Policy Corner: Wildfire: A Crisis In Need of a Bipartisan Solution

Across the country wildfires are increasingly more catastrophic; growing larger, spreading faster and burning longer than before. Nationwide, the total acres burned rose dramatically from 2.7 million in 2023 to nearly 9 million in 2024. California is averaging more than 7,500 wildfires annually. Not including the recent Los Angeles fires, six of the top ten most destructive fires, three of the five deadliest fires, and all of the state's nine largest fires have occurred since 2017.

It is unsustainable for both California and the country to continue burning at this magnitude. This leaves us with the question: "What can be done to solve the wildfire problem?"

In response to this growing crisis, lawmakers are taking action. Congress is advancing different versions of the Fix Our Forests Act (FOFA) in the Senate and House of Representatives. How these bills progress and the opportunities to amend, change or improve these bills are constrained by the different processes in the House and the Senate.

The House of Representatives

The House of Representatives version of FOFA, (H.R. 471), was introduced by Representative Bruce Westerman (R-AR) in January 2025 with 43 bipartisan cosponsors, including several from California. With a stated goal to expedite forest management activities under NEPA. H.R. 471, it significantly reflectsExecutive Order 14225, "Immediate Expansion of American Timber Production" (March 1, 2025). While the legislation takes some important steps, there are also significant concerns regarding rollbacks of environmental protections and judicial review.

FOFA, H.R. 471, establishes an interagency Fireshed Center overseen by the Department of the Interior and U.S. Forest Service comprised of 15 agencies, administrations, departments and bureaus to gather data, provide guidance and work with states and tribes. It sets up a process to designate “fireshed management areas” and expands projects exempt from full reviews from 3,000 – 10,000 acres. The bill heavily favors logging as a form of fire management, but also embraces prescribed burns and prioritizes reforestation and restoration projects.

H.R. 471 grants numerous “categorical exclusions”, exempting areas and projects from review under the National Environmental Policy Act, Endangered Species Act and National Historic Preservation Act. H.R. 471 also fast-tracks environmental review and consultation. At the same time, the Administration is significantly gutting personnel and expertise through DOGE and its budget.

H.R. 471 alters the judicial process. H.R. 471 limits when a court can grant injunctive relief. What is injunctive relief? That is the ability of the court to say: “Stop doing what you are doing.” Or slow it down, or change it, while we figure this out. It is common. Removing it is unusual. H.R. 471 limits the court’s ability to order corrective actions, limits plaintiff’s ability to sue, limits the court’s ability to require additional data from an agency and allows the challenged activities to go forward while under review. H.R. 471 also decreases the statute of limitations (the time that someone has to sue) from 6 years to 120 days.

Much concern was expressed over the expansion of categorical exclusions, the change in judicial review procedures and timelines and fast-tracking of proposals. However, there was no opportunity to address any of these issues.

When a bill is introduced in the House of Representatives, much like in the Senate, it is assigned to a committee with subject matter expertise. Committees study bills, hold hearings and gather testimony from experts. Committees hold mark-up sessions to debate and make changes to the bill through amendments. When a House of Representatives Committee passes a bill, it sends the bill to the House Rules Committee.

The House Rules committee determines the form of the bill, which amendments will be allowed, how long folks will have to speak, or not, and when the bill moves. The House Rules Committee is run by the party in power, by the majority party. The Rules Committee is heavily tilted to favor the majority party, giving it full control over the floor of the House or Representatives. The Rules Committee has nine members of the majority party, Republicans, and 4 members of the minority party, Democrats. There is no comparable Committee in the Senate.

No committee hearings or mark-ups were held on H.R. 471. Only three amendments and only one hour of debate were allowed. In the House of Representatives, a simple majority vote is necessary for bill passage. In January 2025, the H.R. 471 passed the House of Representatives on a vote of 279-141 without a hearing or mark-up and with scant debate.

In the Senate

Now, attention has turned to the Senate, where Senators Curtis (R-UT), Hickenlooper (D-CO), Sheehy (R-MT) and Padilla’s (D-CA) version of FOFA, S. 1462, introduced in April, is making its way through the Senate process. The bill’s stated goal is to improve forest management on BLM and USFS lands.

Similar to the House of Representatives, when a bill is introduced in the Senate, it is assigned to a committee for study, hearings, expert testimony, a mark-up session and amendments. In fact, the Senate Agriculture Committeehas already begun reviewing the legislation, holding a legislative hearing on S. March 6. The next step will be a mark-up in committee, where we can expect to see robust debate.

If the Committee decides to move forward with the bill, it sends it to the full Senate. If a committee does not send the bill to the Senate, the bill dies in committee. Once a bill is released from committee, the Majority Leader of the Senate is responsible for deciding when to send the legislation for a vote. There is no Rules Committee. At this stage of floor consideration and debate is when there is the most significant difference in the legislative process between the House and the Senate. During floor consideration, a senator or group of senators can exercise their right to unlimited debate through a filibuster, which can keep legislation off the floor indefinitely. Once a debate is closed through cloture, the Senate can move to a final vote on the bill, which requires a simple majority of 51 votes.

A bill on the Senate floor requires only 51 votes to pass after a debate has ended, but it takes 60 votes to cut off debate through a process called "cloture." If 60 Senators vote in favor of ending the debate, it will move to a final vote. Because of the razor thin margin in the Senate – 53 Rs, 45 Ds and 2 Independents – Republicans will need Democrats to vote with them to stop debate and advance FOFA to a vote. The requirement for broader consensus often means that legislation passed by the Senate has undergone more compromise. This provides an opportunity for the minority party to shape the bill that is not present in the House of Representatives.

Thus, the Senate version of FOFA, S. 1462, represents a significant improvement over the House version. It too sets up “fireshed management areas” and calls for fireshed assessments, albeit based on different criteria than the House version. A centerpiece of S. 1462 is the establishment of Wildfire Intelligence Center staffed by wildfire experts, technical leads, and indigenous leaders and governed by a Board of 16 agencies, administrations, departments and bureaus. The legislation removes historical barriers that previously prevented foresters, fire teams, and indigenous communities from implementing these preventative practices, allowing for more proactive management across all phases of wildfire prevention, response, and recovery. These centers create opportunities for multifaceted approaches throughout the entire fire management cycle, from prevention to rapid response to restoration.

The Senate version also retains more authority for environmental reviews and judicial action. While the S. 1462 retains greater environmental review under NEPA and the National Historic Preservation Act, it also rolls back ESA reviews of land management plans and other environmental reviews depending on acreage. S. 1462 too limits injunctive relief, although not as significantly as the House version. S. 1462 leaves untouched other aspects of judicial review.

The Senate version of FOFA has garnered bipartisan support from leaders of the Republican and Democratic parties, as well as from California Governor Gavin Newsom, California Natural Resources Secretary Wade Crowfoot, and CAL Fire Director and Fire Chief Joe Tyler.

Next Steps for the Legislation

If the Senate passes a version of FOFA that is different from the House version, which is highly likely, a conference committee will be formed with members from both the House and the Senate to reconcile the differences. After the conference committee reaches agreement on a bill, both chambers must vote again to approve the reconciled bill before it can go before the President to be signed into law.

Tuleyome will continue to keep you updated on the Fix Our Forests Acts. We hope to see real-time action and solutions to improve the fire resilience of our communities and our forests and improve forest health and wildfire management.

Co-Authored by

Bryan Pride and Sandra Schubert

< Older Post

Newer Post >

RECENT ARTICLES

Policy Corner: Public Lands and Elections

May 11, 2026

At Tuleyome, we support Public Lands Advocacy, Conservation, Stewardship and Education. Our commitment to these three pillars of action means that we must encourage our supporters to vote and to invest the time to learn how candidates for public office view public lands and public access to those lands. Public lands are a central part of our national heritage and have been so since the very founding of the Republic. The first shots of the American Revolution were fired on public land (the Lexington Common) in 1775. The practice of managing lands for the common welfare is itself tens of thousands of years old and is central to the traditions of indigenous people across all of the Americas. The relatively novel notion of private ownership of land has become prevalent in our society, but that in no way should blind us to the centrality of public land to the health and welfare of all. And yet there are those who would turn every scrap of public land over to private ownership for exploitation if they could. Efforts to privatize public lands or give Federal lands to states, where political pressure to privatize is stronger, have taken on a new urgency. They represent a significant threat to the public’s right to enjoy public lands. These efforts represent an existential threat to nature, wildlife and the land itself, as exploitation of the national legacy for private gain becomes the dominant ideology of certain elements in our society. Fortunately, as citizens, we have the opportunity to educate ourselves about who supports public lands and the public’s right to benefit from public lands. If you want to be a public lands voter, here are the three questions you need to ask everyone who is asking you for your vote: Do you support keeping public lands in federal public ownership, and will you oppose efforts to transfer them to state or private control? What specific actions will you take to improve public access for hunting, fishing, and outdoor recreation? What is your plan to ensure that public lands are managed for a balance of conservation, restoration, recreation and responsible energy development? Public lands, which include our national forests, lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management and Bureau of Reclamation, as well as the national park system, are managed for all Americans. Proposals to sell or transfer these reduce public access and jeopardize wildlife habitat. Ask for a clear commitment to keeping land access public rather than transferring it to state-level management. Ask what your representatives will do to eliminate private land bottlenecks. Ask for concrete plans to improve trails, access points, and habitat connectivity. Public lands are at the center of the climate crisis debate and many voters prefer conservation and renewable energy over increased oil and gas drilling. We support a balanced approach that prioritizes habitat protection and sustainable use, rather than maximizing extraction. This is the kind of long-term legacy that we owe to the people whose land we appropriated. It’s a legacy we owe to the generations of Americans before us who fought to establish the rule of law and the values of republican government. Public lands are the embodiment of the notion that we are a nation of equal citizens, indivisible, and not servants to the economic interests that extract private profit from public resources while socializing private losses on public accounts. If you want to be a public lands voter, take the time to educate yourself by visiting https://www.tuleyome.org/ and then ask those who want your vote the hard questions about where they stand on public lands. Then, Vote! Register to Vote here: https://registertovote.ca.gov/ The last day to register to vote for the June 2, 2026, Primary Election is May 18, 2026. Find your district and voters guide here: https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections Voting by mail in California is safe and secure and really easy to do. You can track the status of your ballot here: https://california.ballottrax.net/voter/ Craig Perrin Tuleyome Volunteer Board Member

Monumental Questions - Monumental Clean Up Crew!

By Kristie Ehrhardt • May 11, 2026

Maybe you’ve seen some roadkill while driving through the Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument, along the freeway, or even in your neighborhood. Or maybe you’ve been hiking and caught a whiff of something really, really foul. Or maybe you’ve seen ants swarming on another dead insect or even come upon an animal skull during a day on the trail. Have you ever thought about what happens when an animal dies in nature and how does it “go away”? Enter nature’s clean up crew! Carrion eaters are organisms that eat dead and decaying animals. This can be roadkill, leftovers from other carnivores’ meals, animals that simply expire from old age or injury or those that have been hunted and unfortunately never recovered by their pursuer. It sounds pretty gross but carrion eaters play a critical role in ecosystem nutrient recycling. Sometimes they’re loosely called “scavengers” and one of our most valuable scavenger species is pretty common and can be seen almost anywhere in our region from urban to rural areas. Do you want to take a guess at what species it is? I’ll give you some clues… They have an exceptionally fine-tuned sense of smell and can detect the scent of rotting flesh from over a mile away. Are you jealous? Their stomach acid is ultra acidic and allows them to eat bacteria and virus-laden decaying flesh and still remain healthy. When they feel threatened they will vomit in self-defense. Considering what they eat, it’s pretty clever and effective. It also makes them weigh less so they can escape quicker. To cool off in hot weather they will defecate and/or urinate on their own legs. This is called urohydrosis. They lack vocal cords and cannot make vocalizations, they can produce only grunts and hiss sounds. Did you guess what species I’m talking about yet? Of course, it’s the Turkey Vulture! Their scientific name, Cathartes aura , literally means, “cleansing breeze”. It seems appropriate when you consider their role in removing carcasses that spread disease such as anthrax, botulism and cholera from the environment. Turkey Vultures do not have feathers on their heads and resemble wild turkeys which is where their common name came from. Although their bald, red heads don’t help endear them to those that like “pretty birds”, it does keep them clean while they jam their naked heads into sticky, stinky dead animal carcasses. Although Turkey Vultures are classified as a bird of prey, they do not have strong talons like other raptors and are not able to kill their own food which makes them reliant on carrion left behind by other carnivores, mother nature, or vehicles. Turkey Vultures also do not build nests like most other birds. Instead they lay their eggs on the ground in a sheltered place like a cave, hollow tree, rocky crevice or cliff or even in an abandoned building. I see a lot of Turkey Vultures so apparently that nesting strategy works well for them. California Condors are also carrion eaters and use the same nesting strategy but struggle with success in the wild. Unfortunately poor nesting success and other identified dangers continue to keep their free flying population fairly meager. Turkey Vultures are widely distributed and occur in nearly all of the Americas from southern Canada to the southern tip of South America. It is a permanent resident in the southern United States but northern birds may migrate south. It is found in a diverse range of habitats including deserts, grasslands, farm and rangeland, wetlands, foothills and mountains, as well as suburbia. They prefer open county without dense tree cover where they can easily take flight and enjoy the thermals. While soaring they resemble a dihedral (shallow V) and although they are master fliers, rarely flapping their wings, they appear unsteady by rocking and tilting in flight. Their slow, teetering flight allows them to fly low aiding them in detecting their next meal. Their body feathers are dark iridescent brown-black with highly contrasting silvery-gray flight feathers. Their short, hooked beaks are ivory-white against their bright red heads, juveniles’ heads are black. Their wing span is similar to Bald and Golden Eagles at around six feet and they can weigh over five pounds. The oldest wild Turkey Vulture was 16 while captive birds have lived to be 51 years old. Lead poisoning and outright killing of Turkey Vultures due to the false belief that they spread diseases (in reality they clean up the ecosystem!) are their main conservation concerns. Their population numbers remain strong with a global population estimated to be 18,000,000 individuals. Other interesting Turkey Vulture fun facts include: In the air a group of Turkey Vultures are called a “kettle” but on the ground they go by “committee” or a “wake”. Large groups of them roost together in trees and although I'm not sure what that’s called but that is an impressive sight! Gas and oil companies have been known to employ Turkey Vultures to detect pipeline leaks because the scent added to natural gas is similar to that of decaying flesh that they are so fond of. Next time you see a Turkey Vulture soaring over our favorite monument, on the way to our favorite monument or even on your way home from school or work, give them a nod for doing a bang-up job of waste management!

Enjoying Outside with Tuleyome's Boot Bank!

By Kristie Ehrhardt • May 11, 2026

Did you know that Tuleyome has a hiking equipment lending program for kids?! The idea began as a Boy Scout project back in 2016. Tuleyome collaborated with Davis Boy Scout Troop 111 and so began our Boot Bank! The Tuleyome Boot Bank is a lending program that provides gently used, high quality hiking boots and other camping equipment to kids up until age 18 for FREE! The program was founded as a way to help solve the financial burden on families who wanted to enjoy the outdoors but simply couldn’t afford to continuously buy good quality, well-fitting hiking boots for little feet that just keep growing. As a mom I understand how hard it is to part with a pair of perfectly functional little hiking boots that never fit long enough to get worn-out, just out-grown. One of Tuleyome’s aspirations is to help families enjoy and explore nature and sharing well-fitting footwear is just one of the ways that we can help do that. Initially the boots were loaned out of the back of an antique milk truck that was generously donated to Tuleyome, along with operating costs to help encourage the young program, by one of our favorite supporters. The yellow truck, affectionately nick-named “The Wonder Truck” would visit community events filled with boots of various sizes for various sized little feet. But, unlike the boots, the truck began to wear out and unfortunately parts for a 1967 Divco step van were getting harder and harder to come by. We’ve since retired our “Senior” Boot Bank truck and it can be viewed free roaming at the Woodland Regional Park Preserve where it will live in peace surrounded by nature. Our “Junior” Boot Bank is a little more spry and able to travel at freeway speeds so you might see it around town or even visiting the Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument. The program began as a kid’s hiking boot “lending library” but has since grown into a program that now includes gear that is available for short-term loan to participants in Tuleyome events such as backpacking or camping trips or to youth-serving organizations that are hosting outings. The gear library includes tents, sleeping bags, hiking poles, backpacks, headlamps and other camping and hiking equipment. The goal of the program is to encourage youth and their families to experience the pleasure of exploring the outdoors and the recreational opportunities offered by Mother Nature. We are hopeful that by participating in positive hiking and camping experiences that kids and their families will develop a love and respect for nature, conservation and public land enjoyment. Thanks to our remarkable volunteers, the boots that Tuleyome loans out are always inspected and freshened up before they are made available for borrowing. Over the years, the collection of boots have been provided through donations by individuals and corporations such as Big 5, REI and Target. If the young members of your family are in need of boots or if your organization needs gear for a trip, visit the Tuleyome office at 622 Main Street, Suite 200 in Woodland during our monthly Youth Boot Bank Office Hours, 2:30pm-5:30pm on the first Wednesday of each month. During office hours you will be able to try on several pairs of boots and check them out, return a pair you’ve already borrowed or donate boots to the program. The Boot Bank is open to anyone 18 and under and provides free loans for up to six months; at which point borrowers can renew or trade up for a larger size if necessary. *User Agreement: Boot users sign an agreement in which they agree to use the boots only for hiking, outdoor adventures and inclement weather; not for everyday use (the purpose of the Boot Bank is to encourage participation in outdoor recreational opportunities, not to meet basic shoe needs). Users agree to return the boots in good condition except for reasonable wear and tear.

Contact Info