SAN PABLO BAY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE EXPANSION ACT

Representative John Garamendi (D-CA08) released a discussion draft in September 2023 of the San Pablo Bay National Wildlife Refuge Expansion Act. The legislation is expected to be re-introduced in 2025. This proposed legislation would authorize the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) to expand the acquisition boundary of the San Pablo Bay National Wildlife Refuge by incorporating approximately 6,934 acres across six distinct parcels.


A critical provision in the Act prohibits the use of eminent domain or condemnation, ensuring that all land transfers must be voluntary and require consent from existing owners and FWS.


A section-by-section summary of the proposed expansion is available here.

The proposed boundary modification includes:

  • Camp 4: Sonoma Land Trust ownership
  • Camp 5: Sonoma Land Trust ownership
  • Bel Marin Keys Unit V: CA State Coastal Conservancy ownership
  • Hamilton Army Airfield: CA State Coastal Conservancy ownership
  • North Antenna Field: CA State Lands Commission ownership
  • Mare Island Western Early Transfer Parcel: CA State Lands Commission ownership

The targeted parcels are currently owned by three California entities: the State Lands Commission, the State Coastal Conservancy, and the Sonoma Land Trust. All current owners are in support for the proposed legislation. Importantly, the Act establishes a framework for either voluntary federal acquisition or cooperative management agreements, providing flexibility for parcels that the state may need to retain ownership of, particularly submerged lands under State Lands Commission jurisdiction.


Supporting this legislation would advance critical wetland conservation in the San Francisco Bay Area. The expansion of the San Pablo Bay would increase public access to enjoy nature, wildlife observation, photography, hiking, hunting, fishing, and other recreational opportunities while protecting vital habitat for endangered species.


Representative Garamendi points out that the natural beauty included in the San Pablo Bay National Wildlife Refuge "may be something Californians have come to expect, but it remains jaw-dropping to the rest of the world." Representative Garamendi shared his thoughts about the San Pablo Bay and his plans for action in this opinion.


Please consider signing onto our support letter, which urges Representatives Garamendi, Huffman, and Thompson to move forward with introducing this important legislation.

Legislative Framework


Expanding the acquisition boundary is a preliminary step that enables the Fish and Wildlife Service to manage these areas, as FWS can only expand a National Wildlife Refuge within a pre-approved acquisition boundary. A critical provision in the Act prohibits the use of eminent domain or condemnation, ensuring that all land transfers must be voluntary and require consent from existing owners and FWS.



The legislation references the Land and Water Conservation Fund as a potential funding source for acquiring the parcels, with Congress expressing that the Secretary should prioritize using such funding for acquisition purposes from willing sellers.

Conservation Significance


The current San Pablo Bay National Wildlife Refuge encompasses 24,390 acres, primarily consisting of water and wetland habitats spanning Sonoma, Solano, and Napa Counties. The refuge provides essential habitat for migratory waterfowl and shorebirds, while supporting several threatened and endangered species including the California clapper rail, salt marsh harvest mouse, and San Pablo song sparrow.


Historical impacts from hydraulic mining, salt production, water diversions, and agricultural conversion have eliminated approximately 85% of the bay's original tidal marshes. This habitat loss has compromised the ecosystem's ability to manage stormwater and maintain water quality.

Restoration Context


Two of the parcels identified in the proposed Act are currently undergoing or require environmental remediation. The Army Corps of Engineers is leading restoration efforts at Bel Marin Keys Unit 5 and Hamilton Army Airfield in partnership with the California Coastal Commission. These projects include flood protection improvements for nearby communities.



The legislation anticipates a phased approach where parcels would transfer to FWS management only after restoration work is completed. This sequencing leverages the Army Corps' superior funding access and remediation expertise while ultimately placing long-term management under FWS, which has greater capacity for ongoing habitat stewardship.

Broader Conservation Strategy


Beyond this legislation, FWS is simultaneously pursuing administrative expansion of the refuge's acquisition boundary to include additional areas in north San Francisco Bay that demonstrate resilience to sea-level rise. The FWS Director approved a Land Protection Strategy in July 2024, authorizing development of a comprehensive Land Protection Plan with public input.



Both the legislative and administrative approaches support federal and state 30x30 conservation objectives, aiming to protect 30% of lands and waters by 2030.

For more information, contact Tuleyome Policy Director Bryan Pride.

RECENT NEWS

By Geoff Benn • October 7, 2026
Blue oaks on the Berryessa Peak Trail. Photo by Geoff Benn. Our September Nature and You speaker was Tuleyome Education Associate Geoff Benn, who gave a lecture on one of his favorite subjects, California’s amazing oaks. In the lecture, Geoff discussed how California’s oaks evolved and how they deal with a range of challenges, including drought, fire, and diseases. If you missed it, be sure to check out his talk here. 
By Geoff Benn • October 7, 2026
Interns Deana Martinez, Yaquelin Gonzalez, Gabriella Limon, Ben Hubbard, and Keira Lazaro at Woodland Regional Park Preserve. Tuleyome is excited to welcome our largest ever cohort of interns, including four Horticultural Interns and one Communications Intern! Our Horticultural Interns are paired with volunteer mentors at Woodland Regional Park Preserve where they learn about managing invasive plants and monitoring populations of rare native plants. This year’s mentors are Jennifer Hogan and Teri Barry, both longtime volunteers and leadership team members at the Preserve. Our Communications Intern works closely with Program Director Nate Lillge to shape and execute our communications, including social media, e-newsletters, and more. Keep reading to meet each of our interns: Horticultural Intern Yaquelin Gonzalez has lived within the bounds of Sacramento County her whole life, where her mother’s garden and love for rock collecting sparked her appreciation for nature. Her desire to enter the environmental field was further fueled via nature-based field trips during elementary school. After high school, she began studying at American River College and eventually transferred to the University of California, Davis in 2025 to study Environmental Science and Management, focusing on Ecology, Biodiversity, and Conservation. Here, she has gained an interest in soil science as well as plant ecology and hopes to pursue a research career in restoration ecology. In her spare time, she likes to go on nature walks, play the guitar, read, bake, and listen to podcasts. Horticultural Intern Ben Hubbard grew up in Roseville, California where he spent a lot of time outdoors with friends, competing in sports, hiking, as well as instructing elementary school field trips about the environment, specifically wetlands. He just recently transferred from Sierra College to the University of California, Davis and is working towards completing his Bachelor’s degree in Environmental Science and Management with a specialization in Ecology. When he completes his education, he hopes he can make a difference in the world and help to preserve wildlife and natural land for the next generation to enjoy as much as he has. When he’s taking a break from studying you can find him practicing with his recreational sports team, grabbing a coffee, hiking, enjoying a good story, or just hanging out with friends. Horticultural Intern Keira Lazaro is a third year undergraduate at University of California, Davis where she majors in Environmental Toxicology. She’s specializing in pharmacology and biotechnology with hopes to work in a research lab on specific pathogens that attack native California crops. She is also a part of the University Honors Program in Davis and is taking the first couple of steps towards her fourth year signature work on the oxidation chemistry behind electronic cigarette devices, specifically with exposure in indoor environments. Keira grew up in Los Angeles County and hopes to find a career in Southern California once she graduates. When she is able to go back home she spends most of her free time at the beach or hiking. Communications Intern Gabriella Limon grew up in Bishop, California, within the Sierra Nevada and Owens Valley where she became connected with wildlife and stewardship. She spent her later teenage years in Southern California and committed to the University of California, Davis, where she is currently pursuing a Bachelor's Degree in Environmental Policy Analysis and Planning with a focus on conservation management. In addition, she is also a scholar staff member of the UC Davis Women’s Resources and Research Center where she provides STEM-based programming and academic support to students of marginalized identities. Gabby is especially passionate about wildlife justice, land protection, and environmental education. She spends her free time writing, playing video games, tide pooling, hiking, and logging critters. Horticultural Intern Deana Martinez grew up in Arbuckle, California, surrounded by rice fields and almond orchards, which grew her interests in agriculture. She is currently in her 4th year at the University of California, Davis, where she is pursuing a Bachelor’s Degree in Entomology with a Soil Science minor. Along with classes, she is involved in a Nematology research lab, working with plant parasitic nematodes and their interactions with common crop systems in California. She has also held a student position with the Plant Biology research greenhouses as a technician for the past 3 years. Outside of school and work, Deana enjoys hiking, reading, and spending time with her family.
By Shai Demus • October 7, 2026
California’s condors and sea otters are two of conservation’s great comeback stories – species that were once on the brink of extinction and have rebounded thanks in large part to the Endangered Species Act (ESA). That 50-year-old law is now facing one of the most significant rollbacks in its history, and California is fighting back in court. Last week, Attorney General Rob Bonta, joined by a coalition of 21 state attorneys general, filed two lawsuits challenging the Trump administration’s recent changes to the ESA. At the center of the fight is a single but enormously consequential change: the administration rescinded the longstanding definition of “harm” under the Act – a definition that, since the early 1980s, has made it illegal to destroy or damage the places endangered species live, breed, and feed. Without it, habitat destruction itself may no longer count as illegal “harm” to a species, even though most biologists agree habitat loss is the single biggest threat facing endangered species today. The changes don’t stop there. The administration is also making it easier for federal agencies to avoid designating “critical habitat” for at-risk species, and it has eliminated automatic protections for newly-listed threatened species – meaning wildlife officials must now write custom protection rules for each species one at a time. That’s a heavy lift for an agency that has reportedly lost more than a third of its staff, and which currently has 400 species waiting for a protection decision. Why this matters here at home California is home to more threatened and endangered species than any other state. It’s natural to assume the state’s own Endangered Species Act would fill any gap left by federal rollbacks – but legal experts point out that California’s law, as written, doesn’t clearly protect habitat at all. It primarily prohibits killing or injuring individual members of a listed species, not damaging the places they live. That means the very thing under threat federally – habitat protection – may not have a reliable backstop at the state level either. What this means for our work At Tuleyome, so much of what we do, protecting oak woodlands, wildlife corridors, and watershed habitat across our region – depends on the basic principle that a species' home matters as much as the species itself. A condor or a Clear Lake hitch can’t survive court-ordered protection from hunting alone if the habitat it depends on is quietly bulldozed, drilled, or logged out from under it. This lawsuit is about defending that basic principle at the federal level, and it’s a reminder of why local land protection and legislative advocacy matters now more than ever – because the safety net above us may have real holes in it.