Tuleyome's Science Corner: Condors in the Coast Ranges

Amy Boyer • August 18, 2022

California Condor by Brian Sullivan/Macaulay Library

Just a couple of hundred years ago California Condors (Gymnogyps californianus) ranged along the Pacific Coast from British Columbia to Baja California. Molok Luyuk, the name of the ridge in the proposed addition to Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument, means Condor Ridge. They were here once. Could condors fly again over the Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument?


Condors need big ranges of undeveloped land, rocky cliffs or tree cavities for nesting, and big trees for roosting. They are exclusive scavengers that can travel 200 miles a day on wings that span 9.5 feet—nearly twice the wingspan of turkey vultures. They have white underwing patches near the leading edge of the wing, in contrast to the gray trailing-edge patches of vultures, and they hold their wings nearly flat and have a stable soaring pattern, unlike vultures with their shallow-V wings and rocking soaring pattern.


Condors are very social, curious, and playful birds. They mate for the long term and invest two years of care into each chick, from laying the egg to teaching and feeding the fledgling birds. 


This long, slow reproductive period means that it is hard for them to come back from mortal threats, and there are many. Lead shot is the primary cause of death: condors eat particles from pellets left in hunters’ gut piles or animals killed and left by ranchers. But they can also be harmed by microtrash—pieces of glass or plastic or even the tabs from beer cans—that parents feed their chicks, mistaking them for bone chips. Historically, they have also been electrocuted when their enormous wings have contacted two wires while trying to perch on power lines. 


In the late 1900s, there were only 27 condors left, all in Southern California. Every single one was captured by 1987 and a careful breeding program was begun, trying to preserve the remaining genetic diversity. It includes a training program to teach condors not to perch on electric lines. In 1993 there were enough condors to begin releasing them to the wild. 


Now about 200 condors are in captivity in several breeding centers, and 330 condors are in the wild from Central and Southern California to Arizona. Over half live in mountainous areas of California, in the Coast Ranges from San Jose south to the mountains of Angeles National Forest and north and east through the eastern Sierras to near Lake Tahoe. Condor mortality still outpaces their reproduction in the wild, and releases from captivity are necessary to keep their population up.


Just this spring four young condors were released in Yurok traditional territory, in Redwood National and State Parks. More will be released over the years. Bringing the condor back to their territory was the top wildlife priority for the Yurok people, who prepared for 14 years for their reintroduction, beginning with assessing remaining habitat for foraging and flight corridors and roosting and nesting sites, and building collaborative relationships with many organizations. To the Yurok, these scavengers are symbols of renewal, turning death back into life. 


At home, you can see a young condor in the wild on Condor Cam. When in condor habitat, you can protect condors by using and promoting the use of non-lead ammo (required for hunting in California) and picking up microtrash. And someday, with care, collaboration, and a lot of effort, these amazing birds could again soar over Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument.


Check our one of previous Science Corners with more information about California Condors.


-Amy Boyer

RECENT ARTICLES

June 5, 2025
We extend our thanks and gratitude to Stephen McCord as he ends his tenure on the Tuleyome Board of Directors. Stephen has applied his energy and expertise to fulfilling Tuleyome’s mission for many years. In 2016 he managed the first Tuleyome mercury mine remediation project at the Corona/Twin Peaks Mine. He followed that with work on Tuleyome trail projects in the Knoxville Off-Highway Vehicle Area, riding all the trails on his own adventure motorcycle. As a Tuleyome representative, he’s taken many community members on hikes in Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument and the surrounding areas. Stephen has over 20 years of environmental engineering experience, in California and worldwide. He has overseen extensive projects in water quality field work, management and cleanup, and has applied his knowledge to policy development, analysis and technical support. In short, Stephen is a consummate environmental and water engineer, and he brought his expertise to Tuleyome’s many projects. In 2023 Stephen joined the Board of Directors and agreed to serve as President. He applied his supreme organizational skills to managing board duties and activities. He also brought an optimism to the board about what can be accomplished with foresight, good planning and collaboration. Stephen has been a tireless advocate for Tuleyome, keeping the board on task even while handling numerous other professional responsibilities. Fortunately, although he is stepping down from the board, he will continue to support Tuleyome’s mission in many other ways. -Kim Longworth, Lyndsay Dawkins and Bill Grabert Volunteer Tuleyome Board members 
By Geoff Benn June 5, 2025
A river otter making its way up the slide. Looking to take a break with some cute video content? This month we placed game cameras looking into an otter slide at Conaway Ranch. Otter slides are paths worn into riverbanks by repeated use by otters and other animals. The slides at Conaway are quite active, so we’ve been able to get some great footage, including otters, beavers, racoons, snakes, and more! 
By Bryan Pride June 5, 2025
Since April 2024, America's public lands had something they'd never had before: a rule that treated conservation as equal to all other land uses. The Public Lands Rule , introduced by the Biden Administration, formally recognized conservation as a legitimate practice of multiple use, putting conservation on equal footing with recreation, grazing, and resource extraction. Built on decades of management experience and guided by science, data, and Indigenous knowledge, it gives land managers tools to maintain healthy ecosystems while supporting all the diverse ways we depend on public lands. It acknowledges a simple truth: conservation must be valued equally to all other land uses. Now there is growing pressure to rescind it. Why This Matters The environment around us is free-flowing, it's not confined to state borders or county lines. When mining operations contaminate watersheds in Northern California, it impacts the local businesses who depend on healthy rivers downstream, the agricultural communities that rely on clean water, and the families who've been camping along those waterways for generations. The Public Lands Rule recognized this interconnected reality and gave land managers agency to address problems before they spread across California's diverse landscapes, protecting the long-term viability of grazing allotments, recreation areas, and rural livelihoods that all depend on healthy public lands. This interconnected reality is exactly why the Public Lands Rule matters. The Rule is designed to ensure that the places we depend on, whether for weekend camping trips, or cattle grazing, stay healthy enough to support these uses long-term. When an area becomes overgrazed and doesn't recover, access to those grazing allotments is permanently lost, reducing ranchers' ability to maintain their livelihoods and harming local food production. Poor use or overuse of our public lands creates ripples of negative impact that hurt all communities. The Rule's main objective is simple but revolutionary: make sure our public lands stay productive for everyone who depends on them, rather than degrade them. The Rule created practical tools that built in accountability and prioritized future generations' access to healthy public lands. Restoration Leases : 10-year agreements allowing a variety of entities such as, conservation groups, tribes, and nonprofits to restore damaged landscapes—fires restoration, restoring wildlife habitats and cleaning up abandoned mining sites that currently scar some of our most beautiful public lands. Mitigation Leases : A tool that allows land users or other entities to offset impacts from their activities over specified time periods, creating partnerships between different land users and conservation groups to address environmental impacts on public lands. Strengthened Protection for Critical Areas : Clearer guidelines for protecting Areas of Critical Environmental Concern—the most special and fragile places that often provide the best wildlife viewing, the cleanest water sources, the most pristine camping experiences and the richest biodiversity. The False Dichotomy: Multiple Use vs. Conservation The main argument being used to encourage the rollback of the Public Lands Rule is " multiple use ", the legal principle requiring Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands to serve many different purposes. The current Administration claims the Public Lands Rule hinders multiple uses of public lands. Why? The Rule calls for restoring degraded areas and making science based decisions. Contrary to their actual meaning, the current Administration interprets "restoring" and "science based decisions" as "locking up land". Land locking, where access gets completely cut off, is a real concern in some areas—it prevents both recreation and grazing. However, land locking is not what the Public Lands Rule promotes. In reality, it is promoting land healing. Take grazing for example. The Rule empowers BLM to use restoration leases in conjunction with existing grazing permittees to restore degraded rangeland. Monitoring who is grazing where and the number of permits issued for specific areas is a means to ensure sustainable grazing and prevent overuse. Many ranchers and land managers supported the Rule because they understand that healthy land is productive land. Overgrazing and environmental damage hurt their livelihoods too. The same principle applies to fire recovery. When public lands are damaged by sweeping wildfires, there is a need for active restoration: replanting native vegetation, stabilizing soils, removing hazardous debris. Restoration has to take place before safe recreation, grazing and other uses can resume. At times, restoration requires temporarily limiting access to burned areas as they recover. The goal is to allow for our lands to recover and heal before we start depending on them again with our multiple uses. Land restoration is not just limited to grazing or extraction; it is essential for recovering from wildfires. Whether it's grazing, recreation, or extraction, the Public Lands Rule isn't about stopping these uses, it's about understanding that healthy ecosystems are prerequisites for multiple use, not obstacles to it. You can't have sustainable grazing on degraded rangeland, quality recreation in fire damaged landscapes, or responsible extraction without considering long-term impacts We Are Public Stewards The Public Lands Rule represents a historic shift in how we value conservation, its potential rollback is a setback. But the vision it represents, conservation as a form of legitimate multiple use, remains essential and is not gone. As stewards of these 245 million acres, we have the power to practice conservation in our own actions and advocacy. Every time we practice Leave No Trace, support local businesses that operate responsibly on public lands, and make our voices heard in land management decisions, we're building the foundation for balanced stewardship that benefits everyone. Our public lands belong to all of us, which means we each have the power, and responsibility, to be good stewards of the lands we love. -Bryan Pride ( bpride@tuleyome.org ) Certified California Naturalist Policy Director