Science Corner - Invasive Goldfish

Kristie Ehrhardt • November 7, 2024

When my daughter was a kindergartener, she “won” a few little goldfish from a school carnival. We brought those little guys home and put them in a small aquarium and gave them all names: Chloe, Biscuit and Sarah. That next summer we added Jack who was rescued from the ring toss game at the 110-degree California State Fair. Eventually Sarah and Biscuit passed away, but Chloe and Jack lived to the ripe old age of thirteen and fourteen. We continuously got them bigger and bigger aquariums and they got so enormous that they didn’t fit in an aquarium net anymore. Sadly, they both passed away and are buried in the backyard.

 

Goldfish (Carassius auratus) are a freshwater fish that is native to southern China. It was originally believed that modern goldfish were a subspecies of the crucian carp (Carassius carassius) or the Prussian carp (C. gibelio), collectively called Asian carp; but through genetic sequencing and investigation of morphology, it is now believed that common goldfish are a domesticated variety of C. auratus. Goldfish belong to the carp and minnow family which were originally reared to be used as fish food. Naturally silver or gray, carp occasionally produced offspring with color mutations that produced red, orange, gold or white fish. These vibrantly colored fish became popular, and people began to put them in ornamental water gardens. Later, these fish began to be selectively bred for their colors, body shape, fin structure and size which resulted in distinct breeds that varied greatly. Not long after goldfish began to be raised indoors and were subsequently introduced into Japan and Portugal and later into the rest of Europe.

 

Goldfish are gregarious and friendly with each other. They have good eyesight and can recognize their owner. They have memory capabilities and can recognize different shapes and colors, can learn tricks and can even be hand fed.

 

Goldfish are hardy and are easy to keep in outdoor ponds because they can bear cooler water temperatures and short periods of low oxygen. They can even survive if ice has formed on the top of the water as long as there is enough dissolved oxygen in the water. And, although considered a freshwater fish, they have been found surviving in brackish water.

 

Some breeds of goldfish can live for decades and can become quite large like my two. Because of this, goldfish often get released into the wild where they become a highly invasive species. Without the restrictions of the backyard pond or aquarium, goldfish released into the wild can grow to be significantly larger than those kept in captivity. They have voracious appetites and outcompete native species for food such as algae and small invertebrates, as well as consuming native species’ eggs and larvae. They swim and graze along the bottom stirring up sediment which increases water turbidity that reduces the amount of sunlight that penetrates the water column which affects aquatic plants and expands habitat loss for native species. Goldfish also have a high reproduction rate which aids in them outcompeting native fish and can hybridize with other carp species further increasing their population numbers. They can also carry bacteria and diseases that may harm native aquatic life.

 

All of these combined intensifies their impact on biodiversity and ecosystem health. The United States Geological Survey has indicated that goldfish have been released into American waterways since the 1600’s. They have become one of the most widespread invasive species of fish in North America. Huge goldfish have even been caught in Lake Tahoe ranging from four to eight inches long and weighing up to several pounds. Biologists believe that the goldfish were introduced into the lake by people that kept them as pets. Although the fish are already in the lake and eradication efforts are taking place, the United States Forest Service Lake Tahoe Basin Management United and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife are urging people not to release their pet fish (or leftover bait fish) into Lake Tahoe or it’s associated waterways. In Minnesota, Colorado and Canada goldfish have become an imposing problem. The Carver County Water Management agency in Minnesota recently removed 50,000 pounds of goldfish from a tributary to one single lake.

 

All drains do not lead to the ocean and indeed, goldfish do make great pets but they are best left in their tanks.


-Kristie Ehrhardt (kehrhardt@tuleyome.org)

Tuleyome Land Conservation Program Manager

RECENT ARTICLES

June 5, 2025
We extend our thanks and gratitude to Stephen McCord as he ends his tenure on the Tuleyome Board of Directors. Stephen has applied his energy and expertise to fulfilling Tuleyome’s mission for many years. In 2016 he managed the first Tuleyome mercury mine remediation project at the Corona/Twin Peaks Mine. He followed that with work on Tuleyome trail projects in the Knoxville Off-Highway Vehicle Area, riding all the trails on his own adventure motorcycle. As a Tuleyome representative, he’s taken many community members on hikes in Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument and the surrounding areas. Stephen has over 20 years of environmental engineering experience, in California and worldwide. He has overseen extensive projects in water quality field work, management and cleanup, and has applied his knowledge to policy development, analysis and technical support. In short, Stephen is a consummate environmental and water engineer, and he brought his expertise to Tuleyome’s many projects. In 2023 Stephen joined the Board of Directors and agreed to serve as President. He applied his supreme organizational skills to managing board duties and activities. He also brought an optimism to the board about what can be accomplished with foresight, good planning and collaboration. Stephen has been a tireless advocate for Tuleyome, keeping the board on task even while handling numerous other professional responsibilities. Fortunately, although he is stepping down from the board, he will continue to support Tuleyome’s mission in many other ways. -Kim Longworth, Lyndsay Dawkins and Bill Grabert Volunteer Tuleyome Board members 
By Geoff Benn June 5, 2025
A river otter making its way up the slide. Looking to take a break with some cute video content? This month we placed game cameras looking into an otter slide at Conaway Ranch. Otter slides are paths worn into riverbanks by repeated use by otters and other animals. The slides at Conaway are quite active, so we’ve been able to get some great footage, including otters, beavers, racoons, snakes, and more! 
By Bryan Pride June 5, 2025
Since April 2024, America's public lands had something they'd never had before: a rule that treated conservation as equal to all other land uses. The Public Lands Rule , introduced by the Biden Administration, formally recognized conservation as a legitimate practice of multiple use, putting conservation on equal footing with recreation, grazing, and resource extraction. Built on decades of management experience and guided by science, data, and Indigenous knowledge, it gives land managers tools to maintain healthy ecosystems while supporting all the diverse ways we depend on public lands. It acknowledges a simple truth: conservation must be valued equally to all other land uses. Now there is growing pressure to rescind it. Why This Matters The environment around us is free-flowing, it's not confined to state borders or county lines. When mining operations contaminate watersheds in Northern California, it impacts the local businesses who depend on healthy rivers downstream, the agricultural communities that rely on clean water, and the families who've been camping along those waterways for generations. The Public Lands Rule recognized this interconnected reality and gave land managers agency to address problems before they spread across California's diverse landscapes, protecting the long-term viability of grazing allotments, recreation areas, and rural livelihoods that all depend on healthy public lands. This interconnected reality is exactly why the Public Lands Rule matters. The Rule is designed to ensure that the places we depend on, whether for weekend camping trips, or cattle grazing, stay healthy enough to support these uses long-term. When an area becomes overgrazed and doesn't recover, access to those grazing allotments is permanently lost, reducing ranchers' ability to maintain their livelihoods and harming local food production. Poor use or overuse of our public lands creates ripples of negative impact that hurt all communities. The Rule's main objective is simple but revolutionary: make sure our public lands stay productive for everyone who depends on them, rather than degrade them. The Rule created practical tools that built in accountability and prioritized future generations' access to healthy public lands. Restoration Leases : 10-year agreements allowing a variety of entities such as, conservation groups, tribes, and nonprofits to restore damaged landscapes—fires restoration, restoring wildlife habitats and cleaning up abandoned mining sites that currently scar some of our most beautiful public lands. Mitigation Leases : A tool that allows land users or other entities to offset impacts from their activities over specified time periods, creating partnerships between different land users and conservation groups to address environmental impacts on public lands. Strengthened Protection for Critical Areas : Clearer guidelines for protecting Areas of Critical Environmental Concern—the most special and fragile places that often provide the best wildlife viewing, the cleanest water sources, the most pristine camping experiences and the richest biodiversity. The False Dichotomy: Multiple Use vs. Conservation The main argument being used to encourage the rollback of the Public Lands Rule is " multiple use ", the legal principle requiring Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands to serve many different purposes. The current Administration claims the Public Lands Rule hinders multiple uses of public lands. Why? The Rule calls for restoring degraded areas and making science based decisions. Contrary to their actual meaning, the current Administration interprets "restoring" and "science based decisions" as "locking up land". Land locking, where access gets completely cut off, is a real concern in some areas—it prevents both recreation and grazing. However, land locking is not what the Public Lands Rule promotes. In reality, it is promoting land healing. Take grazing for example. The Rule empowers BLM to use restoration leases in conjunction with existing grazing permittees to restore degraded rangeland. Monitoring who is grazing where and the number of permits issued for specific areas is a means to ensure sustainable grazing and prevent overuse. Many ranchers and land managers supported the Rule because they understand that healthy land is productive land. Overgrazing and environmental damage hurt their livelihoods too. The same principle applies to fire recovery. When public lands are damaged by sweeping wildfires, there is a need for active restoration: replanting native vegetation, stabilizing soils, removing hazardous debris. Restoration has to take place before safe recreation, grazing and other uses can resume. At times, restoration requires temporarily limiting access to burned areas as they recover. The goal is to allow for our lands to recover and heal before we start depending on them again with our multiple uses. Land restoration is not just limited to grazing or extraction; it is essential for recovering from wildfires. Whether it's grazing, recreation, or extraction, the Public Lands Rule isn't about stopping these uses, it's about understanding that healthy ecosystems are prerequisites for multiple use, not obstacles to it. You can't have sustainable grazing on degraded rangeland, quality recreation in fire damaged landscapes, or responsible extraction without considering long-term impacts We Are Public Stewards The Public Lands Rule represents a historic shift in how we value conservation, its potential rollback is a setback. But the vision it represents, conservation as a form of legitimate multiple use, remains essential and is not gone. As stewards of these 245 million acres, we have the power to practice conservation in our own actions and advocacy. Every time we practice Leave No Trace, support local businesses that operate responsibly on public lands, and make our voices heard in land management decisions, we're building the foundation for balanced stewardship that benefits everyone. Our public lands belong to all of us, which means we each have the power, and responsibility, to be good stewards of the lands we love. -Bryan Pride ( bpride@tuleyome.org ) Certified California Naturalist Policy Director