Science Corner - Non-native Species, Friend or Foe

Kristie Ehrhardt • October 2, 2025

Admittedly European Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) are pretty cool birds. They are relatively intelligent for possessing a bird brain and can vocally mimic over twenty different bird species including American Robin, Killdeer, Red-tailed hawk, Northern Flicker and Western Meadowlark just to name a few local birds. They can fly at nearly 50 miles giving us those fascinating aerial displays called murmurations and have been wildly successful at crowding out native bird species. You may have heard that they were released into New York’s Central Park in the 1890’s but they were also released in several other states including Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts and even Quebec, Canada. It appears to have been the few dozen birds released in Central Park that eventually became successful and today there are an estimated 200 million breeding adult European Starlings in North America - all believed to be descendents of the original few. European Starlings (starlings) are responsible for causing billions of dollars annually to fruit crops such as apples, cherries, figs, grapes, peaches and strawberries as well as transmitting bacterial, fungal and viral pathogens and parasites to livestock as well as decimating their feed. Gathering and roosting in huge flocks, their droppings soil buildings, windows, sidewalks and anything else that happens to be in the way. It can corrode metal if not cleaned off promptly and also can transmit Salmonella and E.coli causing a public health hazard. 


Introducing plants and wildlife into a region where they have no natural predators makes their establishment uncomplicated, unchallenged and almost effortless.  Just a few other non-native species that became introduced over a short period of time include vegetation such as Japanese knotweed, a dense, rapidly growing plant that crowds out native species and damages drainage systems and buildings by growing through cracks. The list also includes bacteria, fungi and viruses such as West Nile virus and Bird flu (both of these are an ongoing battle), Small Pox (we all know what that did)  and Dutch Elm disease, a fungus that killed a majority of the Elm trees in North America in just two short decades. Aggressive insects that have been introduced include the Formosan termite that causes over one billion dollars in damages annually to US homeowners and Murder Hornets, the two inch long jerk that can decimate a honey bee colony in less than two hours (thankfully it is believed that they have been eradicated). The invasive sea lamprey has very nearly wiped out the entire lake trout fishing industry in the Great Lakes. Giant Asian Carp and the Burmese Python have both caused a  huge ruckus and extensive environmental damage while ship rats have provided us with both the plague and typhus. Currently here in our region we are fighting a battle with Zebra Mussels, desperately trying to keep them out of waterways where they have not been observed by cleaning and quarantining water craft and equipment. 


Globally, invasive species cause over $400 billion in damages annually, most of them occurring in the agricultural industry with an estimated $150 billion in losses here in the United States. Add to that the billions of dollars spent aimed at keeping additional invasive species out of the United States by agencies such as the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and The Bureau of Land Management (BLM).


Laws have been passed aimed at making it illegal to knowingly import injurious species into the US but some argue that we could be doing more. Island nations such as Australia and New Zealand ban plants and animals unless they appear on an “approved” list while the United States allows them in unless they are on the “banned” list. 


It’s not all dismal though. There have been some benefits to introducing non-native species. In 1898 the USDA created an agency called the Office of Plant Introduction that was responsible for collecting, introducing and distributing economically valuable plants and seeds from around the world. The agency ultimately imported over 200,000 useful species of plants to the US and was instrumental in industrializing our agriculture industry. Some of these plants have become major agricultural staples in California and the rest of the United States including fruits and vegetables such as artichokes, avocados, carob, chayote, citrus fruits, dates, lychee, mangos and papaya. Hard red wheat and durum wheat was also brought into the US from Russia and the Ukraine and have become significant grain crops in the US. And, all know the importance of California’s rice industry!


For the record, I have to confess that I don’t hate starlings (but as a biologist maybe I should?). I think their murmurations are enchanting. I think it’s intriguing that they go from having white speckles to being a solid, glossy iridescent dark brown without shedding their feathers (the speckles are white tipped feathers that get worn as the season goes on leaving them a solid dark color). And I think that their charismatic vocal abilities are incredibly charming. 

RECENT ARTICLES

October 2, 2026
 On August 29, USDA published a notice of intent to eliminate the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule – the Roadless Rule, jeopardizing protections for 45 million acres of America's wildest forests , about a third of our national forests. Throughout Mendocino National Forest, 154,332 acres of Roadless Areas would lose protection, including nearly 30,000 acres within Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument. What's at Stake These forests have only remained intact because of the 25-year commitment not to build roads and open these special areas to industry. Roadless areas provide clean drinking water to 60 million Americans. These forests store 20% of all carbon in U.S. national forests. The outdoor recreation economy generates $730 billion annually. Roadless areas are critical habitat for 1,600+ threatened species. We already have 370,000 miles of roads in forests with a multi-billion dollar maintenance backlog. Studies show wildfire ignitions are 4 times more likely near roads than in roadless areas. We Have Until September 21 st to Save America’s Roadless Forests This our opportunity to inform USDA that we are opposed to rolling back the Roadless Rule. Our goal is one million comments in support of the Roadless Rule What Can You Do? Submit Comments Supporting the Roadless Rule Directly to USDA or Click Here to Sign on to Tuleyome’s letter Our goal is to get 1,000,000 comments into USDA in support of the Roadless Rule! Information on How to Submit Public Comments for USDA Roadless Rule Step 1: Think about what types of comments you want to share with USDA. Here are some suggestions on what makes a good comment: Be specific about what roadless lands matter to you and why, whether for water, wildlife, recreation, wild fire prevention, cultural sites or old growth trees. Show how you will be personally harmed if these protections are removed. That harm can be direct, like losing access to a favorite place, or it can be health-related. Road-building and logging increase smoke, dust and polluted runoff that affect human health. Point to consequences, since roads lead to the removal of trees, severing connected wilderness corridors, erosion and higher fire risk. Call out contradictions such as: Forest service promises conservation while encouraging logging USDA states the Roadless Rule hinders wildfire management but more roads actually increase the likelihood of fire ignition points Feel free to borrow ideas from others or sample letters while maintaining your own voice, this is your opportunity to contribute and speak truth to power. Include your full name and address. Step 2: Go to the Regulations.gov site. This is the official federal government website to submit comments. Step 3: Copy and paste or upload your comments as a PDF. Step 4: Scroll to the bottom of the page, verify that you’re not a robot and hit submit. Consider keeping a copy of your comments for your record. As a reminder the comment period ends on September 21st.
By Shai Demus • September 10, 2026
 Yosemite National Park belongs to the people. It should not be carved up to benefit a private developer. The National Park Service is working on a new proposal to give up a quarter-mile strip of land inside Yosemite National Park in exchange for property elsewhere in California. What's the goal? To provide a private developer with a new road and direct access from his 83-acre planned real estate development abutting the park to one of Yosemite’s central roads. This proposal deserves the public’s attention. The property is owned by Kingsbarn Realty Capitol, whose CEO wants to build a road connecting the private property to Yosemite. Previous efforts to establish this private access were rejected, including in federal court. The National Park Service has repeatedly refused similar requests for more than two decades. Our National Parks should not be carved up for private profit. National Parks were established in this country to protect America’s most interesting and iconic places for everyone to access, not to provide special access or development opportunities for private interests. Your action is especially timely because the Park Service has acknowledged that no final decision has been made, meaning there is still an opportunity for public scrutiny and opposition. Any eventual land exchange should be subject to federal laws, environmental review, and public notification requirements. Tell the National Park Service: Keep Yosemite public We can’t allow a national park to be reshaped around the interests of a private developer. Yosemite is a national treasure. Its lands, wildlife, cultural resources, and landscapes belong to the American people, and they should remain protected for generations to come. We have seen this kind of proposal before, and the public and the courts rejected it. We must make sure it does not come back through the back door. Yosemite is worth protecting. Speak up and keep it public. TAKE ACTION: Tell Interior Secretary Burgum to Keep Yosemite Public! Here’s How: Call your elected officials. Here is a sample script: “Hi, my name is [NAME] and I'm a constituent from [CITY/ZIP]. I'm calling to urge [Representative/Senator NAME] to publicly oppose the National Park Service's proposed land exchange inside Yosemite National Park, which would give a billionaire private developer, Kingsbarn Realty Capital, new road access through park land. I'm also asking [him/her/them] to call on Interior Secretary Doug Burgum to reject any further privatization or sell-off of our public lands. Yosemite belongs to the public, not private developers. Thank you.” Send a letter or email. You can use this template: Dear [Representative/Senator NAME], I’m writing as your constituent to urge you to oppose the National Park Service’s proposed land exchange inside Yosemite National Park. This proposal would trade a strip of park land to provide Kingsbarn Realty Capital, a billionaire private developer, with new road access from an 83-acre private property to one of Yosemite’s central roads. This is not the first attempt to establish this private access – previous efforts were rejected, including in federal court, and the Park Service has denied similar requests for more than two decades. Our public lands exist to serve the public, not to create development opportunities for billionaires. I ask that you publicly oppose this proposal and call on Interior Secretary Doug Burgum to keep Yosemite, and all our national parks, fully public and protected for future generations. Thank you for representing our community on this issue. Sincerely, [NAME] [ADDRESS/ZIP] Not sure who represents you? Find your U.S. Representative and Senators here .
By Nate Lillge • September 10, 2026
I first learned of Tuleyome in 2015 when the Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument was created and it was in the news. I thought then of what a marvelous and impressive, important effort this was by so many people, including Tuleyome. Importantly it was so inclusive, involving people of so many different backgrounds and interests, getting the buy-in from the community at large. Once I learned about Tuleyome (and the meaning of the name - deep home place) and some of its conservation efforts, I decided that I wanted to contribute, at least in a small way. I come from a farming and research background, and newly retired, wanted to be more involved in conservation efforts and Tuleyome was local and ideal! I think the aspect of Tuleyome’s work that most resonated with me is the focus on educational programs for young people and adults. As an older person, I know that experiences we have in childhood have life-long impacts. Let them be positive and enriching experiences and let them include conservation and the natural world! Young people have many demands on their time and attention and most have limited exposure to nature. Regardless of our career paths, an appreciation of nature is vital for the well-being of us all. As a docent helper this past spring I was touched by three students who said this was the first time they had been out in nature. In 2024 I had the opportunity to participate in the Certified California Naturalist Program (CalNat) and was inspired by the lead instructors Geoff Benn and Nate Lillge, and invited speakers. And, I love the new manual about the Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument , especially the geology section. My donations can be used toward any need but I particularly want to support the educational efforts for young people. The National monument is a treasure in our backyards. Its creation and subsequent enlargement in 2024, reminded me of the adage “think globally, act locally”. The multi-pronged conservation efforts of Tuleyome and its commitment to a diverse regional community are such important and positive actions. I see Tuleyome as a small but powerful inspiring organization.