “A walk across Molok Luyuk is a walk through 100 million years of history.” Together with our conservation partners, Tuleyome invites you to help us celebrate this Momentous occasion by taking a trip to visit our favorite monument. The wildflowers are amazing! -Kristie Ehrhardt ( kehrhardt@tuleyome.org ) Tuleyome Land Conservation Program Manager