Policy Corner - Monument Management, Employee Retention, & Costs of Living in Mendocino County

Hekia Bodwitch • August 9, 2024

Photo of Molok Luyuk by Mark Hoshovsky


Last month we were thrilled that the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) had filled the position of Monument manager for Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument. Our excitement reflects our appreciation of the new manager’s skills. Kay-leigh Barntiz was previously the interim manager and is a regional expert. We look forward to working with Kay-leigh to develop and implement a Monument management plan.

Our excitement also reflects the challenges BLM’s Ukiah Field Office has faced in their efforts to retain Monument management staff. Over the last five years, four different individuals have held the position of Monument manager. High turnover rates and subsequent vacancies affect BLM’s ability to protect the region’s ecological and cultural significance.

What drives these turnovers? Employee retention rates can be attributed to discrepancies between the cost of living in Mendocino County and federal employees’ salaries. BLM employees’ pay, as is the case for all federal white-collar employees, is set under the General Schedule (GS). Rates are adjusted in part through locality pay, or a percentage increase to federal employees’ "scheduled annual rate of pay," based on the region in which their “official worksite” is located. The locality pay program was established via the Federal Employees Pay Comparability Act of 1990 (FEPCA), to reduce regionally-specific wage discrepancies between federal and non-federal employees. The program holds potential to improve federal agencies’ employee retention rates, but it has yet to achieve that outcome in Mendocino County.

Instead, Mendocino County receives the lowest locality pay adjustment of any region in the country (16.82%). The County is categorized as reflecting the “Rest of US,” in that it is not eligible for a regionally-specific rate. As such, Mendocino County’s locality pay is analogous to that in South Dakota. Yet, the median listing price for homes in Mendocino County was76% higher thanthat for South Dakota in 2023. By contrast, the locality pay for neighboring Sonoma County is the highest in the nation (45.41%). Ukiah is less than 25 miles from Sonoma.

What can be done? There are four steps we can take to address discrepancies between cost of living in Ukiah and BLM employees’ salaries.

1)    Ask the Federal Salary Council to change Mendocino’s locality pay rate.

Rationale: The Federal Salary Council makes recommendations to the President’s Pay Agent on locality pay, and the Pay Agent, considers those recommendations, defines pay areas, and submits an annual report to the President on locality pay, including rates that would go into effect under the Federal Employees Pay Comparability Act of 1990 (FEPCA) absent another provision of law.

Challenge: To change Mendocino’s locality pay rate, the Federal Salary Council will need to either make an exception to or change their approach for adjusting locality pay rates. In the history of the program, regions have received locality pay adjustments if they are: (1) included in an existing locality pay area as an “area of application” or (2) established as a separate locality pay area. Mendocino County does not meet either criteria.

2)    Ask the Federal Salary Council to reevaluate how locality pay rates are set at a national scale, using Mendocino County as a case study of the program’s limitation

Rationale: The Federal Salary Council has indicated that it is disinclined to make case by case exceptions, and thus, a change to Mendocino’s locality pay rate will likely require changes to the Council’s criteria.

Challenges: This approach is politically challenging. There are regions that benefit from locality pay. Re-evaluation will take resources and significant time will pass before changes are reflected in the salaries for Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument management staff.

3)    Ask BLM to request the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) approve a Special Rate be applied to the salaries of BLM’s Ukiah Field Office employees’ salaries

Rationale: OPM may establish “Special Rates” to address staffing problems caused by various factors, including “circumstances OPM considers appropriate.”

Challenge: We see this as the most likely solution to improving the retention rates of BLM employees who manage Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument. However, as with changes to a region’s locality pay rate, funding for a Special Rates will need to come from somewhere (see below).

4)    Ask Congress to increase funding for BLM

Rationale: BLM needs resources to support their staff across the nation. There are an estimated 2,000 vacant positions at BLM, roughly 20% of that agency’s total workforce.

Challenge: Congress’ ability to fund BLM requires bi-partisan support.

What can YOU do? Congress is currently in the process of determining BLM’s budget. As this process unfolds over the next several weeks, we urge YOU to ask Congress to ensure BLM has adequate resources to manage and protect precious public lands and waters. **Click here** to submit a request.


RECENT ARTICLES

By Nate Lillge August 6, 2025
Bill Grabert is stepping down from his position as treasurer on Tuleyome’s volunteer Board of Directors – we thank him for his many years of service! Bill first joined Tuleyome as a staff member in 2016. His nature-based teaching influenced many youth over the years with school field trips throughout the Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument region, from Redbud Trail to Conaway Ranch. As part of Tuleyome’s team of instructors for the California Certified Naturalist program, Bill inspired adults to care for the region. His love of the area began as soon as he graduated from college and began working as a geologist in Lake County. Bill has devoted his diverse knowledge and skillset to care for, steward, and enjoy California’s northern Inner Coast Range Mountains for many years. He will be missed on the Board but we look forward to seeing him on the trails! -Nate Lillge (Adventures and Engagement Director)  and Lyndsay Dawkins (Volunteer Tuleyome Board President)
By Bryan Pride August 6, 2025
Fifty-eight and a half million acres of America's wildest forests have been protected for nearly 25 years by the Roadless Rule, a conservation cornerstone that could soon disappear. Established in 2001, the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (RACR) , more commonly known as the Roadless Rule, designated "Inventoried Roadless Areas" (IRAs) across our nation's forests, prohibiting new roads from being built. Now, USDA Secretary Rollins wants to rescind it . From Alaska to California, the losses from this rollback would be massive. In Alaska, 92% of the Tongass National Forest could lose protection, threatening one of the world's most pristine ecosystems and the indigenous communities who call it home. California would lose protections across 4.4 million acres spanning 21 national forests , which has the potential to impact treasured places like Inyo, Shasta-Trinity, and the Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument. Rule Born from Necessity, Not Ideology The Roadless Rule traces back to 1998, when U.S. Forest Service Chief Mike Dombeck saw the agency's vast road system as a major environmental and fiscal problem . To put this in perspective: the Forest Service maintains eight times more miles of road than the Interstate Highway System. The agency had too many roads to properly maintain for safety and environmental purposes, with poorly maintained roads contributing to erosion and other harms across national forests. The road maintenance backlog had ballooned to $8.4 billion while the agency received only 20% of the funding needed to maintain roads to environmental and safety standards. Dombeck proposed a moratorium on road construction in undeveloped forest areas across most of the National Forest System. The agency adopted an 18-month moratorium in February 1999 pending completion of an overall road management plan. Later that year, the agency undertook a rule making process to provide long-term administrative protection for roadless areas. The Forest Service conducted an extensive public involvement process that produced 1.7 million comments , with the majority favoring a strong national policy protecting roadless areas. The resulting Roadless Rule was not and is still not a blanket ban: it makes exceptions to allow access to non-federal land inholdings and pre-existing mineral leases, and allows logging to reduce fire risk, improve habitat or aid in the recovery of endangered species. What began as a fiscally prudent solution to an unwieldy road network became a cornerstone of forest conservation, one that Americans overwhelmingly supported then and continue to support today. The Administration's Claims vs. Reality According to USDA Secretary Rollins , the rule is “overly restrictive”, hinders fire prevention and responsible timber production, therefore the Rule poses “real harm to millions of acres of our national forests.” Rollins linked rescinding the Rule with Presidential Executive Order 14192, "Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation .” The reality is different. Rollins' claim ignores what's actually at stake. Roadless areas are essential ecosystems that provide clean air and water while keeping wilderness intact. They also serve as critical refuges for wildlife; 57% of America's most vulnerable species depend on roadless areas for habitat. For the 156 million Americans who visit national forests annually, these areas offer irreplaceable backcountry recreation experiences. Most strikingly, the administration's fire prevention argument is backwards. Scientific research reveals that 88% of wildfires are human-caused , and 95% of these fires start within half a mile of a road. Areas closest to roads experience 53% more fires than would occur by random chance. Less than 3% of wildfires start in wilderness areas more than a mile from roads. This research indicates that more roads through our forests are more likely to increase fires and would outweigh the effects of improving fire containment. While the administration claims roads improve fire response, fire management teams consistently identify inadequate resources and personnel shortages, not roads , as the primary barriers to effective wildfire management . Rather than building roads that increase fire risk, fire management experts advocate for investing in cultural and prescribed burns, fire mitigation and forest restoration, proven approaches that are underfunded but key to preventing future fires and reducing fire magnitude. What's Next? Rescinding the Roadless Rule will require a public comment period that has yet to be announced. This is when we can all share our views. Tuleyome will be following this issue closely and will be commenting. For more information on the Roadless Rule and how to participate in the public comment process or other advocacy opportunities, contact B ryan Pr ide .
By Kristie Ehrhardt August 6, 2025
The short answer is honestly, pretty much anywhere! Because the 344,476 acre Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument (the Monument) is located in the rural areas of Colusa, Glenn, Lake, Mendocino, Napa, Solano and Yolo counties you will have a great view of the dark night sky, free from urban light pollution from virtually anywhere within its boundaries! The Monument is an easy drive from not only the metropolitan Sacramento area but also from the San Francisco Bay Area as well as the North Bay communities making it an easy day trip. If you’re here especially for the Perseid meteor shower though it might be a very long day since best viewing happens between the hours of midnight and early morning. If you’re adventurous and up for an all-nighter, be certain to pack plenty of water and snacks and be sure to pull over only where it is safe and you’re not blocking a road, especially when it’s dark. Also always keep safety in mind and look out for wildlife as the Monument is home to black bears, mountain lions, coyotes, tule elk and bobcats that may be traveling through the area as well. If you’d like to stay a night (or several), there are multiple developed campgrounds to choose from inside the Monument boundaries. If you’re up camping, check out The Blue Oaks Campground, Indian Valley Campground, Hunting Creek Campground, Deer Valley Campground, Lower Nye Campground, West Crocket Campground or Kowalski Camping area just to name a few of the sites available for overnight stays. Before you go though, please do check with the United States Forest Service or the Bureau of Land Management websites for details on the particular camping area you’re interested in as well as current conditions, requirements and fire restrictions. The Monument also offers primitive camping in the three wilderness areas located within the Monument boundaries. Cache Creek Wilderness, Cedar Roughs Wilderness and Snow Mountain Wilderness present nearly unlimited opportunities for dispersed camping or backcountry camping (areas located outside of designated campgrounds). Although camping is allowed and encouraged, these areas have no amenities such as tables, toilets, available water or waste removal and require you to pack out all trash and waste. There are no motorized vehicles allowed within Wilderness areas and they provide places for deep solitude with nature. Camping in Wilderness areas or other dispersed camping areas require visitors to understand and follow the Leave No Trace principles of outdoor recreating as well as planning ahead and knowing the area and what to pack. That said, other than the trees potentially blocking some of the night sky, you’re sure to avoid urban light pollution and have an unobstructed view of the night sky from practically anywhere within the Monument! -Kristie Ehrhardt ( kehrhardt@tuleyome.org ) Tuleyome Land Conservation Program Manager