Monumental Questions - I’ve heard the Fisher lives in the Monument but can you tell me more about them?

Kristie Ehrhardt • April 25, 2022

Fisher or Pacific Fisher (Photo by USFWS)

Fishers are one of the rarest carnivores documented within the Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument boundaries. They’re elusive, solitary, and nocturnal and although you may never see one, you are probably familiar with other members of the Mustalid family which also includes otter, mink, marten, badger and wolverine (another special status species you may never see). Interestingly, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) uses the common name Pacific fisher while the United States Department of Fish and Wildlife (USFWS) uses just fisher, both refer to the same genus and species - Pekania pennanti. Fishers are only found in North America from New England to Tennessee, around northern Wisconsin and Michigan, the northern Rockies and a few small west coast populations in Oregon and California. 


Fishers are about the size of a house cat weighing between four and twelve pounds, but are shaped a little differently with longer bodies, stout legs and long, sturdy tails. They have strong feet with retractable claws. Their fur is lush and dense and is usually a lighter brown near their head and neck and gets darker, almost black, toward their hind end and has a distinctive musky scent. As with other relatives in the family, the fisher is designed to hunt although it does not eat fish as the name suggests. Primarily a carnivore, they survive on a variety of small mammals and birds but will also eat insects, fruits, nuts and fungus. Fishers are one of the only species known to take on and eat porcupines! 


Within their range, fishers inhabit large expanses of older mid-elevation (7,000-12,000 feet) pine and oak forests and prefer areas interspersed with lots of young and downed trees for hunting and cover. They den in hollows in older trees or in rocky crevices and forage in the dense undergrowth. Fishers are known to have multiple den sites and will frequently relocate their kits as needed to keep them safe. Fishers are very agile and are climbing professionals with specialized hind legs and feet that turn almost completely backwards giving them the capability to climb down trees head first.


Fishers are polygnous, meaning the male mates with more than one female during their mating season and because of this, the males’ home range is nearly twice the size of the females’ home range. Mating season is short, typically only occurring between March and April, however females have a reproductive strategy called “delayed implantation”. The eggs become fertilized during the brief mating season but the embryo does not begin to develop until several months later. This allows the birth to happen when resources are more abundant. This strategy helps species survive in highly seasonal environments but also lengthens the duration of the reproductive cycle. One to four kits are born about 40 days after implantation, usually February to April, just in time to mate again. The kits are born helpless and blind. Their eyes take about two months to open and once that happens, they are weaned shortly after. The young will stay with their mother until the fall and then venture out to set up their own home range. It usually takes two to three years for the young females to successfully reproduce.


Threats to the fisher populations include historic over harvesting for pelts and habitat loss due to logging, road construction and wildfires. Currently, only the distinct southern Sierra Nevada population is listed as state and federally threatened and afforded special-status species protection. In 2021, the USFWS designated 554,454 acres in the southern Sierra Nevada as critical habitat for the species. It is believed that there are only 300 adult fishers in this population.


-Kristie Ehrhardt; kehrhardt@tuleyome.org


Tuleyome Land Conservation Program Manager

RECENT ARTICLES

June 5, 2025
We extend our thanks and gratitude to Stephen McCord as he ends his tenure on the Tuleyome Board of Directors. Stephen has applied his energy and expertise to fulfilling Tuleyome’s mission for many years. In 2016 he managed the first Tuleyome mercury mine remediation project at the Corona/Twin Peaks Mine. He followed that with work on Tuleyome trail projects in the Knoxville Off-Highway Vehicle Area, riding all the trails on his own adventure motorcycle. As a Tuleyome representative, he’s taken many community members on hikes in Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument and the surrounding areas. Stephen has over 20 years of environmental engineering experience, in California and worldwide. He has overseen extensive projects in water quality field work, management and cleanup, and has applied his knowledge to policy development, analysis and technical support. In short, Stephen is a consummate environmental and water engineer, and he brought his expertise to Tuleyome’s many projects. In 2023 Stephen joined the Board of Directors and agreed to serve as President. He applied his supreme organizational skills to managing board duties and activities. He also brought an optimism to the board about what can be accomplished with foresight, good planning and collaboration. Stephen has been a tireless advocate for Tuleyome, keeping the board on task even while handling numerous other professional responsibilities. Fortunately, although he is stepping down from the board, he will continue to support Tuleyome’s mission in many other ways. -Kim Longworth, Lyndsay Dawkins and Bill Grabert Volunteer Tuleyome Board members 
By Geoff Benn June 5, 2025
A river otter making its way up the slide. Looking to take a break with some cute video content? This month we placed game cameras looking into an otter slide at Conaway Ranch. Otter slides are paths worn into riverbanks by repeated use by otters and other animals. The slides at Conaway are quite active, so we’ve been able to get some great footage, including otters, beavers, racoons, snakes, and more! 
By Bryan Pride June 5, 2025
Since April 2024, America's public lands had something they'd never had before: a rule that treated conservation as equal to all other land uses. The Public Lands Rule , introduced by the Biden Administration, formally recognized conservation as a legitimate practice of multiple use, putting conservation on equal footing with recreation, grazing, and resource extraction. Built on decades of management experience and guided by science, data, and Indigenous knowledge, it gives land managers tools to maintain healthy ecosystems while supporting all the diverse ways we depend on public lands. It acknowledges a simple truth: conservation must be valued equally to all other land uses. Now there is growing pressure to rescind it. Why This Matters The environment around us is free-flowing, it's not confined to state borders or county lines. When mining operations contaminate watersheds in Northern California, it impacts the local businesses who depend on healthy rivers downstream, the agricultural communities that rely on clean water, and the families who've been camping along those waterways for generations. The Public Lands Rule recognized this interconnected reality and gave land managers agency to address problems before they spread across California's diverse landscapes, protecting the long-term viability of grazing allotments, recreation areas, and rural livelihoods that all depend on healthy public lands. This interconnected reality is exactly why the Public Lands Rule matters. The Rule is designed to ensure that the places we depend on, whether for weekend camping trips, or cattle grazing, stay healthy enough to support these uses long-term. When an area becomes overgrazed and doesn't recover, access to those grazing allotments is permanently lost, reducing ranchers' ability to maintain their livelihoods and harming local food production. Poor use or overuse of our public lands creates ripples of negative impact that hurt all communities. The Rule's main objective is simple but revolutionary: make sure our public lands stay productive for everyone who depends on them, rather than degrade them. The Rule created practical tools that built in accountability and prioritized future generations' access to healthy public lands. Restoration Leases : 10-year agreements allowing a variety of entities such as, conservation groups, tribes, and nonprofits to restore damaged landscapes—fires restoration, restoring wildlife habitats and cleaning up abandoned mining sites that currently scar some of our most beautiful public lands. Mitigation Leases : A tool that allows land users or other entities to offset impacts from their activities over specified time periods, creating partnerships between different land users and conservation groups to address environmental impacts on public lands. Strengthened Protection for Critical Areas : Clearer guidelines for protecting Areas of Critical Environmental Concern—the most special and fragile places that often provide the best wildlife viewing, the cleanest water sources, the most pristine camping experiences and the richest biodiversity. The False Dichotomy: Multiple Use vs. Conservation The main argument being used to encourage the rollback of the Public Lands Rule is " multiple use ", the legal principle requiring Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands to serve many different purposes. The current Administration claims the Public Lands Rule hinders multiple uses of public lands. Why? The Rule calls for restoring degraded areas and making science based decisions. Contrary to their actual meaning, the current Administration interprets "restoring" and "science based decisions" as "locking up land". Land locking, where access gets completely cut off, is a real concern in some areas—it prevents both recreation and grazing. However, land locking is not what the Public Lands Rule promotes. In reality, it is promoting land healing. Take grazing for example. The Rule empowers BLM to use restoration leases in conjunction with existing grazing permittees to restore degraded rangeland. Monitoring who is grazing where and the number of permits issued for specific areas is a means to ensure sustainable grazing and prevent overuse. Many ranchers and land managers supported the Rule because they understand that healthy land is productive land. Overgrazing and environmental damage hurt their livelihoods too. The same principle applies to fire recovery. When public lands are damaged by sweeping wildfires, there is a need for active restoration: replanting native vegetation, stabilizing soils, removing hazardous debris. Restoration has to take place before safe recreation, grazing and other uses can resume. At times, restoration requires temporarily limiting access to burned areas as they recover. The goal is to allow for our lands to recover and heal before we start depending on them again with our multiple uses. Land restoration is not just limited to grazing or extraction; it is essential for recovering from wildfires. Whether it's grazing, recreation, or extraction, the Public Lands Rule isn't about stopping these uses, it's about understanding that healthy ecosystems are prerequisites for multiple use, not obstacles to it. You can't have sustainable grazing on degraded rangeland, quality recreation in fire damaged landscapes, or responsible extraction without considering long-term impacts We Are Public Stewards The Public Lands Rule represents a historic shift in how we value conservation, its potential rollback is a setback. But the vision it represents, conservation as a form of legitimate multiple use, remains essential and is not gone. As stewards of these 245 million acres, we have the power to practice conservation in our own actions and advocacy. Every time we practice Leave No Trace, support local businesses that operate responsibly on public lands, and make our voices heard in land management decisions, we're building the foundation for balanced stewardship that benefits everyone. Our public lands belong to all of us, which means we each have the power, and responsibility, to be good stewards of the lands we love. -Bryan Pride ( bpride@tuleyome.org ) Certified California Naturalist Policy Director