Policy Corner: Wildfire: A Crisis In Need of a Bipartisan Solution (And, What Can the House of Representatives and the Senate Really Do?)

Bryan Pride • May 9, 2025

Across the country wildfires are increasingly more catastrophic; growing larger, spreading faster and burning longer than before. Nationwide, the total acres burned rose dramatically from 2.7 million in 2023 to nearly 9 million in 2024. California is averaging more than 7,500 wildfires annually. Not including the recent Los Angeles fires, six of the top ten most destructive fires, three of the five deadliest fires, and all of the state's nine largest fires have occurred since 2017. 


It is unsustainable for both California and the country to continue burning at this magnitude. This leaves us with the question: "What can be done to solve the wildfire problem?" 


In response to this growing crisis, lawmakers are taking action. Congress is advancing different versions of the
Fix Our Forests Act (FOFA) in the Senate and House of Representatives. How these bills progress and the opportunities to amend, change or improve these bills are constrained by the different processes in the House and the Senate.


The House of Representatives


The House of Representatives version of
FOFA, (H.R. 471), was introduced by Representative Bruce Westerman (R-AR) in January 2025 with 43 bipartisan cosponsors, including several from California.  With a stated goal to expedite forest management activities under NEPA. H.R. 471, it significantly reflectsExecutive Order 14225, "Immediate Expansion of American Timber Production" (March 1, 2025). While the legislation takes some important steps, there are also significant concerns regarding rollbacks of environmental protections and judicial review. 


FOFA
, H.R. 471, establishes an interagency Fireshed Center overseen by the Department of the Interior and U.S. Forest Service comprised of 15 agencies, administrations, departments and bureaus to gather data, provide guidance and work with states and tribes. It sets up a process to designate “fireshed management areas” and expands projects exempt from full reviews from 3,000 – 10,000 acres. The bill heavily favors logging as a form of fire management, but also embraces prescribed burns and prioritizes reforestation and restoration projects. 


H.R. 471 grants numerous “categorical exclusions”, exempting areas and projects from review under the National Environmental Policy Act, Endangered Species Act and National Historic Preservation Act. H.R. 471 also fast-tracks environmental review and consultation. At the same time, the Administration is significantly gutting personnel and expertise through DOGE and its budget.


H.R. 471 alters the judicial process. H.R. 471 limits when a court can grant injunctive relief. What is injunctive relief? That is the ability of the court to say: “Stop doing what you are doing.” Or slow it down, or change it, while we figure this out. It is common. Removing it is unusual. H.R. 471 limits the court’s ability to order corrective actions, limits plaintiff’s ability to sue, limits the court’s ability to require additional data from an agency and allows the challenged activities to go forward while under review. H.R. 471 also decreases the statute of limitations (the time that someone has to sue) from 6 years to 120 days.


Much concern was expressed over the expansion of categorical exclusions, the change in judicial review procedures and timelines and fast-tracking of proposals. However, there was no opportunity to address any of these issues. 


When a bill is introduced in the House of Representatives, much like in the Senate, it is assigned to a committee with subject matter expertise. Committees study bills, hold hearings and gather testimony from experts. Committees hold mark-up sessions to debate and make changes to the bill through amendments. When a House of Representatives Committee passes a bill, it sends the bill to the House Rules Committee. 


The House Rules committee determines the form of the bill, which amendments will be allowed, how long folks will have to speak, or not, and when the bill moves. The House Rules Committee is run by the party in power, by the majority party. The Rules Committee is heavily tilted to favor the majority party, giving it full control over the floor of the House or Representatives. The Rules Committee has nine members of the majority party, Republicans, and 4 members of the minority party, Democrats. There is no comparable Committee in the Senate. 


No committee hearings or mark-ups were held on H.R. 471. Only three amendments and only one hour of debate were allowed. In the House of Representatives, a simple majority vote is necessary for bill passage. In January 2025, the H.R. 471 passed the House of Representatives on a
vote of 279-141 without a hearing or mark-up and with scant debate.


In the Senate


Now, attention has turned to the Senate, where Senators Curtis (R-UT), Hickenlooper (D-CO), Sheehy (R-MT) and Padilla’s (D-CA) version of
FOFA, S. 1462, introduced in April, is making its way through the Senate process. The bill’s stated goal is to improve forest management on BLM and USFS lands. 


Similar to the House of Representatives, when a bill is introduced in the Senate, it is assigned to a committee for study, hearings, expert testimony, a mark-up session and amendments. In fact, the
Senate Agriculture Committeehas already begun reviewing the legislation, holding a legislative hearing on S. March 6. The next step will be a mark-up in committee, where we can expect to see robust debate.


If the Committee decides to move forward with the bill, it sends it to the full Senate. If a committee does not send the bill to the Senate, the bill dies in committee. Once a bill is released from committee, the Majority Leader of the Senate is responsible for deciding when to send the legislation for a vote. There is no Rules Committee. At this stage of floor consideration and debate is when there is the most significant difference in the legislative process between the House and the Senate. During floor consideration, a senator or group of senators can exercise their right to unlimited debate through a filibuster, which can keep legislation off the floor indefinitely. Once a debate is closed through cloture, the Senate can move to a final vote on the bill, which requires a simple majority of 51 votes. 


A bill on the Senate floor requires only 51 votes to pass after a debate has ended, but it takes 60 votes to cut off debate through a process called "cloture." If 60 Senators vote in favor of ending the debate, it will move to a final vote. Because of the razor thin margin in the Senate – 53 Rs, 45 Ds and 2 Independents – Republicans will need Democrats to vote with them to stop debate and advance
FOFA to a vote. The requirement for broader consensus often means that legislation passed by the Senate has undergone more compromise. This provides an opportunity for the minority party to shape the bill that is not present in the House of Representatives. 


Thus, the Senate version of
FOFA, S. 1462, represents a significant improvement over the House version. It too sets up “fireshed management areas” and calls for fireshed assessments, albeit based on different criteria than the House version. A centerpiece of S. 1462 is the establishment of Wildfire Intelligence Center staffed by wildfire experts, technical leads, and indigenous leaders and governed by a Board of 16 agencies, administrations, departments and bureaus. The legislation removes historical barriers that previously prevented foresters, fire teams, and indigenous communities from implementing these preventative practices, allowing for more proactive management across all phases of wildfire prevention, response, and recovery. These centers create opportunities for multifaceted approaches throughout the entire fire management cycle, from prevention to rapid response to restoration.


The Senate version also retains more authority for environmental reviews and judicial action. While the
S. 1462 retains greater environmental review under NEPA and the National Historic Preservation Act, it also rolls back ESA reviews of land management plans and other environmental reviews depending on acreage. S. 1462 too limits injunctive relief, although not as significantly as the House version. S. 1462 leaves untouched other aspects of judicial review.


The
Senate version of FOFA has garnered bipartisan support from leaders of the Republican and Democratic parties, as well as from California Governor Gavin Newsom, California Natural Resources Secretary Wade Crowfoot, and CAL Fire Director and Fire Chief Joe Tyler.


Next Steps for the Legislation


If the Senate passes a version of
FOFA that is different from the House version, which is highly likely, a conference committee will be formed with members from both the House and the Senate to reconcile the differences. After the conference committee reaches agreement on a bill, both chambers must vote again to approve the reconciled bill before it can go before the President to be signed into law. 


Tuleyome will continue to keep you updated on the
Fix Our Forests Acts. We hope to see real-time action and solutions to improve the fire resilience of our communities and our forests and improve forest health and wildfire management. 


Co-Authored by

Bryan Pride and Sandra Schubert

RECENT ARTICLES

By Bryan Pride January 20, 2026
Last year tested us. We watched as the administration attempted to auction off millions of acres of public lands, an unprecedented attack on places we’ve fought to protect for decades. We saw rollbacks of critical environmental protections and threats to lands that belong to all of us. But we also showed up. Together, as a community, we rallied, we organized, and we pushed back against some of the most aggressive land sell-offs ever proposed. And we won some of those fights. In December, just before Congress recessed, Senator Padilla introduced the Protecting Unique and Beautiful Landscapes by Investing in California (PUBLIC) Lands Act , a beacon of what’s possible when we refuse to give up. This isn’t just another bill. It’s a statement that California is refusing to let our public lands become bargaining chips. The PUBLIC Lands Act would protect over 1.7 million acres of California public lands throughout northwest California, the Central Coast and Los Angeles County. That protection includes 550,000 acres of new wilderness and nearly 700 miles of wild and scenic rivers. It includes provisions for forest restoration and fire resilience on another 871,000 acres, work that is desperately needed. This package pulls together three essential bills: Congressman Huffman's Northwest California Wilderness, Recreation and Working Forest Act , which protects 484,733 acres and 479.8 miles of rivers, old-growth forest, salmon streams and wild places that define the North Coast. Representative Carbajal’s Central Coast Heritage Protection Act secures 385,842 acres including critical habitat in Los Padres National Forest, home to California Condors and threatened watersheds. Representative Judy Chu’s San Gabriel Mountains Foothills and Rivers Protection Act that protects 35,335 acres, expanding access to nature for millions of Angelenos who live in communities with some of the lowest park access in the country despite having mountains right in their backyard. The PUBLIC Lands Act matters because it’s happening now when our public lands face their greatest threats. Our champions in Congress aren’t waiting for a better political moment, they’re fighting for these places when the fight matters most. We will be tracking this bill closely and keeping you updated as it moves through Congress. In the meantime, call your representatives and thank Senator Padilla , Representative Huffman , Representative Carabajal and Representative Chu for introducing this legislation. Let them know you support it. Our voices help move good legislation through Congress, especially when the opposition is loud. If 2025 taught us anything, it's that defending our public lands isn’t a one-time battle. It’s the work we do together, every single day. Bryan Pride Tuleyome Policy Director
By Kristie Ehrhardt January 20, 2026
It’s true! Tuleyome’s Adventures and Engagement Director Nate Lillge has assembled an incredible guide to the trails located throughout the southern portion of our newly expanded favorite monument. As you may know, the monument is jointly managed by both the Bureau of Land Management (under the United States Department of Interior) and the United States Forest Service (under the United States Department of Agriculture). The two agencies collectively manage and maintain 344,476 acres of natural wildlands in the Inner Coastal Range available for the public to appreciate and explore. That’s where Tuleyome comes in, we want to help you traverse and investigate those acres. Tuleyome’s trail guide not only provides a map of the southern portion of the monument with the trailhead names and locations, but it also shows names of the various trails that can be accessed by those trailheads along with the difficulty rating. It also contains a QR code that will take you to detailed information for each trail, including driving directions, trail maps and hike descriptions. If you’d rather go with a group, Tuleyome can help there too. Check out the Upcoming Events tab on our website to register for one or more of our organized hikes. So, if your New Year’s Resolution was to get out on more hikes in 2026, Tuleyome’s got you covered! Check out the Trail Guide here or look for our booth at one of the many community events that we participate in and pick up a printed copy. And don’t forget about our Youth Boot Bank program if your little hiker needs to borrow some boots; just come see Tuleyome’s Education Associate, Geoff Benn, during Boot Bank office hours, which are also listed under the events tab, and we’ll get your little ones outfitted for the trails too. Happy Hiking!!  -Kristie Ehrhardt ( kehrhardt@tuleyome.org ) Tuleyome Land Conservation Program Manager
By Kristie Ehrhardt January 20, 2026
Stretching from the Bering Straight off the coast of Alaska south to majestic Patagonia, the Pacific Flyway is one of the paramount migratory pathways in the entire world. Hundreds of species ranging from tiny hummingbirds, songbirds like sparrows and warblers, shorebirds like avocets, sandpipers and whimbrels, waterfowl including many species of ducks and geese to great Bald Eagles combine to equal the billions of birds that use the Pacific Flyway each migration season. With California's mild winters, available wetlands and flooded rice fields, and oodles of food, it’s not hard to see why waterfowl species like the striking white and black Snow Goose spend their winters here. As many as a million and a half Snow Geese will be using the Pacific Flyway and tens of thousands of them will remain here, in our region, for the winter. The City of Chico and surrounding communities come together to celebrate “this magnificent spectacle of nature with the Snow Goose Festival of the Pacific Flyway.” By connecting and showcasing artists, authors, educators, guides and volunteers the festival aims to excite and unite the community by increasing appreciation, awareness, conservation and understanding of the resident and visiting wildlife and their habitats in the Northern Sacramento Valley. The three day festival features art and an auction, a banquet, field trips, family activities and exhibits and workshops! Snow Geese (Anser caerulescens) breed in Greenland, Canada, Alaska and the northeastern tip of Siberia and winter in the warmer regions of southwestern British Columbia, south through the United States and Mexico. There are two color morphs, white which are called “snows” (shocking, I know) and the dark morphs which are called “blues”. Snows are all white with black wingtips while blues have dark bluish-gray plumage and a white head, neck and tip of the tail. Both color morphs have orangy-red legs and feet and a pink bill with black edges that makes it look like they are grinning. Sometimes minerals in the soil or water where they’re feeding can stain their white heads making them look orange. Snow Geese are vocal. Very vocal. Some may say they are extremely vocal and they can often be heard from more than a mile away. Frequently Snow Geese and Greater White-fronted Geese travel together as they are very similar in size and needs. Combined flocks of them can often be heard on winter days and nights as they fly high overhead to their feeding grounds. If you’re looking for a fun way to Enjoy Outdoors and learn more about the Pacific Flyway, Snow Geese and their fellow travelers, venture on up to Chico during the weekend of January 22-25, 2026. They’d love to see you at one of the many events! Please visit the website ( https://snowgoosefestival.org/ ) for a list of activities, to register and for more information. Snow Goose Fun Facts! When Snow Geese are resting or feeding, lookouts keep an eye to the sky watching for threats such as Bald Eagles or other predators which prey on old or injured geese. The lookout will vocalize and the entire flock may spontaneously take flight which is pretty stunning to watch. Snow Goose eggshells stain easily which makes aging the eggs easy, the older eggs will appear dirtier while the more recently laid eggs remain creamy white. Snow Geese populations dropped so low in the early 1900’s that hunting was no longer allowed in the eastern states. From the 1970’s and on, the population has boomed so much that some of their tundra nesting grounds are being impacted by their numbers. Once females arrive at their breeding grounds they may spend up to 20 hours a day foraging but consume nearly nothing once they begin incubating eggs. Snow Goose digestion is remarkably quick, requiring only about an hour or two to go from gullet to ground. Snow Geese make epic journeys by wing but they are not lazy on foot either. Within the first month after hatching, goslings may walk about 50 miles with their parents. When waterfowl molt they lose their ability to fly but a molting Snow Goose can outrun many predators. The oldest known Snow Goose was over 30 years old! Word Play. A group of geese on the ground or water is called a gaggle . That same collection of geese but now in the air are called a skein , a wedge or a team . Hunters use the term “ grind ” for an assemblage of geese while culinary artists use the same term to mean goose meat . BUT, if you simply call them a flock of geese, everyone will know what you’re talkin' about! -Kristie Ehrhardt ( kehrhardt@tuleyome.org ) Tuleyome Land Conservation Program Manager